GammaGlobulin

I vividly recall, when I was three, chasing squirrels around our giant oak tree. Now that I am over 70, I recognize the glory of the pursuit. Round, and round, and round. The squirrels never tired.

I don't know about you, but one of the MAIN reasons why I prefer being over 70 involves my angst. In fact, every new year I reach, after 70, decreases my angst by a few percentiles. It's like Musk. Musk has said that, no matter what, we should resort to DIPLOMACY rather than military confrontation, with China, at all costs. What does this even mean, at my age? Do you even think that I care? Musk seems bent upon saving Humanity, even though he also acknowledges that he is an alien. Joking aside, however, the older I get, and the more I become acquainted with Mankind, the less worry I am about seeing the end of Organized Human Civilization. I guess you will know that it is Noam Chompsky, or Nim Chimpsky, who is PERENNIALLY worrying about...."The End of Organized Human Civilization". He never talks about the END of Civility, though. ========= So, my NUMBER ONE reason why I am glad I am over 70 is that I no longer need to worry about the end of Humanity. I have lived so long that I know Humanity, fairly well. Humanity might have been worth saving, many years ago. But, Humanity is a different Animal, now. I am just saying that, to know Humanity, is one of the main reasons I am blessed to be over 70. Once one knows Humanity, then the death of Humanity becomes less fear invoking, if you get my meaning. ========== Another reason I like to be over 70 is because I did not like being put in nappies when I was young. And, since I am not yet 90, I still have another 20 years to look forward to before I might be put in nappies, again. ======== To be serious, I would say that the reason I most prefer to be over 70 is that I can more easily fool others into thinking that I am daft. Or, if I am daft, it would be hard to know. In fact, nobody knows, yet, if I might be daft, or not. ======== But, I must tell you..... I have been watching Chomsky, almost on a weekly basis, at times. And, Noam is still sharp as a tack. I have sent links to some of my friends. And, my friends are amazed by Noam. ============= So, I would guess that another thing I like about being over age 70 is to know, first hand, more than those of age 13. ============= What was it like to grow up in my day? We had REFRIGERATORS in the Kitchen which exhausted out the bottom of the machine, unlike today. We had squirrels that would congregate around Oak Trees for Acorns. =========== Basically, 60 years ago, things were the same. And this is why being 70 is so good. Because, 60 years from now, things will not be almost the same. This is why being 70, now, is still OK. ============= Concerning squirrels, even at my age of 70, I still marvel...

Maybe you are right.... Maybe they BOTH should RIP... I am getting tired of the same old videos... Combined Age must be about 250, by now....

You mean...he was not STICKMAN?

She often reminded me of Kunte Kinte. Still, she was very hot for her time.

I wonder if she might have had Restless Legs Syndrome.

You forgot his other wedding song, Dead Flowers. I am, actually, surprised that I cared so much for Tina, in my golden years. I thought she was a joke when I was young. But, these days, after I turned 50, I began to dig her legs, and her sound.

Me, too.

Does this explain the frenzy of eye movement among actors in Hollywood... Pre-1950? Watch any closeup, just before the Big Kiss, for example.

Maybe it was nothing more than the ladies being complete suckers for Mick's humongous lips.

Maybe she just really loved the Voiceless Velar Plosive, without stop.

Mick or Ike?

Watching Mick and Tina on stage, there seemed to be a spark between these two. But, was it true? Tina once said she liked Ike, but this was a relationship that she might have regretted. Still, every time I see someone wearing an "I Like Ike" pin, I am reminded of Turner. You, too? I now wonder how Mick remembers Tina. Anybody know?

One day soon, a machine will surpass the brilliance of Roth. And, one day, soon, our human- cultural history will come to an end. When machines can duplicate, in perfect detail, all that has ever been written, then History will become a thing of the past. They talk of using watermarks and metadata to help us discriminate between what is real and what has been fabricated by machines. Such fools are they to imagine that watermarks might be a solution. Meanwhile, Sam, over at OpenAI, has a SEVERE case of Vocal Fry. I hope Sam can be cured.

Speaking of Roth, I guess you know he also wrote about liver.

If you wish to complain, then try Portnoy's Complaint. Anything written by Roth is not half bad. Life is not fair. Roth deserved the Nobel. Someday soon, if not now, Bard might get a Nobel, for his silicon implants.

I hope that you know that I would never fabricate a chatbot's output. Bard is just for fun. Bard is full of nonsense.

Or, Maybe it just wasn't his... FLAVA.

Don't you just HATE guys with "poor taste"? I do.

Speaking of Poor Taste, my first thought was that glorious musical, "Springtime for Hitler". If you recall, too. Such poor taste!

I thought you were a chemist.

I already asked Bard. His reply is copied above. Please review what Bard said about GammaGlobulin. It's there in black and white for anyone to read. Or, please ask him yourself.

Nay, I say! The Cloister is far from being the first novel written in Modern English. Far before that, I was out in the barn, sleeping with Tom Jones, and the pigs.

Vitamin C. Pauling, no doubt.