save the frogs

same argument for drugs. drugs make people more creative. thats why many artists use drugs. not sure if its true.

there was a film reviewer who suggested that the possessed girl was actually sexually abused ... and the demonic possession is connected to the sexual abuse. remember the creepy drunk guy who goes to her room at the beginning of the film? well apparently he sexually abused her. not sure if it's true, but it would add an extra dimension to the film.

it's because we've become so shallow that we cannot socialize without alcohol. you nailed it.

bars are a capitalist invention. it's a hell of a lot of work to run a restaurant. if you run a bar, all you need to do is pour some drinks. and since it's highly addictive and people need a place to hang out and socialize, they'll sit there for hours drinking. incredibly easy money. it's a capitalist's wet dream to run a bar. they have even created a personality cult of famous bartenders on Netflix to make the whole drinking scene look cool to kids. and to get people into bars wasting money.

good question.

not for anyone who wants to commit suicide.

maybe thats why many guys end up dating them long-term / marrying them.

it may actually be road rage after all. just saying .... murderers cant be trusted. also, you get a lesser sentence if it's not premeditated hence the possibility of trying to pass it off as road rage even if it wasnt. i dont have any facts to work with. just speculating.

that's an interesting observation. too bad we don't have psychologists on this forum to explore that further. so is sex just a "physical" act? or what does it do to you if you have multitudes of sex partners?

i thought it was the bar girls who use that line.

that's a crucial observation. he is a property developer.

there is no euthanasia in thailand, is there? also, this case is about financial problems. the health issue is treatable.

sounds to me like people are advocating euthanasia to solve the problem of inability to pay medical bills. despite the fact that the illness is treatable. it can be debated whether it's ethical or not i suppose. i wouldnt want to be in any position to make that sort of decision.

no the argument is that there is a lack in poor parts of the world. so it's not fair to be using fresh water for poop when some people dont have fresh drinking water. the other issue is tears for fears. everybody wants to rule the world. no matter what the folks in charge do, people will complain. this is another thread that can go on forever and ever, so i'm bowing out. i do appreciate your comments.

sorry, just to play devil's advocate. just because the suspect admitted it was due to road rage doesn't mean there wasn't another motive.

no one mentioned 'you very handsum' yet?

arent many of them divorced and raising children on their own? ie single motherhood leads them to this work in some cases, no?

they may actually get rid of flush toilets at some point. do you think it's because they want to control how you poop? or maybe it's because there's a genuine lack of freshwater?

When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderfulA miracle, oh, it was beautiful, magicalAnd all the birds in the trees, well they'd be singing so happilyOh, joyfully, oh, playfully watching meBut then they sent me away to teach me how to be sensibleLogical, oh, responsible, practicalThen they showed me a world where I could be so dependableOh, clinical, oh, intellectual, cynical

haha, just noticed that someone uploaded the video clip "the planet is dying" from The Day The Earth Stood Still in the film thread. should upload it here too.

Also, just another comment. People who think climate change is a hoax and restrictive measures are just meant to control people. Restrictive measures hurt the pocketbooks of the very rich. Less travel means less money for CEOs of hotel chains and airlines, etc... They wouldn't impose these restrictive measures unless they had no choice.

As I have tried to argue, the biggest problem is that the mainstream media ONLY mentions climate change. This video by Gregg Braden discusses the work of a Swedish scientist named Johan Rockstrom. Is he a paid shill? Is he a quack? Is he a fraud? Maybe. But anyway, here goes. According to Rockstrom, there are 10 parameters that can be used to measure the state of the planet. Climate change is only one of them. Others include Biodiversity, Chemical Pollution, Acidification of the Oceans, Global Fresh Water Use, etc .. And his conclusions were that 3 out of the 10 parameters have been breached and are unsafe. Now, Gregg Braden also has a lot of weird stuff on his channel. But here is quoting the research of a Swedish scientist. If you think it's all bs, that's fine too. I don't. I think we're causing too much pollution and the population may reach 10 billion at some point. So restrictive measures are justified.

so what = there's a thread going about a guy in ICU who may have been doing just that. apart from physical suffering, there is the financial burden on family / friends.

so wherever central bank digital currency is rolled out, bitcoin will be banned?

sorry hummin, appreciate your input but i don't know. way too many complex issues i cant grasp.