You clearly love terrorist criminals.
https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ms-13-gang-members-sentenced-over-20-years-prison-racketeering-conspiracy
https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/18-ms-13-members-associates-sentenced-10-murders-7-attempted-murders-kidnapping
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/maryland-ms-13-gang-members-indicted-murder-aid-racketeering
https://apnews.com/article/ms13-killings-long-island-guilty-plea-649ec397315a27cd1f9c83aa21f93d75
Try reading the statute. Tell me which "lawyer" says that entering the US unlawfully is not a crime. Show us a lawyer says: A person who violates 18 USC 1325 has not committed a crime.
Why dont you tell us LOL. Even smarter on your part would be to retire gracefully
Nice how you you deliberately leave out the important language
"and the President of the United States shall make public proclamation of the event"
He did. Go find another hill to die on other than taking the side of terrorists
The US Code is enacted by Congress as the representatives of the people. If you wish to change the US code, lobby your congressman. Unlawful entry into the US is a CRIME, and anyone who says it isnt is totally and blatantly wrong.
In other words under the statute and alien that enters in violation of the statute on his first offense is guilty of a misdemeanor. That's a crime. So you can spend all time you want twisting the arguments of some immigration lawyers whose interest is making money, or you can read the statue. Find me a case that holds that people that enter illegally are not committing a crime under the statue. You won't
That's a non answer. So in other words, you haven't read the alien yet and nationalities act, nor any cases interpreting it. Are you claiming that the Constitution gives individual district judges control over foreign policy?
You really havent a clue and you were lying so here is your education. 8 USC 1325.
You blatantly lied to this entire Forum about a statue you could have read yourself
Actually they are complaining more about the blatant bias and acting outside of their jurisdiction. I dont think Impeachment is warranted. On the other hand, do you think Boasberg is unbiased and acting ethically?