stevenl

" They dynamics are well known, and expected." You're like a windvane here. When I commented on this a few weeks ago you were denying, and now suddenly it was to be expected? Only a fool did not see this coming.

That's why I said "Since the SC appears to be willing to hear the case".

Since the SC appears to be willing to hear the case this argument has been tossed out "The Trump campaign earlier accused Mr Smith of trying "a Hail Mary by racing to the Supreme Court and attempting to bypass the appellate process"."

You do realize it would be his own lawyers asking the questions, or doing the badgering as you call it?

So since the guardian published I, the opinion of the quoted Tories is to be ignored.

Amir Weitmann, the head of the libertarian caucus in Israel's ruling Likud Party, From https://www.kyivpost.com/videos/23228

"It’s hard to imagine this was ever actually a priority,” I think that's the crux of the issue. This is theatre, it may look good and distracts from the real issues.

'A Likud partymember' is not doing his position or influence justice.

Looking forward to a link of that peer review.

His company has been found guilty already in this trial.

I don't know who you mean with 'we', but I appreciate science. Scientific opinions and articles I value on a topic like this, non scientific opinions not so much.

So the answer is no, sarcasm is a foreign comment to you. If you want to ask Danderman a question, send him a PM. Questions on the open forum are for everyone to see and respond to.

Ever heard of sarcasm?

Thanks for a post without personal attacks on other forum members or taking swipes at other people.

I really don't understand this. Why the consistent need for personal attacks because someone has an opinion different from yours.

I like the idea of a monarchy, think it has more standing and believe letting politics handle the present roles will not be an improvement. Let them be, but an assessment of the financials is warranted. And yes, I agree it is totally undemocratic.

No you were not, you were denying facts. The number and extend of lies by Trump surpasses all.

You 're asking posters here for proof of something he and his business have been found guilty of already.

Strange post. There was plenty of evidence against Trump, the Republicans refused to impeach. There is no evidence against Biden, and you accuse Democrats? Where were you when Trump was impeached?

Looking at their frontrunning presidential candidate I doubt that's the reason.

I like Israel, which is why I visited several times. Which is more than the vast majority of posters here I do disagree with some of their policies including the present military operation.

Thanks for reminding me why I stopped visiting this subforum. You just omitted 'anti-semitic' in your post.

I could think of a few arguments not to banish cars, but 'Pattaya is too big' would not be a reasonable argument.

Israel is focused on winning the battle while Hamas is winning the war. I have said it a few weeks ago to be laughed at, but only people unwilling to see can deny that public opinion and even politics is slowly turning away from Israel.

Your post is off topic but it did give me a good laugh. But it's also sad, your post indicates how much society has moved to the right.