stevenl

Up to her to get paid. But it should be disclosed, as should the origin of the money.

9 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Sounds like a Harris Salad. Typical from The Hill. There is no agreement about another debate from either side. 

 

My comment stands.

Lol, you said it was a misrepresentation, when he clearly stated the words. 

Sure, stand by your comment, already proven nonsense.

1 hour ago, jimmybcool said:

Well you made the claim how bout a few sources for someone who wasn't paying attention.  😅

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/19/media/kamala-harris-press-strategy-local-media/index.html

2 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Look at your own link - just a misrepresentation of one opinion - no facts.

Seems pretty clear not to be a misrepresentation.

"Baier, who is regularly in contact with both campaigns, said he is “getting the sense from him [Trump] and the campaign that they aren’t moving past it, and really the holdup is not the Harris campaign and Fox. It is the former president.”"

3 hours ago, jimmybcool said:

 

Today is the first time I heard any media call her out for non-answers other than Fox news. 

You not paying attention is not an argument either way.

This thread is about latest developments. Please continue your discussion in a different place.

1 hour ago, jimmybcool said:

 

If I were advising her I would suggest not debating again.  And to continue evading any serious interviews with media.  Heck it is working.  Sadly the American electorate is so shallow they won't force her feet to the fire to be more available and actually answer questions with a real response.  But yeah, if she wants to win the media is shielding her and she should stay her course.

 

The media are calling her out for a lack of interviews. Nobody is shielding her, she's campaigning hard in a non traditional way.

And it's working.

Was Robinson present at the campaign event?

10 hours ago, frank83628 said:

skipping war is skipping war, both the same

One was legal, the other one not. Student exception was legal, faking a disability not.

Do agree it's a long time ago, i don't care about this either way.

14 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

i haven't read the whole thread, but based on comment above are you claiming to be fighting in Ukraine?

Read this thread.

1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Yes, bad for Russia's bloodlust. It is also bad for the Russians who were incinerated.

 

 

Oh do keep up with the Russian propaganda efforts. You are on  "yesterday's news."

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said that Vladmir Putin’ is not really supporting Vice President Harris in the upcoming presidential election: He said Putin was joking.    Putin prefers Trump.

 

 

I wouldn't trust anything coming from that corner. If I look at what's happening with efforts to undermine the elections it's clear Putin wants Trump to win. Which is only logical looking at Trump's words on Ukraine.

1 hour ago, thesetat2013 said:

Very sad day if she wins simply because of the hate of another person... Shows the mentality of using evil to become a leader works. Makes me wonder what other evils she will accomplish if voted in the office. 

Almost correct.
It shows people are rejecting the evil that is called Trump.

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Perhaps you can enlighten us as to your medical credentials to be making a medical diagnosis.

See the OP.

15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

The "Democrats", the party who "select" the nominee and then hide her in the basement in the hope that the electorate don't figure out how inept she is before the vote. 

 

Sounds pretty Democratic to me. 

Sounds like you don't realise she's out in the open campaigning on a daily basis. Just not in the traditional way, which is irritating the media and confusing the opposition who don't know how to react.

8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Of course, if it were suspicion that Trump had a hearing aid you'd likely accept it as fact, even without proof.

If there are reasonable suspicions either candidate had a hearing aid i would look into it and form my opinion.

This is not 'reasonable suspicions'.

4 hours ago, stevenl said:

Looking forward to a reliable source for that percentage of 50. IDF nor Hamas are reliable sources.

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   You didn't actually ask me to do anything .

??

4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Your post was a deflection to my question.

 

B/S it was asking you to back up your claim. Pointless asking a question if you cant back up your own claim first.

And you keep deflecting. Nick made a claim, i asked him to back it up.

So yes, you were and are deflecting. I'll get back to you when my request has been answered.

10 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Deflection to your claim that I am waiting for you to back up.....

 

 IDF nor Hamas are reliable sources.

 

 

 

Your post was a deflection to my question.

So now you want to get an answer to your deflection while the question remains unanswered.