MicroB

https://www.expressnews.com/news/politics/article/the-crypto-industry-saw-trump-as-a-champion-some-20340246.php https://news.sky.com/story/investors-descend-on-trumps-golf-club-for-148m-meme-coin-dinner-amid-protests-13373098 The US President's crypto dinner was last night, a reward for giving him lots of money, hosted at his golf club in Virginia so he could pump more money into his business. The White House said that the President was in a private event (Trump v US; official acts are immune & unofficial private acts ARE NOT IMMUNE). Selling the position for personal profit “It’s kind of a fund-raiser” for Trump, said a Korean crypto executive who flew in from Seoul for it, “& he’ll always be good to his sponsors.” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/22/us/politics/tru... and they were played

Kneecap?

Ah, the cherubic Tate. Did the young Tate ever think he's grow up to be a slap head nonce.

I thought it was Ivanka who was the nomimated heir? I expect there will a repeat of all of his sport hunting posing-with-animal-corpses trophy photos appearing. Hunting for food is one thing, but I suspect there is a photo of him gurning alongside a heap of dead chimps someplace. He's not exactly a Teddy Roosevelt.

But its never going to fly again, at least with passengers. The USAF still has some final due diligence to go through before final acceptance. Now budget has already been allocated to the two AF1s under construction, so new budget has to be allocated; does the DoD have a slash fund for such projects, or does there need to be congressional approval or something. Before all that, they need to decide how much money is needed. They need to survey this aircraft, which is an unknown unit to the Air Force. Its been on the market since 2020, and essentially unused for most of that time, and seems to have sat for some time on the Isle of Man. While it will undoubtedly come with a pile of paperwork proving condition, I suspect USAF engineers will employ very high standards, to see if the aircraft does have any inherant faults. That's going to take some time, and they'll probably need to hire outside contractors just to do that. So that job will be put out to tender, after a committee has sat around a table to draw up the tender. Say in 3 months, they have an idea what exactly they have. Along the way, someone has to decide what do they want; and this will get contentious. At the one end of the spectrum is a fully specced out plane the same as what is being built right now. But besides cost, two of the reasons the new AF1s are delayed is lack of security cleared engineers and shortages in the supply chain; nothing is off the shelf. If they pull engineers off the current AF1 projects, then these new builds will be further delayed. Adding a 3rd aircraft will put further strain on the supply chain, unless they mothball the other projects and focus just on this. The other end of the spectrum is do nothing; te plane was good enough for the Emir of Qatar, its good enough for a US President. The 2020 For Sale ad gives some idea of the configuration of the aircraft https://web.archive.org/web/20200905142708/https://www.amacaerospace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/200707_AMAC_Aerospace_Mini_Tech_Spec.pdf Clearly, its built for luxury travel, with lavish sleeping facilties, galleys, bathrooms. In comparison, actual AF1 seems much more functional https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq855lx87z3o AF1 is supposed to be an airborne command post; capable of in flight refueling , and carrying enough stores to sustain the passengers for a sustained period. On the contrary, Qatari 1 probably wasn't intended to fly more than 14-15 hours at a time, and fridges aboard to carry enough camel heads for the feasts, generally eaten while grovelling on a floor, albeit a nicely carpeted floor. AF1 is supposed to carry 7 days worth of food for 102 people; about 300-350kgs of food I assume the sustainability requirements are not up for discussion. Adding refueling to the aircraft I suppose is a big job, but not without precedence given used airliners being converted to tankers. AF1 has hardened electronics, meaning the miles and miles of wiring, and hardware have an additional coating to protect against the effects of EMP, such as following a nuclear blast. Does Qatari 1 need this? That's the risk assessment. The hazard is the President's plane becoming a dead stick following an attack. Is it likely over the next 4 years? There will be a range of opinions. This is where there will be people in the room trying to minimize the risk score artificially. I've been in the rooms where these sorts of discussions occur about new military kit, and frequently "ALARPS" is used, which is weasel code for cutting corners. AF1 is also armour plated; on the engines, and the fuselage. For this to be fitted, I assume the aircraft really does need to be stripped back. Could they forgo that, or is there an alternative ballistic solution that is "good enough" (the president has a 40% survivability compared to, say, 70%). Importantly, AF1 has a fully equipped medical suite, with the ability to support surgery in flight (meaning the aircraft also has accomodation for a surgeon, in addition the the President's own physician). Qatari1 does have certification for a medical suite, if the Emir's bedroom is cleared out (certification obtained during COVID), but that's little more than a hospital bed, and room for some monitors and an oxygen bottle. Again, the next discussion is whether they need the full fat mini-hospital or just a bed, for a morbidly obesse octogenarian. Vance, take note, this might be your shot. Comms; its a flying communication centre, allowing members of the government to communicate reliably and securely, and enabling a president to take that most terrible of decisions. I've see talk of passengers of Qatari1 having to use burner phones. Again, a decision might have be taken whether you need something that is good enough, basically fitted into a strapped down Pelican case. But then you are at risk endangering the United States if an enemy calculates that a First Strike wouldn't be met a return attack based on an estimation that comms to or from AF1 could be disrupted. What else could they use Qatari1 for? I suspect a popular choice would be to convert it to ConAir-1; a mega flying prison for all the deportees, MS-13 members, Al-Qaeda, ISIS and any other malcontents. While the actual JPATS aircraft are just regular (clapped out) 737s, a President might like the idea of a plane with actual cages, for all those Hannibal Lectars, because it looks tough. You could probably fit it out for 400 "regular" passengers, 100 more in Hannibal cages and 100 tooled up guards. Current prison transport Cages, or some of that double decker seating to sequeeze in 1000 of them Or the cheap option, rip out the fittings, sling in troop seating. 2029, the President can get the plane back, the original fittings are in the skip at the back.

Well done on funding IVD tests. Overuse of the PSA test is a big issue in medicine. It has lead to many thousands of men undergoing unnecessary surgery, that leaves them in a debilitated state. Hence in the UK, there is no recommendation to provide PSA testing to men without symptoms. I've spoken to doctors in the VA about this, and they are in 100% agreement, but the men read about these tests, and demand these tests. The PSA test misses many cancers and indicates cancer where there is none. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2817322?guestAccessKey=4f006acb-c40d-46ea-83d9-38c1f5b3815d&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=040624 Prostate cancer deaths in the US are about 50 per 100,000, with a fairly aggressive screening programme. The UK, which does not practice PSA testimg for screening purposes, but otherwise has a demographically similar male population, is 40 per 100,000, which is slightly in the top half of European countries If you have been through 20 years with cancer like symptoms, but no cancer, I sympathise. Cancer sucks. No one should blame the victim for the wicked disease. Only blame God. As usual with these diagnoses, there is diagnostic hindsight, often not due to the patient, but due to the physician, and whether they are paying attention. A couple of real world examples. My mother had breast cancer 40 years ago. It was quickly identified and successfully treated, thanks to the NHS. However, as a result, she was left immunocompromised, since lymph nodes needed to be removed. Roll on 30 years. She has a back ache, and like most people, just cracked on with it, until after 2 weeks, she went to the doctor for advice. I don't think its that unusual for people to put up with a sore back for a couple of weeks. Doc instantly decided it was orthopedic, and prescribed morphine. 48 hours later, mum was a paraplegic. What happened was quite rare, possibly treatable, but accelerated by strange circumstance. Paraplegia was caused by what some call a spinal cord stroke or infarction; the blood supply was interuppted by a build up of pus. Looking at the scans, I could see about 3 vertebrae were dead; when bone is infected, the blood supply whithers, and the bone dies, and a scan shows a change in density. What the doc failed to do, because of confirmation bias, was something very simple, take the patient's temperature. Back ache and a raised temperature should be instant pointers of concern. The doctor could have done a quick PCT test which would have confirmed suspicions, but there was probably no point compared to ordering an ambulance, and a trip to A&E, scan and likely emergency spinal decompression. I suspect that would have saved more function. Why the whole paraplegia thing happened so fast. Normally, these cases can be resolved through antibiotics. But my mother was immunocompromised and the fever was a sign her body was fighting. Its not well known, but morphine depresses the immune system. Essentially, it was the coup de grace. More recently and closer to home. I had a few urinary problems; nothing major, but blood spots in my urine were. Off to the GP. No tests were done, just a listen. Upon hearing my wife was Thai, the doctor's instant conclusion was an STD, and said I needed to got there. It wasn't. Then she decided I must have cancer, and I was booked in for an emergency scan the next day. Only I was flying to India shortly after, so I declined, whereupon the Consultant called me a problem patient. F 'Em, I thought. At no point did anyone do a basic measure. 6 months later, in for a boil to be lanced. The nurse ordered bloods. I mentioned the blood in the urine, how it appeared as spots. She said, that's not blood, why did the GP put me on a cancer pathway because of that. What I had all along was Type 2 Diabetes, now firmly in remission. To the question at hand, President Biden. I've heard his interview about his late son and some dates. That was not forgetfulness, but confusion. On the one hand, a lot of people speculated old man President, dementia. Those answers were not someone with dementia, that's someone with confusion. There is a difference. I gather he has had some urinary problems recently, the nature of which is unknown. Forgetfulness combined with urinary problems does point to a urological issue. A colleague went through this, was told he had dementia, but later changed to bladder cancer. He was relieved, in both senses. Missed signs perhaps, to the patient, maybe meaningless (did he have a history of stones?), and, common among many hardworking people, a tendency to put things off. It reveals presidential medical exams are just medical exams. te president isn't getting special treatment, the doctors are not infallible, and a critical part of the exam is still listening to the patient (what are they say, what are they not saying). I think as well, irrespective of this case, anything serious is never divulged to the public for well founded reasons. Trump might have been given a terminal diagnosis for all I know. Its none of my business if he does. And its certainly none of the business of America's enemies if they want to exploit that fact.

You got to wonder why did that shining light on the hill turn into an Ersatz version of the 3rd Reich So when did you become a Nazi. I ask because you are acusing members of the Conservative and Unionist Part of being "far left". Your people are destroying conservative values with this sudden love of extremist religion and death cults. We threw out the religious tossers 300+ years ago.

Wait, he gets an all expenses trip paid to the UK, to go to a debating society to bitch and moan about American law. When he was in England, he was a very enthusiastic supporter of people protesting against him “They have a right to do that. Well, I hope they have a right to do that.” You have a habit pf promoting anglophobic hate media and fake news. You have deliberatelty not reported on Kirk's time at Oxford Union, which he called an A-plus Experience, while defending rapey MMA cage fighters who run prostitute rings, and supporting slavery over abortion. He's a weasel. happy to take the money and all expenses paid trip. Once back it the US, he's a snake. The berkshire hunt can stay there. No coincidence that he dined in London with the freakshow called John Mappin. Go stay in his hotel, and you will see what I mean, unless you are also a scientology freak. If you are, I comisserate, and hope you get out alive.

Its political theatre, and the "asylum seekers" are pawns. Note, they are not being fast tracked as citizens, just as refugees. Refugee status is usually canceled when there is a judgement that the reason to be a refugee is no longer there. This doesn't have to be based on hard facts, but a political determination. Hence. Afghan translators and former members of the ANA being returned to Afghanistan, following assurances from the Taliban government that they won't be taken to a football stadium and put down like dogs...... https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/dhs-terminating-temporary-protected-status-for-afghanistan Or South Sudanese feeling a civil war being returned to a civil war. Apparently 7000 white South Africans are interested in becoming refugees in the US; that leaves 4.393 million who are not interested in becoming refugees in the US. Trump, remember, loved Nelson Mandela, loaned him a plane (apparently). Its the same nonsense about creating econonmic leverage; Trump doesn't give two hoots about some Afrikaaner who barely speaks any English. His number 1 priority is always America's interests, and its not in America's interests to have non-English speaking Afrikaaner come to America to take jobs away from American farm labourers (presumably these refugees have arrived with barely the shirts of their pink or bronzed backs). But he has seen numbers about how much of the South African economy is controled by that 7%. So he thinks he can create leverage on South Africa. There's nothing South Africa makes that America really wants. But in the room with them was Elon Musk, putting on his usual constipated look. There was constant reference to him in the conversation. Its about getting Starlink access to South Africa. Elon Musk isn't an Afrikaaner; his dad came from 1st or 2nd generation English stock. His Grandad was from Minnesota. Afrikaaner kids used to beat him up at school. He "fled" South Africa rather than serving a day in the white South African Defence Force fighting poor black people (and their Cuban/German advisors) in Angola. At least, that's what he says. He was brought up in a household where his dad was nominally an inclusive, anti-Apartheid South African and a mum who was very much her father's daughter (who moved to South Africa because he thought seperation of the races was a good idea, and he didn't like Jews). As soon as the Americans get the deal they want; changes in South African company law to allow Starlink to set up, those South African refugees will find their status canceled faster than you can say Afghan Special Forces. They will rue the day they don't have Plan C,

Russian critical semiconductor plant hit https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-russia-war-live-trump-putin-eu-uk-sanctions-b2754911.html

Ah, you you like the idea of Milo Yiannopoulos (real name Milo Hanrahan), a college drop out homosexual foreigner, who has expressed views supportive of paedophillia, potentially anti-semitic, and has now, in his own words, dedicated his life to the "destruction of the Republican Party". He obtained O-1 visa status, which is usually awarded to aliens "who possesses extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or who has a demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry and has been recognized nationally or internationally for those achievements", despite possessing no formal qualifications beyond a few A-Levels, and prior to popping up in America, was completely unknown in his home country. He narrowly avoided being deported after being sacked from his job due to his views of Paedos. https://www.change.org/p/u-s-citizenship-and-immigration-services-revoke-the-us-o-1-visa-of-milo-yiannopoulos

The flouncing 47th President. 15th May: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c4ge3e7dqleo 20th May: https://news.sky.com/story/unlimited-potential-in-us-russia-trade-says-trump-after-two-hour-putin-call-13371047 21st May: https://unn.ua/en/news/sort-it-out-yourselves-nyt-found-out-what-trump-told-zelenskyy-after-calling-putin

Or not ahead or behind, but if they think laterally. Maybe they'll win a war before its started.

For all we know, the China may possess weapons the likes of which the world has never seen. Iron Dome costs $50m per battery, plus other costs. 10 batteries cover Israel. To get the same coverage in the US requires 4500+ type system, so I can see where the estimates of $250-500 billion are coming from. That requires a doubling of the defence budget. Its all Hot Air. The world knows it. Just like his supposed brilliant deal making powers. Smoke screen. He bangs on about how broke America is, how its got no money, because everyone took from it, Can't have it both ways.

Hamas didn't originate in a vacuum. Like others, such as populist politicians elsewhere, they took advantage of a crap hand and exploited genuine concerns, fears and well founded resentment for their own ends. Arguably, Ariel Sharon's ineptness in his unilateral disengagement plan (in the face of both cabinet and Knesset opposition) created the power vacuum that allowed Hamas to seize control, something ironically Netanyahu warned about. Ironically, in an effort to keep himself out of prision, Bibi then made sure Hamas got the money it needed. And here we are. Germans never attacked the Nazis. They more or less stuck with them to the end. The founders of Hamas are a whos who of people with chips on shoulders, born in either forcibly depopulated villages (aka pogroms), or refugee camps. There is an utter cycle, exploted and exploited. A sense of injustice sustained the young Israeli state during its formative years, when it had no friends in the world. For some would be Israelis, that lead them to do great things in politics, in the arts, in science, in business. But there was for some, an instinct for heinous violence (the Stern Gang, or Lehi, murdered British soldiers). Most Palestinians won't attack Hamas, like for the same reason most Palestinians won't attack Israelis. The reason being that humans aren't like that. I have never felt the urge to punch a bloke in the street, and neither have you, I suspect. In WW2, the French people, the Dutch people, the Polish people, the Czech people, never rose up en masse against the occupiers. Most got through the War living an ordinary life. Same in Iraq, and other places. The ones who pick up the guns, in any society, are always the minority.

OP is Daft as a Basil Brush. What, "locals" have to "learn" at Berkeley. Guess he went to the School of Hard Knocks and the University of Life. I can guess which side he was on, on 4th May, 1970. I suppose he is a strong supporter of the CCP's orders to the formerly Royal Hong Kong Police to open fire on protesting students who should have been studying.

Unless you were one of those voters who was working on one of the actual 747s being built as new AF1s to be told they were out of a job, as they don't need the plane now. Laurer Loomer seemed a bit put out by it. Ben Shapiro, I think he's one of them, banged on about it Mark Levin was somewhat perturbed by reports that the President was getting a plane off people he considered evil incarnate.

Quite. I don't understand the obsessing about where Sars-Cov-2 or Spanish Flu came from either.

It gets better. The fact it was for sale isn't coincidental either. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/19/politics/trump-adminstration-approached-qatar-jet Full spec from the Sale ad https://web.archive.org/web/20200905142708/https://www.amacaerospace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/200707_AMAC_Aerospace_Mini_Tech_Spec.pdf But does it still have the Northrop Grumman AN/AAQ-24(V)N Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasure (LAIRCM) system installed? https://www.flightglobal.com/business-aviation/us-clears-sale-of-ir-countermeasures-for-qatari-bbj-747-8is/134462.article Even Sam Chui covered it.

Only $100m if they choose to replace it. And there are some disputes on value. Tha't inflation for you. https://united24media.com/latest-news/ukrainian-recon-unmasks-and-destroys-russias-45m-buk-m3-air-defense-system-video-8063 Whats more important is how many they have left. Russia had about 100 Buk-M3 new builds; in principle, older variants can be reworked. They had about 400 systems to start with, but they can probably swell their numbers from Belarusan and Iranian sources.

The results of "the WW2" as you put it (in pidgeon English) involved the blokes who planned the invasion and seizure of lands being tried and hanged, and the one who started it blowing his brains out. So I have you on record; you want the entire Russian General Staff to be strung up and hope that Putin kills himself, whatever lover he has right now, along with his dog. The results of "the WW2" also involved the country who was the aggressor undergoing a 50 year occupation by foreign forces, that included the eventual political dismemberment of said country, so you are calling for the Russian Federation to be dissolved, forcibly. The process also involved the dismissal from positions of government those political devotees of the said aggressor government (the Muscovites). So, as you sit in your government funded troll farm in St Petersberg, I'd be looking for a new job soon. This one won't be paying you much more. You are a racist and sectarian pig who has repeatedly denied the right of the people of Ukraine to seek self determination. And you smell.

I'm not the Forum Police, Comrade. Presumably, you have reported the poster.

deleted

The sound of furious back pedaling by Zeliboba (Зелибоба). You slag off the Financial Times based on an anonymous forum posting that breaks forum rules. Gullible isn't in the dictionary/

He's not Russian. That's just an alter ego.