- Popular Post
Longwood50
-
Posts
1,634 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by Longwood50
-
-
Just now, Jingthing said:
Thats not details of his sex life. That's similar to sharing marital status.
You must be from the Bill Clinton school of "that depends on what the meaning of is, is.
Give me one reason why the teacher should openly share the fact that they are "gay"
If the subject was brought up by the student, the teacher should refrain from engaging a student in matters that are personal in nature and outside the realm of his/her role as a teacher.-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Jingthing said:
You're unbelievable!
Criminal molestation.behavior is already illegal everywhere.
There seems to be limits for you in your crusade to trash LGBT people.
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:You're unbelievable!
Criminal molestation.behavior is already illegal everywhere.
There seems to be limits for you in your crusade to trash LGBT people.
Yes but you said teachers were not talking about their sex lives. It is no more correct to be talking about or sharing heterosexual experiences with children than gay.
Keep your personal life to yourself and out of the classroom. -
10 minutes ago, Jingthing said:
Your flaming and its DISGUSTING.
Teachers aren't sharing details of their sex lives.
Oh really, what rock do you live under.
https://www.familyeducation.com/school/sexuality/coming-out-class-when-teachers-tell-students-im-gay
-
3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:
Your flaming and its DISGUSTING.
Teachers aren't sharing details of their sex lives.
It matters not whether it is heterosexual or gay. The teacher who deliberately introduces their "partner" to a student is actively promoting conversation with a student about the teachers personal life. That is wrong. They know that will lead to questions that are innapropriate discussion between the student and the teacher.
NOW TELL ME JUST ONE REASON WHY YOU BELIEVE A TEACHER MUST BE ALLOWED TO INTRODUCE THEIR PERSONAL LIFE INCLUDING A SAME SEX PARTNER TO THEIR STUDENTS.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:
You're just wrong and you're actively promoting bigotry.
I would say the same thing if it was a teacher promoting their personal religious, political or heterosexual behavior. Teachers are there to teach academic subjects. Not to discuss their personal lives.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Just now, Jingthing said:The grooming thing again.
100 lying hate speech.
Oh really,
If it was a heterosexual sharing details of a sexual nature with minors it would be "grooming" We call those people pedofiles.
Calling a gay person who does the same with minors is NO DIFFERENT. It is grooming.
There is absolutely no valid reason why any teacher whether heterosexual or gay should be sharing their personal sex lives with students. PERIOD-
1
-
1
-
2
-
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:
There you go again.
Obviously someone cares because these anti LGBT activists are pushing and passing anti LGBT bills all over the country.
You have it backwards. No one cares but it is the LGTB community that is pushing for freedom to exploit. If the LGTB community did not infringe on the rights of others to foster their agenda NO ONE WOULD CARE.
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:
Are you American?
Does that make a difference? You have repeatedly gone on this forum essentially groveling to people to not just accept that there are gays in this world but have them join your crusade to proselytize the gay lifestyle.
Are you that insecure that you need public affirmation? I certainly never had any teacher, nor did I ever know of any teacher that felt compelled to share the intimate details of their personal lives particularly their sex lives with students.
Why you think that anyone cares who you choose to sleep with is beyound me. If you are comfortable with your choice then who cares what others think.
Certainly the majority of people who are heterosexual have rights to. And one of those rights includes the right not to have our children indoctrinated in a public school where they are captive. If you wish to go on a crusade to foster the gay lifestyle that is fine but calling a duck a chicken doesn't make it a chicken and calling teachers in classrooms "freedom of speech" rather than what it is "grooming" is no more accurate.-
1
-
1
-
-
On 4/10/2022 at 5:11 PM, Jingthing said:
Since forever. Gay is not limited to sexual. It also includes emotional. I recall such attraction as among my earliest school memories.
Though I was never into fashion!
And I suspect no one cared then, and I have no clue why you think anyone cares now whether that is your attraction or anyone elses "gay" attraction.
This undying pleading for not tolerance but rather advocation of the gay life is wrong. Live your life as you see fit with others that share your lifestyle. Stop trying to evangilize it and stop trying to demand that the general public who is decidedly hetrosexual bow to it.-
1
-
-
On 4/10/2022 at 2:11 PM, Jingthing said:
Teachers aren't robots.
I recall numerous teachers announcing their upcoming or recent marriages to the class and of course they gendered their partners.
Also kids do ask questions.
It appears the anti LGBT bigots want LGBT teachers to lie.
No they want them to teach academics not indoctrinate them on their sexual experiences, partners, or proclivities. Certainly if I asked my teacher whether in grade school, high school, or college something in regards to their personal relationship, the appropriate response would be that sharing personal details with students is inappropriate.
If a teacher feels compelled to "celibrate" their sexual diversity they should do so with other "age appropriate" persons and certainly not with the children under their supervision.-
1
-
-
If someone needs to know why such a law is necessary, this story was posted on the internet today. Now why the H is the teacher preaching such nonsense to children He should be fired for both inappropriate subject matter as well as spreading absolute lies.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/04/11/watch-teacher-tells-kindergartners-when-babies-born-doctors-guess-whether-the-baby-a-boy-or-girl/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR05gBBebV9tOBO1vUL8Mr_72MF60cEfKI292w9lg1yVA7xuyBYFpZNUvRA
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, ozimoron said:Nowhere does he say he's teaching sexuality. In fact he denies that he is.
Did you even read the articles where the cartoon script where it talks about if you have boy parts but feel like a girl and at the school where it talks about having your private body parts touched and it feels good. If you believe this is appropriate you should not be within miles of a school either.
And no, I can't think of a single occassion where a teacher throughout my grade school, high school, colllege or post graduate work felt compelled to share "family pictures" with me.-
3
-
1
-
4 minutes ago, ozimoron said:
Show some evidence that this is happening. Social studies has been on the curriculum forever.
As I said you are confusing tolerance with grooming. If you have a teacher complaining that he can't share his gay experiences with kindergartners and you think that is "social studies" I suggest you need remedial education
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/watch-florida-teacher-upset-he-cant-share-gay-experiences-with-kindergartners
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, ozimoron said:Teaching social tolerance is very much within the remit of a school's responsibility and always has been regarded as such
You are confusing the term "tolerance" with "grooming"
I might say you have to have tolerance for someones religion. That does not mean I wish to have them evangelizing to my child. I may say you should have tolerance for someones race but that does not mean I want teacher indoctrinating my children that caucasian people are evil. I may want someone to be tolerant of of other people's political opinions. That does not mean I want them schooling my child on their political views.
Teachers are suppose to teach academic subjects not inject their "values" on social issues.-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Jingthing said:Its fear mongering is all to whip up the right wing base.
It is obvious that somehow those that choose alternative lifestyles feel this compelling need to tell and instruct everyone about their sex lives. Your posts continually on this subject is evidence of your need. It is not fear mongering. It is not wanting a public institution to be "forcing" what should be family values on their children in a captive setting. No different than teaching religion, politics, or critical race theory.
I serously doubt you care to continually hear from heterosexuals who wish to share with you the joy of heterosexuality. The vast majority of people dont care about anothers sex life and they and I have no idea why you think they should care about the sexual orientation of others.
There appears to be this compelling need to evangelize the LGTB lifestyle. It is not enough to have society not care or accept but rather the LGTB community has this insecurity that is demanding both approval and fealty to the LGTB life. It is as if there is this doubt about their choices and to erase those doubts they want the public to validate their choice.
It is not the place whether it is the workplace, or schools to "indoctrinate" values and lifestyle. What you and others choose is your business and it should remain your business. Trying to "impose" is no more righteous irrspective of whether it is religion, politics, or sexual orientation.-
1
-
1
-
1
-
On 4/5/2022 at 11:52 AM, Jingthing said:
All grades.
What state standards?
Parents any grade may file lawsuits.
So teachers will be forced to erase the existence of LGBT people
What the hell is any teacher in any grade giving lessons on their sex life. Public schools are their to prepare students teaching them to read, write, do mathmatics, history, science, civics etc.
Public schools are not to be a place where students should be required to become proficient in the Kama Sutra.
Teachers have every opportunity outside of the classroom to profess their beliefs on sex to other like minded individuals. They should not be allowed to indoctrinate what is a captive group in the schools. No different than it should not be allowed to teach religion, critical race theory, creationism, or anything that is not an a subject intended to foster a childs academics.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Can she take a few thousand of the stray soi dogs up the mountain with her.
-
When you go to pay it will ask you for method of payment. Shopee Pay, credit card, or COD. You have to change the method to COD. If the shop does not offer COD you won't get that as an option. COD is OK but frankly I don't think it provides much protection.
If the product does not show up, you get a refund from Shopee. If you pay COD and the product shows up when you open the package and find it is the wrong item, or damaged you still have to apply for a refund from shopee and that process is a bit longer since you paid COD. There only option is to put the refund in your shopee pay account. -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Lopchan said:The comments in this thread, almost promoting the cruelty to animals
I love animals particularly dogs and have always had at least one dog and as many as 3 at one time. However, anyone who thinks it is not cruel to cage and animal all day or let them fend for themselves on the streets of Thailand is certainly inflicting a different kind of cruelty.
The stray animals should be rounded up and either adopted out or euthanized. That is for the both the betterment of the animal and for the safety of the public.
I can't count the number of close misses I have had as dogs take over the streets. My GF hit one on her bike and has had numerous encounters where they chase her on the bike as she motors by. I see where the dogs become a nuisance in eating establishments begging for food from the customers and in one instance a pack of dogs viciously attacked another.
Do the world and the animals a favor. They are your companion and treat them accordingly not caged all day. If you can't properly excercise and socialize with your animals, then don't have them.-
5
-
1
-
1 hour ago, RocketDog said:
I make a monthly contribution to a local organization that captures and neuters stray Soi Dogs/cats as well as vaccinating and helping with adoption
You need to up your contribution. From all appearances their genitals are working faster than the vet who is neutering them.
-
1 hour ago, howlee101 said:
Not disagreeing with your point but, the authorities (read RTP) don't even adequately enforce traffic laws. IMO, it would be a useless ordinance
No but if they incentified the police officers to enforce the law they would. But your point is well taken. A law that is not enforced is just a meaningless law.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I am not in favor of anyone poisioning dogs. However, many around the globe and in particular in Thailand are irresponsible about their pets. They let them roam and have no problem with the nuisance the animals are to their neighbors.
The dogs in our village howl at night which is disturbing, but they also urinate and defecate in the grassy areas in the village. That is hardly something that neighbors should have to put up with.
Thailand needs a pet nuisance ordinance, where people who routinely let their animals roam are automatically fined for not properly caring for their pet. It is also improper behavior to subject the pet to becoming attacked by other animals or struck by motor vehicles.
A quick trip down any Thai street shows you that stray dogs are a problem and whether family pets or ferral animals they are a nuisance and present a hazzard to drivers.-
33
-
4
-
11 hours ago, impulse said:
You'd have people lining up to take those 80% "junk" panels off your hands, and they'll still be better than a brand new panel was 10 years ago when they weren't nearly as efficient and cost twice as much
So what you are saying, is that it has not worked in the past but trust me that "this time will be different"
Please explain to me then why we have so much plastic, glass, metal, paper, in the Thai landfills and people are not flocking their to mine that treasure. For that matter they don't even have to go to the landfill just grab all the trash you believe is so valuable along the sides of every street.
Picture of just one landfill in Thailand will what you will agree must be a "fortune" in unrecovered resources. Please note all the people there to recycle it.
-
10 hours ago, ChC1 said:
Hydrogen fuel and bio fuel is the future. Sensible government who really care about environment issues should seek alternative and should not tie their resource in E.V alone
You are absolutely correct. Right now you have governments around the world either enticing people with EV subsidies or forcing them through ICE bans. The marketplace will eventually determine what are the most effective alternatives.
I believe one day the world will wake up and realize that with a significant number of people driving EV's that the electric infrastructure won't support it and that there are unintended enviornmental consequences from the mining, manufacturing, and disposal of lithium batteries.
You are also correct in that batteries slowly lose their power and that car that got 300 km to a charge now only gets a fraction of that as the car ages. They also seem to forget batteries don't generate electricity, they store electricity. That electric is generated by something and for now that is coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear. A very insignificant amount comes from solar, wind, and hydroelectric. Solar panels when spent contain dangerous chemicals, acres of wind farms are hardly aesthically pleasing still require transmission lines, and use tremendous amounts of energy to construct. In the USA the various agencies typically obstruct any hydroelectric generation because of its impact on the fish and other aquatic animals.
-
1
-
Inflation troubles
in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
Posted
I got two memo's one it was Trump's fault the other it was Putin's fault.