VBer

You said this based on what information?

I will repeat again, to be sent to war this Ukraine, you must appear by yourself a sign the contract with MOD (and get paid for it). This is fully voluntary. However it is similar to signing contract with the devil, because after there is no way back, you cannot cancel it. If you will, there will be a jail time. There is mandatory conscription still for 1 year service, but those personnel serving in Russia and not being sent to Ukraine. There are million ways to avoid this conscription, having a kid and being single parent is one of them.

The facts are: 1) if you don’t want to join the war, you just not going there. Participating is fully voluntary, he could normally live in Russia taking care of his daughters. 2) When money started to run out, why he just didn’t went back to home country to work and earn? There is a shortage of manpower there, salaries increasing because of that, he could provide his daughters for sure. Instead, he just preferred to stay in Thailand and doing nothing?

I'm sure that was the gathering to admire and discuss poetry of the 16'th century

In Russia supporting other side is punishable by law. First time there is a fine, second time - jail time. So you suggest that West should not step far from Russia in terms of freedom of speech and apply the same punishments?

From my opinion: -migrants from Asia -low class -foreigners -middle class - high class

It is not Russian financial institutions who frizzed assets of usual people, it was Euroclear. Assets invested locally through the same financial institutions remain fully accessible and safe. Well, lesson about property rights at West is learned.

That's absolutely right. People been buying European and US assets through brokers. There are dozens of brokers with millions customers accumulating assets, some maybe using infrastructure of bigger brokers. At end the end of this chain was Euroclear, freezing all assets. Whatever mechanism it is, people who have no any connection to state facing their investments to West frozen, and this will work as a vaccine to do not invest there in future.

If you never heard about something, that doesnt means it not exists. There are a lot of private investors at Russia who been holding foreign (mostly European and US) equities with Euroclear as the depository. All these assets are frozen now, just by passport color. Moreover, one the stock Russian exchanges (Spbexchange) been sanctioned and thousands usual people who been holding US, European, and moreover, China assets got all their funds frozen.

West confiscates property not because you said something or did something, but just because of your nationality.

Everybody in Russian politics understands that this is not going to happen, at least for the next 20-30 years. Before the war there been a knowledge that the right of private property in Europe and US is fundamental. But the West quickly proved that it been a myth, quickly confiscating property by just passport color, not bothering to know are these people have connection to the state or not. Immunization aganist keeping money and properties there will work for some decades at least.

There is an opinion if the Putin dies then there is a chance that the more harsh guy could come to power. Using tactical nukes and mass bombing to Ukrainian cities, with much more deaths. This could lead to growing current war to WW3 and the end of the world. So better to keep soft leader Putn alive 😀.

Then have nothing to say about the facts, speak about your opponent, right. You invented that, I do not think that these areas legitimately Russia now. Same as Crimea, in fact these are under control of Russia, taken against international law.

That is also lie. This is obvious to anyone who follows situation.

The numbers are hidden, but in October 2023 it was 150k confirmed. Link Compare it with 10k civilians.

The estimated deaths of civilians is around 10k (Link), while the estimated deaths in Ukrainian army is 300-400k. Civilians obviously are not the targets.

I see that you kind of satisfied with this. So can you clarify your point: it is okay to bomb apartment buildings with civilians, but only with civilians of certain nationality? Am I correct ? As for me, it is as a war crime, the same as it happened with Russian strikes. To justify crime of one side and make it legit only because another side also made crimes is a way to inhumanity.

First article is about 1993. Seriously? 😀 Another ones latest date is 2014 (10 years from now). Look like you just made it up about 5,000 organized criminal gangs, and just posted some firstly appeared links from google.

Can you please provide a link to these investigations?

Guys, can you explain something to me? I have talked with many UK or European citizens, but I have not see a single person who was happy that state money flowing to the new illegal immigrants. But your governments still doing this, despite of wishes of majority of citizens. You live in democracy, so why not choose the ones who will follow wishes of people (or force the current government to do so)?

That’s not correct. Parts being bought from Boeing or Airbus. Not directly but through third countries, there are always someone who want to make some extra buck. Moreover, Airbus and Boeing do not want for their plane to crash whatever country it belongs, so the safety issues are being fixed directly, just not publicly.

The plane keeps flying normally Flightradar24

Then have nothing to say about the topic, you should attack your opponent personally, right. These quotes are from The Guardian. The Guardian is also a Russian propaganda, okay, let it be

I think that you already realize that conscripts are not being sent to war now, but just don't want to admit it I will repeat again. Yes, it did happen in the beginning and in the situation of disarray. Its not happening now, moreover, commanders who made these orders are already punished. Can you read "in error"? Can you read this and apply basic logic? That exactly means that currently conscripts are not being send to battle, it's just someone's fears that this could happen.

Have you tried to read the article? Maybe its difficult to do at your level, but Its just proves that Im saying. I'll quote from there: Conscripts cannot legally be deployed to fight outside Russia and were in theory exempted from the September mobilisation – although some conscripts were sent to the front in error. Yes, at the beginning of there there are been cases when conscripts are sent to frontline because of disarray. But these cases are investigated and this is not happening anymore. And yes, the title is correct also, many of those who in army signed contract and left to Ukraine, so the amount of personel is decreased and need to be replenished.