Danderman123

3 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Trump's three pre-covid deficits were 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 trillion dollars. Not great to be sure. BUT... Biden's two post-covid deficits have been 1..4 and 1.7 trillion respectively. So, respectfully, you are talking out your cloaca. 

 

Inflation and interest rates are killing average Americans' futures. 

It's interesting that you left out the data for FY 2020 and 2021, but mentioned the two years under Biden when Covid was still a thing.

Or, do you mean that COVID ended the minute that Trump left office?

Anyway:

The federal deficit in 2020 was $3.1 trillion, equal to 14.9 percent of gross domestic product.

In fiscal year 2021, which ended on September 30, the federal budget deficit totaled nearly $2.8 trillion

So, your post contained a lie by omission, which is how you chose to defend Trump.

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Clutching and straws comes to mind. Biden must be desperate to resort to begging.

Does he have nothing to offer other than "vote for me because Trump is a bad man".

 

Actually, that's a pretty effective position.

Trump said he would testify.

Stefanik calls for wiping Hamas ‘off the face of the Earth’ and touts Trump policies in speech to Israeli Knesset

The Trump position on the Gaza war is hard-line.

56 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

Interesting difference in the eyes over 7 days.

 

What do we think is going on here?

 

Drugs or something else?

 

 

Oh, God, you're right.

For sure, Biden will be drugged for the debate, so Trump won't have a chance.

He should pull out now.

21 hours ago, save the frogs said:

This is complete nonsense

If you are going to criticize a peer reviewed study, unless you can criticize their methodology, you have nothing to say.

38 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

My favourite contradiction of this war and there are many is - "Ukraine needs to join NATO so that article 5 applies and Russia will not dare attack it then ... but if Russia wins in Ukraine they won't stop and will attack NATO next".

Actually, if Russia wins in Ukraine, Kazakhstan is probably next.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Correct. Cohen was convicted of tax evasion and was looking at a possible sixty years. He plead guilty to the additional campaign finance violations for a reduced sentence and to help get Trump. 

 

We've been over this countless times. 

How did he plead guilty to a campaign finance violation if there was no campaign finance violation?

The MAGA theory is that the campaign finance violation that Michael Cohen pled guilty to was not a campaign finance violation?

1 hour ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Nah. It's just his oratory style.

 

You're lying because you don't like him and have a case of TDS. (Just go through this thread and look at all the crazy things you've said because this involves Trump.)

Does his oratory style include mixing up the names of famous leaders?

4 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

That has no bearing on determining that Irrespective condition.

If the jury is not smart enough to see that Team Trump urgently wanted to pay Stormy Daniels because of the imminent election, Trump will be acquitted.

15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I understand this is a waste of time, but the payment benefits Trump, with or without the election. 

 

So, why the urgency to pay Stormy Daniels after the release of the Access Hollywood tape?

17 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Yes so you can't say the only reason Stormy came forward was because of the election because she already did.

 

And the Judge is reviewing the FEC "Irrespective" notion this weekend and the extent that Brad Smith can address it or prosecution rebuttal can address it.

I am saying that Trump's motivation for paying her was the imminent election.

8 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

I said she first showed up in 2011 when Trump was not running for office.

Trump didn't bother to buy her story in 2011, he waited until the election was imminent.

Thanks for the assist.

9 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

No point in posting sense on the IMO man made climate change scam. Like science, opinions are fixed, are they not?

Because if you think that the world's scientists are engaged in a giant scam, there's a padded room waiting for you.

Most scientists work for universities or other organizations who don't derive their funding from Climate Change.

And then there are the grad students who don't get paid at all.

Michael E. Mann, the scientist who predicted the current spike in global temperature, works for Penn State University. His hockey stick chart was derided by oil company funded trolls until global temperature spiked. Now the trolls admit the planet is getting warmer.

So, the claim by trolls that scientists lie for money is a lie.

13 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

She first showed up in 2011 but despite the timing, as Mr. Smith said in 2018, he was a billionaire real estate developer TV reality star so there would be lots of reasons for Ms. Stormy to try to sell her story of screwing him when his new wife was pregnant. And Keith Davidson had lots of marks that were not politicians.

My point was that the payment to Ms. Daniels was related to the election, as shown by the urgency expressed by Trump's mooks after the release of the Access Hollywood tape.

Your post was unresponsive and basically just noise. Did you join the Trump Defense team?

7 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Actually, it is possible that Biden will be so incoherent that people will think that he has taken LSD...  🤔

I guess you are not aware of the downside of reducing expectations before the debate.

We saw this before Biden's SOTU address, which ultimately resulted in the "Biden is on drugs" talking point.