Cameroni

Fair point. I suspect Harris' team will have learnt from that mistake. No wonder both are focusing on the swing states.

Kamala Harris made headlines last week when she joked in a radio interview that of course she smoked marijuana in her younger years: “Half my family’s from Jamaica. Are you kidding me?” But the crack didn’t go over well with at least one Jamaican: Donald J. Harris, her father. “My dear departed grandmothers (whose extraordinary legacy I described in a recent essay on this website), as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their grave right now to see their family’s name, reputation and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics,” he wrote. “Speaking for myself and my immediate Jamaican family, we wish to categorically dissociate ourselves from this travesty,” he added. Kamala Harris’ campaign had no comment. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/kamala-harris-father-pot-1176805 It should be noted that Donald J Harris was not a deadbeat father but took his duties as a father very seriously, until his ex wife prevented him from doing so.

Which did not matter. But true yes. In a way that made it even sweeter to see Hilary have the door shoved in her face. Would be nice if it happens again this way with Kamala.

And she famously admitted to smoking weed in an effort at identity politics which her own father called out as in bad taste.

Well, it's awesome you're privy to the interior state of the Trump family, including the daughter. When did she tell you she was "utterly creeped out"? Over croissants? Was it before or after she penned on X: "I love you Dad, today and always." https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/ivanka-trump-speaks-out-heartfelt-33238741 Doesn't look like she's "creeped out".

My God, only 4.25 billion USD now? How will he pay his electricity bill? Poor guy, only 4.25 billion USD from ONE of his companies. He's clearly in the poor house, LOL.... You guys cannot be serious.

A rapist only? You forgot Pedophile this time....hahaha

Is this the same media company valued at 5 BILLION USD? I think you'll find that IT consulting and software licensing expenses linked to the new TV streaming service are the cause of the loss. But the company will easily stomach those losses, they're playing a long term game. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/12/business/trump-medias-massive-bet-could-fix-its-biggest-problem-it-brings-in-almost-no-money/index.html I wouldn't mind if my assets shrink from 6.9 to 2.9 billion USD lol!

You don't even believe that yourself. Harris is outmatched if anything.

Because it worked very well with Biden and everyone realised that. If they keep interrupting each other everyone will be turned off. But if they don't Trump can give his bon mots to maximum effect. I think he prefers them off now since Biden.

She's not a debate Queen. She's all about looks, she'll posture, but she won't deliver convincing arguments. I dont' think she even understood the points Gabbard was making. She said Harris had put an innocent man on death row and then refused to hear new DNA evidence. Rather than deal with this accusation she replied with some general deflection "I do the real work". Nobody bought it then and nobody will buy it now.

Hahahahaha, like she destroyed sweet little Tulsi Gabbard. Oh wait, beautiful Tulsi Gabbard made her look a bit of a fool and the media laughed at her and she then dropped out of the race with 1 per cent. I can't wait to see how Harris "destroys" Trump, lol. I think you'll be in for a nasty surprise, CJ.

I don't think he really did care if the mics were on or off. He would have debated either way, because this is a close race and he is so vain he'll believe he'll win the debate easily either way. What he did care about was not to be messed around by Harris or ABC. That's why he made it clear that he'll not accept any rule change. Because even if ABC had fallen through he knows another network would have done it for him on his rules. Easy Peasy. It all makes sense.

Well since I would have been aware that this case will drag out to 2025 anyway, I would not have seen this as a big priority. And given that there were two presidential election campaigns under way I would have thought it fairer not to interfere in that process. However, that's just me, as a fair minded individual. I'm not a Jack Smith, trying to make a career out of pleasing my Democrat employers. Smith knows very well this case will drag on til 2025. Why would he have to bring the indictment now? Surely only because it's a political maneuvre to make Trump look bad, make him look like a criminal again. But this tactic is like howling at the moon. Pointless. Expeditiously? Everyone knows it will not be before 2025 that this case is decided. Assuming Trump doesn't throw it out when he's in the White House.

He's already won one though. So that will be the second one. And Harris doesn't want more then? Is she chickening out?

Food waste is a serious problem. The key is to check the fridge and freezer constantly to realise what you have and what goes bad. For some reason the spring onions bought at the market go bad within a day or two here even in the fridge. You have to do that laborious Chinese trick of putting them in water, cutting off the bad parts and covering them. Thank God for the girlfriend. Otherwise, sauces you can multi-use for pasta and mash, yes, agreed, But otherwise of course leftover mash with a fried egg and a Chinese sausage makes a great breakfast, you can get creative. I toasted one large slice of white bread too many. It got hard. Did I throw it away? No, I used the grater to make A Grade breadcrumbs for pasta and Tonkatsu.

Ummm, Trump is very much in control. Harris tried to move the goalpost and change the rules last minute in her benefit. Trump basically said "either my rules or no debate". Harris caved in. The debate will take place, but on the rules Trump wants. How is he not in control???

He seems in an awful hurry to file that indictment. I wonder why, lol.

That's right, but they don't seem to take that as very important, strangely. The Filipina had no job, no land, no nothing, no ties to Phil at all. We basically made the argument we'd never break the immigration rules because we may wish to marry and live in the UK, so we would never have any interest in breaking immigration rules. It worked. It shouldn't. But it did. I think because we were honest and followed that lawyer's advice.

But I never said Smith tried to delay it??? But why does he file the indictment now out of all periods, when the hot election campaigns are under way? Coincidence?

And of course Jack Smith, the Democrat appointee, brings this in the hot phase of the election campaign period. The sole aim is to discredit Trump, but that card has been played too often. They should know by now Trump is immune to this.

It's a non story, the Supreme court ruled presidents have robust immunity, so Jack Smith had his papers graded and was told he failed, so he's doing a resit now, having exercised all the portions he thinks he got wrong the first time around. However, this case would drag to 2025 at least, by which time Trump will be in the White House and will dismiss the case, as he has a legal right then. And immunity for it, thanks to Jack Smith and the Supreme Court.

With UK immigration it's important to always be honest. I went to see a lawyer at a top UK law firm about bringing my Filipina into the UK, we had the option to rely on somewhat massaged employment documents, but the lawyer counselled against it. He said just tell the truth. Even though she had no job at all it was not a problem and that lawyer was right, though he said it could have gone either way. She got the visa and was able to come into the UK. Of course she turned out to be a cheating skank, so that could be a much bigger problem.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/white-house-says-facebooks-steps-stop-vaccine-misinformation-are-inadequate-2021-07-16/ But FACEBOOK killing people? Really?

How about Biden saying Facebook was killing people during Covid?