stevenl

1 hour ago, Robert Paulson said:

So let me get this straight, and forgive me for discussing the previous drowning… the guy was saving his kid and wife or something, the rescuers got to the wife and child. Ok good job. And I assume in the hectic nature of it all the man then disappeared and they could not find him? I’m sorry but seems to me that it would be quite literally easy as pie to save someone unless they got completely distracted by the wife and child and the man perished in the meantime. Which I suppose is what must have happened. 

In 2 meter waves it's difficult to spot a head bobbing out of the water.

18 hours ago, tgw said:

 

some people here a very obviously a piece of Putin's propaganda machine.

The sad thing is that some of them don't even realize this 

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

So you don't know and also make false claims

Lol, stop trolling. I didn't make any posts, you're the one not understanding a basic and clear post in English. I think he even provided a link, you could try that one if you're seriously interested in this.

10 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

I know, now again, what genocidal policies were these? What part of that do you not understand?

Ask the poster, I only helped you understand a post in very clear English.

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yawn................

 

"In recent decades, the genocidal policies of Britain in Ireland have gained domestic recognition"

The genocidal policies have gained attention in recent decades, by no means does that indicate the genocidal policies were from recent decades.

58 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Can you link to these genocidal British  polices in Ireland in the last decades? 

So you really don't understand the post, written in plain English.

26 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

What genocidal polices in Ireland in the last few decades......lol

You really think "In recent decades, the genocidal policies of Britain in Ireland have gained domestic recognition" means 'the genocidal policies were from the last few decades'?

6 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

You mean - like illegally entering the Capital building - to be charged and jailed for an (unnarmed) insurrection?

I gotta agree and so do all rational people - the clear bias in the USA justice system is evidenced - Trump will tear them all down when POTUS.

And that is what scares them most - last time he naively tried to appease and change them - next year he will just destroy them.

 

"the clear bias in the USA justice system is evidenced".

Agree, in an unbiased system Trump would have been locked up many times already.

7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

I think from what I understand is that many were issued citations and not taken in. All of the participants should have been printed and booked and that would yield a lot of evidence. Confiscate the Palestinian costumes as evidence and then you have DNA. Now you will with 100% certainty be able to discern who was where. 

They know who was there. But the issue is not being able to prove who committed crimes like vandalism.

15 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

If you had read both articles then you would know its not as simple as that. Who told you there was no evidence linking 31 individuals? Why did the DA also use his "professional discretion".

 

Are you sure you've read all the posts in this topic? its tedious having to write the same thing again and again when its here already.

It is as simple as that.

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

No I am not, read the OP and read this article then you tell me

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13553841/Manhattan-DA-Alvin-Bragg-drops-charges-against-dozens-anti-Israel-protesters-Columbia-University.html

That's what the op said, that's what your link said and that's what I said. There's no evidence linking the 31 individuals to crimes.

40 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Why did they get arrested if they did not commit at the least a misdemeanor? Were they trespassing? Did they had arrested and charged? 

46 were arrested, 31 no charges. So you're saying there is evidence that those 31 committed vandalism or another crime? Sounds to me there's evidence of 15 people's crimes, so they have been identified committing the crimes, but not of the other 31. They know their identities but can't prove they committed crimes.

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Good news that. 

Bad news for the haters, democrats won't care much.

43 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  How can it be racism when Europeans are the same race as British people ? 

Answered already, sorry to see you don't understand.

31 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea, the OP plus dozens more on youtube 🤣

No recognizable individuals damaging property.

1 hour ago, jvs said:

Yes and you can believe whatever they send will work and is up to specs!

What is putin  getting from North Korea?,junk.

 

I think the low speed drones he's getting are doing surprisingly well for the moment. 

I don't trust the claims from the commerce secretary, nor do I trust the claims from Kaspersky.

"During the police raid, cameras inside Hamilton Hall were covered, making it difficult to prove any damage or specific misconduct by individuals."

So no proof, therefore no case.

12 minutes ago, JayClay said:

 

A rejection of the global agenda, campaigned for, and won by, those running the globalist agenda....

 

I agree that people thought the UK was being run poorly. But the EU weren't the ones running the UK.

The leave campaign managed to shift the blame to the EU.

Russia threatening to arm north Korea? North Korea is supplying Russia with weapons to resupply their losses which they can't replace themselves.

An empty threat.

1 hour ago, Bangkok Barry said:

 

That is exactly my point. There is a far greater chance of being robbed by a Thai than a foreigners, yet she warns especially about foreigners.

She works in a bar aimed at foreigners. So for her the risk of being robbed comes mainly from foreigners.

30 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   How can it be racism when British people and Europeans are the same race ? 

He said Brexit was based on racism, I would presume immigration.

Verdict is in 

https://apnews.com/article/hinduja-switzerland-geneva-human-trafficking-exploitation-india-b0a40f9872ea096c4722754c1267490b?user_email=b7f6ffaa26bd566b13fa9916085a50f0f6dac8bce4f1c2e06919061d0bf3e17a&utm_medium=Afternoon_Wire&utm_source=Sailthru_AP&utm_campaign=AfternoonWire_June21_2024&utm_term=Afternoon Wire

2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Europeans are the same race as British people , so it cannot be racism involved 

That's not what was said. Poster said that barriers were set up as a result of Brexit, and Brexit was the result of racism. Personally I don't agree with that premises, I think Brexit was the result of a misplaced superiority feeling from people who can't accept Britain isn't a major world power anymore.

2 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Boeing won't face charges for violating a 737 Max plea deal, report says.

 

https://www.airwaysmag.com/new-post/boeing-avoid-criminal-prosecution
 

US official says no decision yet on whether to prosecute Boeing.

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-expected-evade-criminal-charges-155826121.html

From the Yahoo link

"Earlier on Friday, the New York Times, citing anonymous sources, reported that the Justice Department "is expected to allow Boeing to escape criminal prosecution" for violating the DPA.

Leon's email said, "The reporting was simply not correct."

The Times later revised its story to say that the Justice Department is "considering allowing" Boeing to avoid criminal prosecution."