I'm showing your 'facts' are not correct. Like this.
"A few days later, the IT company that was heavily involved in the Russian Collusion hoax suffers what's being called history's largest outage".
No, that doesn't mean that the hacking of the DNC came via Crowdstrike.
No, the Muller report didn't debunk Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
So no facts from your side, just baseless conspiracies.
After all this bickering on topic.
The street with the rainbow crossing was closed, just around the corner is another one. And that other one is still there.
You said "the bullet hit the back of his right ear". Which is clear speculation. It is entirely possible there was no direct hit.If you claim not to be speculating you need help.
An indirect hit seems more likely to me. But we'd better wait for the report, a speculative correction of a speculative correction of a speculation is bound to be wrong somewhere.
Just wait for the report and draw conclusions after that.
Yes, far fetched. And mentioning the Deep State make it clear where you're coming from.
In danger of what? The president wasn't there. Again this shows where you're coming from. Nothing wrong with that, but stop with pretending to be an outside observer.
First reports. Some don't jump to conclusions when facts are not there yet.
Later from CNN: shooting was an assassination attempt. I didn't check the others.