stevenl

So arresting and booking is 'talk and no action '.

I think we should be worried about a con man who with a blatant disregard for the law has been getting away with this for a long time. Glad justice is catching up, but I'm afraid he'll be dead before any punishment will take place. Just hope the humiliation beforehand is bigly tremendous.

Biden is lying far less than Trump. But that's not the point, the point is it's hypocritical to call Biden out for lies while defending the biggest, by far, lyer. And as suggested by others already, change your news sources.

"Is Title owned by Russians does anybody know?" Not afaik. But quite a few Russians staying there.

Right, Biden lies too much. Good we have our honest former president ready.

Imo he is in contempt already by violating the gag order. I think next week the judge will rule on the motion from prosecution to this effect.

No we are not.

A failed politician, tossed by her own party, without any self reflection at all. Why anyone would listen to her I don't know.

I would be very surprised if a clear answer is forthcoming.

He doesn't have to be objective, he is executing US foreign policy.

This 'october 7 happened in a vacuum ' again And no, that's not an excuse for what happened on October 7, there is no excuse.

I quoted yours, so no twisting at all.

Yes, logical thinking is a challenge for you.

Why is that?

No, you misunderstood his first post and keep on banging on with that misinterpretation.

Hezbollah most likely, not Iran. And no, that's not the same.

See your quote in my post. "Do you think they had permission, I can't think of any other way a foreign country would fly over another country without permission, unless at war with that country of course." They flew over Syria so must have had Syrian permission according to your reasoning. Now all know that's not correct, so your post was incorrect.

So you're saying Israel obtained permission from Syria to attack the Iranian embassy compound in Syria.

So? Recent terrorist attack. And no, there are no confusing messages here.

More recent anders breivik.

None, see earlier posts about the difference in law. My post was about the bombing, not the distinction.

Same answer to a post that can be made to all your posts here and everyone else's.

That's what I thought, you don't care. International law does care, but the law won't have any consequences for Israel. But other consequences are very visible now.

Was it part of the embassy compound or not. According to many media outlets it was, you seem to be avoiding the issue.

I think the consulate was part of the embassy compound. If correct that makes the difference irrelevant.