stevenl

Which was exactly the point of his remarks.

She is well known worldwide. Seems a lack on your side.

I liked the hush money reference.

Excellent, funny vid there.

Sad state of affairs that he resorted to this. Some of the posts are telling as well.

He would. Illness and accidents are covered.

The same goes for an alibi defense. Coming up with an alibi after this time would be unbelievable.

It creates barriers. Why create barriers that will prevent people from executing their constitutional rights to solve an non existing problem.

I think it is because of division. Carlson saws division within the US which the Russians love.

A civil lawsuit arising out of a possible rape .

He has an impossible task on his hands as well: shut up on social media about the case or face further problems. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/26/politics/trump-e-jean-carroll-trial-warning-social-media/index.html

Not related to the comment you replies to.

It wasn't her that made the comments.

Strange post, showing an incredible bias and no bearing on reality. The party dealt with the anti semitism from one of its members. Your opening sentence should have been 'No surprises. Yet more anti-semitism dealt with by the Labour party.'. You then continue to say Abbott should be removed from the party, she made ridiculous comments. Abbott was the one who dealt with this. In your opinion she should be removed, after she's the one that dealt with this.

It works both ways, difference is the factual claims by the left are easily supported by links.

You haven't visited the place, neither has Mr knowitall. This death island myth is just that, a myth.

Wiggle wiggle.

In both cases terrible, but if it's drawn it will physically come off easy.

Did you read your link? Still Africa. "Instead, the international team argue, the distinctive features that make us human emerged mosaic-like across different populations spanning the entire African continent."

That's what happens when factual claims are made without proof. Make a claim, show the proof.

So Biden has eroded trust in democracy. Incredible reasoning.

Seems very unlikely there is insurance.

Amazing feat as in 'outstanding' or as in 'i don't believe it'?

Win or lose he will add it to his claim it's political. Doesn't make it true.

He is using the exact same argument I read on here many times from pro gun posters. There's no point in a ban if you can go next state to buy what you want. Imo all steps in the right direction are welcome, but a federal bank would be better. No chance of that happening now though.