Yagoda

THat was a good one, shows the utter moral bankruptcy of the Trumpophobes

lol

Well if Trump supporters are Nazis what should be done with them?

Thank you for admitting that you dont know what you are talking about.

Did you see Morning Joe defend Mike Cohens right to steal. ?

Cite the Election Act itself not what someone says it does. Now tell me whether a NY jury has the jurisdiction to make any finding as to a Federal Law. Now tell me if that is what they are charging him with, why it wouldnt be reversible error to not allow an expert on election law to trestify. If you want to play lawyer, at least know what you are talking about.

Sorry, my translation app doesnt do Bogan

Interesting criminal law issue. That shows how political this whole thing is. Only folks with an agenda stretch and twist the criminal law.

Merchands conduct sure is suspect, huh? Wonder why. Failure to allow Mr. Smith to testify is reversible error

You are one of the bigger screechers here. Judgements are only "final" after the appeals are finished. If The Magnificent Orange Mensch is convicted, then there will be an appeal. Ill wait till then, even though it will be after the election. Oh wait thats the point isnt it? Thats what show trials are for. Not that it will make a difference in November, when you really start screeching. Oh right, you aerent a Yank, so your role is just to jump when your government tells you to because we told them to. In that sense, The Giant Orange Loudmouth is gonna be your boss too...screech away!!! You accept Appellate judgements dont you? Or is that ONLY if the rule the way you want.

Well the way it used to work is that both sides present whats called "Requests to Charge". You take the Pattern Jury Instructions and gussy them up. The key when you are a Defense attorney is to try to ensure that the instructions relect your point, because if there is an aquittal, case done. Prosecutors have to be careful, because if you gussy up the instructions too much, you could get a reversal on conviction. Once the Judge has the submissions from both parties, he accepts or rejects or changes as needed. The pattern jury instructions in NY are on the NY Office of Court Admin website. They used to be in Black Three Ring binders so you could change pages when they were revised lol. Obviously each party supports their requests to charge with case law.

LOL. You woudnt pass a Bar Exam even in a give one to anybody State like Washington.

The only histrionics I have seen here is the screeching of the Trumpophobes. Readers of the whole thing here can form their own judgement. November will tell.

Standard trial practice. Has anyone see the version of the Falsus in Uno instruction that will be given?

Id be happy to lol. You havent explained what statute Trump violated. What Cohen is guilty of is meaningless when it comes to Trump. You and your ilks failure to answer the question demonstrates again to the world the farce of this situation, the vacuity of your knowledge about legal matters and law, the depth of your irrationality and the fascist, need I say dictatorial use of the legal system. I wont ask again, the point has been made. After all the testimony is in, there is still....nothing. Stalinists. The sad part is not the derangement of your movement, but the legnths you are willing to go to destroy one man even if it means you destroy the system. But thats what you all want. Like your allies prancing around screaming Death to America. Now what do do about all those pesky deplorables that wont see the light and still love their country. Thank god for the Second Amendment.

Cue: Continued inability to answer. Falsus in uno

Campaign finance violation is not an answer. Still Can't point to a statute. You lose. Even if you get a conviction it's going to be reversed on appeal. I just goes to show how low you're lot can sink. SHOW Trial

After all these pages you still can't tell me what it is. If you're going to play it's an obscure federal crime game, you better figure out the jurisdictional issues. But why bother it's all over but the shouting. Let's see what the jury says because everybody with half a brain knows what an appeals court would say

Your personal opinion is not an accord with hundreds of years of tradition and the way the law works.

No the trial is for the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump personaly made or directed a false business entry in furtherance of another crime, which has never been named.

So then you agree his trials are a farce. You need to watch CNN more

Bill Maher is on the Greg Gutfeld Show on Fox and its hysterical.

The cannibal story is my fav. Trump is gonna say Hey Joe, did the cannibals tell you how your Uncle tasted.?

Nor is the prosecution's case. Notice how quiet it is in the echo chamber. Almost time for this topic to die out anyway, Cohen is finished. Costello goes on again tomorrow. Now that we know that Bragg knew and didnt prosecute Cohen for a felony wow. Trump said today NY needs to be fixed. Now the stakes get high and the jJudge knows it. The case is already into about 9 reversible errors so: 1. Trump convicted, re-elected, reversed on appeal, special prosecutor to investigate all the violations of Federal Law, probably to include RICO based on civil rights violations, lawyer up Bragg, Fanny and Letitia, and dont think they wont squeal to save their skins. 2. Trump aquitted, relected, special prosecutor appointed to investigate all the violations of Federal Law, probably to include RICO based on civil rights violations, lawyer up Bragg, Fanny and Letitia, and dont think they wont squeal to save their skins. 3. Trump convicted defeated but reversed on appeal. they skate. Place your bets.

I be watching for crying later this week. Either way, Trump wins. Especially after calling Costello.