Liverpool Lou

No, it is not, Wise Australia Pty Ltd. is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) authorised as an Authorised Deposit-taking Institution (ADI) limited to a provider of purchased payment facilities (“PPF licence”).

Crack-down He he...missed that.

You don't know that for sure, and I don't know that for sure. There were multiple offences that are notoriously difficult to prove/disprove in a court of law. The case thus boils down to word against word, so it all comes down to who we believe.. It did not boil down to "word against word", it boiled down to medical evidence that proved that she was no abused and a police investigation that produced no evidence and resulted in no charges were made against him. You can choose to, irrationally, not believe that evidence if you want, but why would you?

What was the "pun"?

What's wrong with "working illegibly"?

But he didn't. Medical and police evidence debunked his ex-wife's vindictive and malicious claim.

If you want a little girl.

Those "useless annoying small coins rattling around in your pockets" are anything but useless if you use them next time you're in 7-11 to avoid ending up with useless annoying small coins rattling around in your pockets!

"Can someone please educate the writer of this article in basic math?" No one's maths needs to be checked, but someone needs to educate you about basic English comprehension, all the report said about Thailand was, "...in the last two years, there has been a change", that is 100% accurate.

I think that was very rude and fails to consider where you are. Just because you think 20b is an insignificant amount, doesn't mean the person paying the bill does. Hear, hear! Well said.

Ridiculous, indeed...ridiculously rude of you.

But they do!...UOB, Kasikorn, Bangkok Bank, Krungsri, for example.

Nothing to do with grammar policing, at all, just sarcastically humourously pointing out a completely unintelligible comment... "maybe you’ll get lucky and find the Chinese food <deleted> is going to school and change my and wants to invest in the house seems like the reason why did to me TT".... ...if you can make sense of that, you're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!

Seems to be 14%, not 18% and then only if you select the extremes of the graph rather than a period of time, eg. it's only 4.5% up from October '23 to date.

Are you meaning there are other laws that fit that catogory? Or are you refering something else Mr Liverpool Lou. Interpret it as you see fit, Mr itsari.

But Lou nobody was talking about Indians in Thailand, you specifically mentioned Indian business owners in Pattaya. And I was asking how you KNOW that they are Thai citizens. That's the reason that I specifically mentioned Pattaya, which I believe is still in Thailand. I did not say that I know that the "Indians" to whom you refer are Thais, I said, factually, that many "Indians" have Thai nationality and that could apply to those operating businesses in Pattaya.

Have you considered speaking to your Chinese neighbours about promoting it to/through their community?

Huh? Isn't this an English language only forum?

So "appropriately" that it's generated exactly zero interest!

Yes. Listing prices and real value are never the same!

Not being snarky Lou but how can you be sure of that, have you been round and interviewed them all.? It seems that you are being snarky...have you interviewed them? I posted "many Indians", not "them all" [sic]. No one needs to interview all the "Indians" in business in Pattaya (and the rest of Thailand) to know that a lot of Indians in Thailand are, in fact, naturalised Thais.

My money would be on neither! Nor Colliers Thailand or the Employment Department.

Part-owned, but, so what?

It's not on its own, there.

Never heard that one before, aren't you confusing it with " being too big for one's britches"?