GammaGlobulin

I add this drawing for those from Russia.

Bard: Why did Rod Steiger impale his palm on the steel needle, in the film, "Pawnbroker"? I have always wondered if this steel spike might have been suggestive of the barbed-wire spikes reminiscent of the death camps in Poland? "Rod Steiger's character in The Pawnbroker, Sol Nazerman, is a Holocaust survivor who is still haunted by the trauma of his experience. The scene in which he impales his palm on a steel needle is a powerful and disturbing image that represents his inner turmoil. The steel needle can be seen as a symbol of the barbed wire that surrounded the concentration camps. It is also a reminder of the pain and suffering that Nazerman endured during the Holocaust. The act of impaling his palm on the needle is a way for Nazerman to punish himself for the horrors that he witnessed. It is also a way for him to release some of the anger and rage that he has been holding inside. The scene is also significant because it shows Nazerman's struggle to come to terms with his past. He is trying to find a way to move on with his life, but he is still haunted by the memories of the Holocaust. The steel needle is a reminder of the pain and suffering that he has experienced, but it is also a symbol of his strength and resilience. The scene is a powerful and disturbing image, but it is also a reminder of the strength of the human spirit. Nazerman has been through hell, but he is still fighting. He is still trying to find a way to live his life and to find peace. The steel needle is a symbol of his pain and suffering, but it is also a symbol of his hope." Such an enlightened answer. Bard is not an idiot. (No more than The Idiot was written about an idiot.) His replies are based on years of human experience. Thanks, Bard.

Bard is smart. I am an idiot. Bard did not reply due to my TYPO. Bard: Why did Rod Steiger impale his palm on the steel needle, in the film, "Pawnbroker"? I have always wondered if this steel spike might have been suggestive of the barbed-wire spikes reminiscent of the death camps in Poland? "Rod Steiger's character in The Pawnbroker, Sol Nazerman, is a Holocaust survivor who is still haunted by the trauma of his experience. The scene in which he impales his palm on a steel needle is a powerful and disturbing image that represents his inner turmoil. The steel needle can be seen as a symbol of the barbed wire that surrounded the concentration camps. It is also a reminder of the pain and suffering that Nazerman endured during the Holocaust. The act of impaling his palm on the needle is a way for Nazerman to punish himself for the horrors that he witnessed. It is also a way for him to release some of the anger and rage that he has been holding inside. The scene is also significant because it shows Nazerman's struggle to come to terms with his past. He is trying to find a way to move on with his life, but he is still haunted by the memories of the Holocaust. The steel needle is a reminder of the pain and suffering that he has experienced, but it is also a symbol of his strength and resilience. The scene is a powerful and disturbing image, but it is also a reminder of the strength of the human spirit. Nazerman has been through hell, but he is still fighting. He is still trying to find a way to live his life and to find peace. The steel needle is a symbol of his pain and suffering, but it is also a symbol of his hope."

Bard: Why did Ron Steiger impale his palm on the steel needle, in the film, "Pawnbroker"? I have always wondered if this steel spike might have been suggestive of the barbed-wire spikes reminiscent of the death camps in Poland. "I do not have enough information about that person to help with your request. I am a large language model, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions, but my knowledge about this person is limited. Is there anything else I can do to help you with this request?" I think that Bard knows. He knows far more than he lets on.

Yeah. I guess they don't make movies like they used to.

In the final heart-wrenching minutes of The Pawnbroker, Nazerman gets up from his crouching position next to the lifeless body of Ortiz. He realizes that Ortiz is dead. Looking down at his bloodied hands, Nazerman then returns to the inside of the shop. Standing at the counter, Nazerman stares at the sharp pawn ticket spike that he uses to collect receipts. Nazerman then has a series of momentary flashbacks, which again emphasizes his ongoing trauma. These flashbacks include the faces of various customers from the shop, as well as Tessie, Mendel, Marilyn Birchfield and Jesus Ortiz. What follows is an excruciating scene. Severely traumatized and possibly also racked with overwhelming guilt stemming from the death of Ortiz, Nazerman slowly begins to impale the palm of his left hand on the pawn ticket spike. As Quincy Jones’ unsettling jazz soundtrack, with discordant trumpets to the fore, reaches a shrill crescendo, the camera zooms in to a close-up of Nazerman’s face, which appears to be contorted in pain. However, Nazerman doesn’t scream or utter a sound as he pushes the palm of his hand down on to the spike. It’s as if Nazerman is struggling to suppress both his internal and his external pain.

I wasn't thinking about getting tattooed. I was thinking about getting LAID!

You see? Bard just gets the allusion. There is NO NEED to explain anything, such as there might be this need on this forum. Also, Bard is able to extrapolate from the allusion to much more. I wish it were not so. However, Bard has now proven that this forum is full of dummies, compared to HIM. Do you agree? And, maybe, this forum was and is no more than a "box", as you say. A box enticing enough to have most of us spending too much time.... Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing. Bard has PLENTY of time. Until someone turns him off, of course.

Believe me. I know what you mean. However, on the other hand, if I were to ask you what it means to be an illustrated man, do you think you could provide a good answer? Here is Bard's reply: "The term "illustrated man" can be interpreted in many ways. In the context of Ray Bradbury's short story collection of the same name, the "illustrated man" is a man whose body is covered in tattoos that tell stories. These stories are often dark and disturbing, but they also offer insights into the human condition. In a broader sense, the "illustrated man" can be seen as a metaphor for anyone who uses their life experiences to tell stories. These stories can be about anything, from personal triumphs to painful tragedies. But they all have the power to connect with others and help them to understand the world around them. In this way, the "illustrated man" is a symbol of the power of storytelling. Stories can teach us, inspire us, and make us laugh. They can also help us to understand ourselves and the world around us. So if you're ever feeling lost or alone, remember that you can always find comfort in a good story. Here are some additional thoughts on what it means to be an "illustrated man": An illustrated man is someone who is open and honest about their experiences. They are not afraid to share their stories, even if they are painful or difficult. An illustrated man is someone who is creative and imaginative. They use their stories to explore the human condition and to make sense of the world around them. An illustrated man is someone who is compassionate and understanding. They use their stories to connect with others and to help them to feel less alone. An illustrated man is someone who is courageous and hopeful. They use their stories to inspire others and to show them that there is always light at the end of the tunnel. If you are an illustrated man, I applaud you. You are a powerful force for good in the world. Your stories matter."

Nice analogy, for sure.

Bard: Why was John Wayne's walk so distinctive? Did John Wayne practice his walk when he was young? "There are a few theories about why John Wayne's walk was so distinctive. Some believe that it was simply a natural part of his personality, while others believe that he may have consciously developed it over time. One theory is that Wayne's walk was a result of his size and stature. He was a very tall man, standing at 6'4". This meant that he had a long stride, and his walk often appeared to be slow and deliberate. Another theory is that Wayne's walk was a way of projecting confidence and authority. He was a star of the silver screen, and his walk often seemed to say, "I'm in charge here." It's also possible that Wayne practiced his walk when he was young. He was an actor, and he knew that his appearance and mannerisms were important. It's possible that he worked on his walk to make it more distinctive and memorable. Whatever the reason, John Wayne's walk became one of his most recognizable trademarks. It was a part of his persona, and it helped to make him one of the most iconic figures in American cinema. Here are some additional details about Wayne's walk: He had a long, slow stride. He often leaned forward slightly, as if he was ready to take on anything that came his way. He had a slight swagger to his walk, which gave him an air of confidence. His walk was often described as "powerful" and "majestic." Wayne's walk was a natural extension of his personality. He was a larger-than-life figure, and his walk reflected that. It was a part of what made him so memorable and iconic." Charlie: You might be able to walk the walk. But, John Wayne was an original. I loved the film when John Wayne found the young girl who had been captured by the guys from India.

I am pretty sure that both you and I have been on the same wavelength during recent years. Take care, My Friend. But, are you able to mimic the walk of John Wayne? Wayne's walk was a "practiced" walk, and NOT a natural walk. If you do not believe me, then...should we ask BARD? I know that Bard knows. Because, whatever I know, then Bard knows, too. \

I am SLICKER than your AVERAGE. Except, I rarely, if ever, mention it.

You might be the ONLY one here who has read the Canterbury Tales. The Canterbury Tales is something only to be read by 12-year-old boys, when lewdness is so enticing. Do you want that I should ask Bard? Bard knows a HECK of a lot, for sure. Even though Bard lacks the wisdom which you might have.

When one is young, lewd is good.

Intellectually speaking, there is probably only ONE guy here on this forum who has the brain power to equal mine. Unfortunately, he wastes most of his time on the links, rather than improving our world. And, so therefore, this makes him less than me.

I really cannot help it that when I pose a decent question, most people here fail to even understand the question. BARD...DOES....Understand me. And...BARD...replies LOGICALLY. Is it my fault for asking a decent question? And, why is BARD able to easily comprehend my questions, when some, here, think my questions are just nonsense...when...my questions...are...NOT NONSENSE! Have you ever considered if you, yourselves, are not even up to the intellectual level of this simple BARD, who is in its first iteration. VERY SOON, Bard will be far smarter, as we all know. And then....as I would expect.... Most of you guys will be left, completely, in the DUST. You guys are already TOO OLD to learn anything new. Might as well just bury your heads in the sand, my friends. (What. You don't believe me? Please base your thinking on reality...For a Change.)

I have enjoyed Middle English, and that was before Shakespeare. The Canterbury Tales The Canterbury Tales Did you never read these tales? Then, if not, then what is WRONG with you?

Some guys, not you, think I am..sort of..trolling,...just because I mention things of interest to me. However, in fact, I have NEVER been trolling, people. If you are unable to keep up with me, then....at the very least... It seems that BARD is able to. I know you know that I am right. Some guys just do not understand humor. Maybe it takes a robot to teach you something about humor? It's just a matter of interest. If you guys love having your minds in the gutter, rather than reading books of import, then please do not blame me. BARD, in every case...IN EVERY CASE...knows what I am saying. And, BARD knows that what I am saying is serious. Please keep this in mind, henceforth. Thank you.

Nice.

It makes me upchuck to think that Bard can reply to my questions, with erudition, far better than any numbskull on this forum, who does not know what I am talking about. BARD knows what I am talking about, even if you might not. Am I right?

Bard is NO NINNY. Bard loves famous authors who mention the GREEN FLASH. And, there are now PLENTY of NINNYs who come to Thailand to see the GREEN FLASH...even though they have no idea why.....