Gottfrid

Yeah, must be great to imply one thing in one post, and cover eventualities in another. Good job. Would be better to stand for what you post instead.

What, so a woman should not be able to walk in whatever public place she wants, without the need to accept that in some places it´s ok to break the law? Is that a sound opinion? Does it matter how severe it was, when it was unwanted? Are you saying like that because the need to protect the male race? Now we all know what a good and respectable wife you have. Wonder where you met her. However, the agreement to pay 200k is very good. Maybe it will scare others that think such behavoir is ok.

What about compensation and arguing like children about it? If a person gets bullied, then he should resort to talking to the school and his parents. Not go and almost kill a person.

When you get the munchies, you just got to feed it.

These days?

I hope his followers see that he has to spare on food, because he bought a printer worth 2,5 month of food.

Exactly! Of course, he will have time left according to the law and constitution. The court just have to apply same decision at all levels. However, it looks like far too many members here are either to bitter or just don´t want to understand.

Why do I have issues, just because I do not fit your streamlined opinion. Sure, the comment has positive responses, as it fits the attractive and always hot populist section, where we can tell that police and authorities in Thailand are doing wrong and making the wrong decisions. This forum is built on negative aspects about Thailand. My opinion is to let them deal with things how they are fit to do it, and the way and order they do it in. If we can accept that, them we are ok as guests in Thailand. If we can´t, why bother to stay and only have negative remarks om everything?

Hmmm, was it wrong or did you agree? ????

As far as I can read, they are not denied travel to Thailand. Neither is your wife. It´s just a matter of if you will put your money where your mouth is and pay up so they can see and experience what you just explained. But, in reality, I think it´s you that want´s to come back.

No, that does not make it your business. You have the choice to not look, not engage and not get involved.

What is not decent wearing one or more tattoos? Some people like it, and some do not. That has nothing to do with decency!

Was not about who started. You said it was a waste of time to deal with my comments. That was the reason for the question. Maybe you like to waste time, what do I know. I know many members are very old here, so if that is the case, I can forgive you for forgetting what you wrote. Also, I judge your comments as coming from a person that thinks he know how to run it better. If you are living here, you are the guest. Then, accept how they are dealing with their country and how different departments work.

Just drop it. It´s still working. As soon as a person tells you something, it´s always old or not right. Sorry, you give the wrong advice, and that´s a fact. It is already outlined

Why make it all so hard. There is no process to outline, as they will give different answers. You already know that. By explaining he need the account for being able to transfer money for getting a different visa will help in some cases. I would easily get 3-5 bank branches to say yes to open a bank account only by explaining that. Second, he just take his wife with him. She can sign in the background for him as a guarantor for the account. That will not be put as a name as account holder. The account holder will be only his name. No need to ask questions about it or discuss the possibilities. I have done that way to. There is no problem whatsoever. Absolutely no need to pay for an agent. Recommending that, begs the question if a person recommending such ways have an agent in pocket and get commission.

Great! He can do it for free himself. Must be much better to give Siam Legal 10k for that.

Begs the question why you bother with the comments then? When did it become a waste of time for the police to catch wrongdoers and criminals? Maybe, you are the one deciding what is right and wrong for the Thai police to do as a premium guest in this country?

This is on topic as it has to do about you wording of a state of emotion and health. Something that we are discussion, regarding the behaviour of the culprit in this piece of news. As you clearly could read in my post, I did not call Wikipedia a trustworthy source of information. Please go back and read: "lose as all can contribute". I only used that as an example on the closest this you could come to the untrustworthy source "urbandictionary" that you gave. The real definition for the persons condition in this news thread range from mental instability to mental illness.

So, when you realized, you were in the wrong, then you turned to my English instead. Looks like even foreigners have a face problem. ???? Never talked about thefts. That was you mentioning in your post as well, by telling what the police have to do before they attend to a case they already had resolved.

Look below what the article above your read. Then you will now. See, they already had him, when you posted that they will track him down. The big question, is not what I am on. ????

Yes, urbandictionary, is a very trustworthy source, as you clearly can read on the description. ???? The other one you post above, does only have an explanation of another combination of the words you used. As do all other sources online. Try using other sources like at least Wikipedia (However, very lose as all can contribute). There, the closest you will find is Fragile X Syndrome. After that, try Britannica, Cambridge Lexicon and such sources.

Nope! It´s called mental instability. Your description does not exist.

If you look above your comment, I think you where about some hours late. However, it´s advice time. Read the article!

Looking at your handle, and comparing that to your comments is as looking at a bill missing the smart code.

Yep, or use it wisely and shoot a half-stray.