Jump to content

Yagoda

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    9,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Yagoda

  1. Human Trafficking is worth 20 years in the USA high, its a high level crime. And the Trump justice Department arent going to be soft on crimes like that. Just as an aside, the biggest NGO chasers of paedos here in Cambodia love American paedos. Not because they are more of them, but because its great for stats and publicity. Catch an American doing the kiddy diddle and he gets automatically whisked off to San Diego on a no bail, then will get almost guaranteed 20 years in Protective Custody. Ship a Canadian or a Brit home for that and they get 5 years and come back again.
  2. Let me educate the partisans who left a "sad" emoji to the post above: Any criminal defense lawyer that does not raise the issue of sanity in this case has failed to provide his client with effective assistance of counsel. Now you can leave your silly emojis again,
  3. The first thing that hit my just still half asleep brain this morning. I read it before I sipped my coffee so I avoided spew. Fabulous! What a great start to my day! Thanks Bob............................5555555 🙂
  4. Better to be "colonized" by primitive Russians who can be trained (plus hot women are always welcome) as opposed to be infected by the authoritarian Socialist woke deranged mind virus so prevalent in our Euro cousins. You can educate a Russian, but not a Socialist
  5. Until the feds kick down your door, then your defense lawyer will be liberty's last champion. If you're the right political party and race of course
  6. That's because you're blindness doesn't allow you to see anything other than what your masters have allowed you to think
  7. Here is the transcript. https://www.clayandbuck.com/president-trump-with-cb-from-mar-a-lago Admiration. More propagandistic lies.
  8. Do you feel the AfD should be permitted to stand in elections?
  9. Well you might feel there are other issues but the legal issues are narrow. I love the way you cant say: I support President Trumps removal of these vile terrorist scumbags from the USA. Unless you dont.
  10. Oh I'm terribly sorry so you are totally for the removal of this vile terrorist scum from the United States? That's cool. That's really the only issue other than the issue of this judge's qualifications to sit on the bench.
  11. Dont think illegals arent watching those El Salvador prison videos and saying, OK, time to go.
  12. Then you agree that the President acted in accordance with the law in deporting these aliens. Kills you to say that. OK now tell us how he violated the Court order at issue?
  13. So Article II of the US Constitution does not exist? So again, are you alleging that the Presdent does not have the power to deport enemy aliens? Why do you avoid that question? So? Wouldnt a Court order that purports to direct actions in violation of the Law be a similar breach? Or in violation of separation of powers?
  14. Oh? Really? Are you sure you understand the concept of jurisdiction? Anyone can walk into a Federal District Court anywhere and start a case? You sure?
  15. What a fabulous contribution to the discussion of a serious and arcane legal matter. Kudos to you! We are all in awe of your knowledge in this matter.
  16. Translation: I shall retire, most ungracefully with flames, because you have exposed my lack of knowledge on a subject I expounded on in my Trump hate obsession.
  17. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Oh wait I dont drink NVM
  18. I wonder if he confuses Jurisdiction and Standing, which we know are different concepts. Thats how they roll. I got one in a different topic for applauding the arrest of a child predator.
  19. OK now you are learning. Tell us what standing is then? . You dont need to answer right away, you can study. Is it only me that questions Nationwide Injunctions? You mean appealed. District Courts have "original jurisdiction". Appellate Courts do not except in very limited circumstance. What other issues would you like to discuss? You should have no difficulty besting me in a debate about US Law, and virtually anyhting else because Im not "educated" and "display little knowledge". Guess you can answer my uneducated questions easily then. Heres one, have universal injunctions been given an imprimatur by the Supreme Court? Got a case where it has?
  20. So in other words, you still have no facts, no law, just political yapping. OK, lets get down to the nitty gritty. Tell the Forum what specific statute or constitutional provision the Trump Admin violated in deporting enemy aliens?
  21. In your case, therefore, add the words "made up". Because clearly you can point to NOTHING that renders the Trump admins conduct unlawful.
  22. So you dont know what standing is? So in other words, you just spout off with no idea of what you are talking about, no basis, no knowledge of legal terms and procedures, no research into what the news reports, just spittlescreech Trump is Bad, Trump is Bad in every Topic that is worth discussing. Then flame. Got it. You can have your coterie give sad and confused emojis now.
  23. Wrong administration to do it in. Can you see some 24 year old brainwashed blue hair screaming in terror as they approach the cell in Super Max?
  24. Well then; "Getting a bit nervous at all the reversals of trumps exec orders and mass firings aren't you. Keep your seat as more are coming as Trump continues to act outside his authority. " I will let the Forum decide who might be "the knob"
  25. Which cites nothing. You must know what laws are violated if you are alleging that? Otherwise why would you make conclusions and spout them without having a basis therefore?
×
×
  • Create New...