
NoDisplayName
Advanced Member-
Posts
3,738 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by NoDisplayName
-
Another Wise problem
NoDisplayName replied to Furioso's topic in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
If you're PULLing from a bank using ACH, that may take 3-4 days due to the additional confirmation processing. Plaid (paid third party service) cuts that down to 1 day. Wise charges you a 0.25% fee for this service. I did the numbers in the post above. The fee works out to $2.50/$10K. That's only about 85 baht for every $10K, so may be worth it to some for the convenience. PUSHing from your bank via ACH is free, and should be accomplished in at most a day. -
One of his closest advisors, in a musky voice, cooed "Mr. President, we cannot allow a permafrost gap!"
-
Jeepers! What's Trump gonna do when he learns the Chinese are planning a manned mission to the moon in 2030, the Russians in 2031? The axis of evil will steal all of our cheese!
-
That would be a compromise, as the official name of Mexico is ............Estados Unidos Mexicanos. How much will it officially cost, and will Trump send the bill to Greenland?
-
It doesn't make sense for the US to own Guam. It's already at risk of tipping over. The Chinese will make better use of it to extend the RBI instead of stationing warplanes to bomb brown people.
-
He has loads of combat experience! He fought hard for those five deferments!
-
Jimmy Carter died Dec 29. Trump Wants U.S. Control of the Panama Canal. Here Are 3 Things to Know. Dec. 26, 2024 https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/26/us/politics/trump-panama-canal.html Shazam v2.0!!! Trump must be a prophet. But, c'mon, man. Using the death of an American President to lash out at Trump? Is nothing sacred to you people?
-
British tourists’ speedboat crashes into Thai mangrove forest - video Some people are having all the bad luck! This is the same British tourist group that survived a tree falling on their bus. I distinctly remember the chest in the photo.
- 54 replies
-
- 12
-
-
-
Thanks........found it. So a bit of a conversation ensues and whether the lights came on and she finally grasped it, or she now wanted rid of me I have no way of knowing. She then put the total figure in box 1 into box 2 and a 0 in boxes 17, 19 & 20. Box 2 is exempted income for Section 2, line 6, which is the total of 5 types of exempted income (actually should be considered allowances or deductions), all exclusively related to Thai salary: 1. Provident fund contribution 2. Government pension fund contribution 3. Private teacher aid fund contribution 4. Income exemption (disabled or over 65) 5. Severance pay under labor law That confirms she was just pulling it out'a her behind to get rid of you! She subtracted your pension, but did not revise the other lines, still showing you had a tax due of 26,500 with matching taxes withheld. But I see this was just a worksheet, not an actual paper return. The numbers from blocks 1 and 2 would be transferred to the PN91. Yet line 2 does not apply to foreign pensions. No other office or officer will do this for you on a return, as you have to provide evidence for he exemptions. Try this trick online and you'll have to provide proof, or explain in a personal interview. Or pay the tax.
-
Not to beat a dead horse, but I now see this is in English. Should be easy enough to follow if'n I enlarge the photo. TRD lady has incorrectly included all your NON assessable pension in income, but there is NO way on the form, or in the regulations, to exempt it. Line 12 is your tax due = 26,500. She made up a number that she stuck on Line 13 = 26,500. 480 * 43.90 * 12 = 252,864 --> 26,500 Line 13 is "withheld tax", yet no taxes were withheld. Line 14 is total tax = 0 and see note (Attached evidence for 8, 10 and 13. total ___ copy/copies) That doesn't seem right, and probably wouldn't pass confirmation checks using online filing. Your return would be kicked out for processing at the head office, and you'd receive a letter requesting proof of taxes withheld. Without providing that, you'd be billed 26,500 baht. You, and only you, could use this particular method at this, and only this, office, filing with this, and only this, official.
-
Further, the bill (1) prohibits states from registering an individual to vote in a federal election unless, at the time the individual applies to register to vote, the individual provides documentary proof of U.S. citizenship; and (2) requires states to establish an alternative process under which an applicant may submit other evidence to demonstrate U.S. citizenship. Those evil republicans, adding a mandate in the legislation for the states to design their own alternative methods to prove citizenship! What exactly are you afraid of? That ineligible voters might be removed from the voter rolls? Don't worry, the dead are still citizens.
-
Problem is they wait until you're on your cellphone or looking for your wallet, and scratch up the car while you're not watching them. I could probably make a fortune selling automatic fly swatters with motion/distance sensors that mount on the car grill...........maybe the mosquito zapper kind with higher voltage!
-
Again, too many pages to sift through to find the info, but....... Did you not attend two TRD offices, getting conflicting information? One who correctly said you don't need to file, as you have insufficient assessable income to require filing, and then a lady who lied to you about declaring a tax-exempt UK pension? The bad lady who lied must have read the examiner article.
-
That's because the US is composed of 57 individual, sovereign states, and that elections for national offices are run by each state setting their own rules. If there is NO voter fraud, the democrats can make their points by adding a clause in the legislation mandating regular publication of voter fraud statistics. Then each month they'll have updated talking points to regurgitate on all the talk shows.
-
SAVE ACT This bill requires individuals to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship in order to register to vote in federal elections. Specifically, the bill prohibits states from accepting and processing an application to register to vote in a federal election unless the applicant presents documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8281 If this is just a rehash of already current law, then what's the problem? Why would you oppose legislation that makes no significant changes? If there are no illegals voting, then nothing will come of it, and the republicans are just wasting their time with a useless public relations exercise. Wouldn't you prefer them expending their resources on trivial nothingburgers, than writing legislation that will affect the country? Do you want them to start working to rename the "Gulf of Mexico" instead?
-
Murder and bank robbery and shoplifting are also illegal. Who needs enforcement when you have a law?
-
Journalistic license, reported in the examiner. https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-news-foreigners/2025/01/03/revenue-department-boss-calls-on-tax-residents-in-thailand-to-file-2024-runs-by-the-march-31st-deadline/ Certainly, this year, all expats who have been residents of Thailand for 180 days or more in the course of the last year are liable to file a return. The return pertains to taxable income earned within Thailand and remitted to Thailand during 2024. So the infotainment writer is apparently unaware of non-taxable income streams and how DTA's work. The writer is not an expert, just a dude. Changes to tax regulations in 2023 make all income remitted to Thailand by foreign residents in the country for over 180 days last year declarable.
-
Too many pages now to try and find where that quote came from. If from a newspaper or tax advisor, this is a mistranslation/misunderstanding or they simply shortened the actual change in interpretation of the law for brevity. My understanding is there were NO changes to the existing law, only in the interpretation. From the instructions for the form: In computing tax liability by using the net income method, a taxpayer has to bring into account all assessable income arising in a tax year. "bring into account" = declare