Cameroni

So true, all these keyboard activists have a big mouth online and in real life they play the SIMs.

You should really start reading your own link more thoroughly. From the Lend Lease link you quoted: "....about 7,000 Lend-Lease tanks (plus more than 5,000 British tanks) were used by the Red Army," https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease Of course even if it had been 13000 it would not have mattered. The Soviet Union produced 119,769 tanks and SPGs herself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_industry_in_World_War_II Stalin's cigar musings are not required, because we have actual figures for Soviet production and Lend Lease shipments. Russia received 18200 aircraft through Lend Lease, but herself built 136,223 aircraft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_industry_in_World_War_II

I was amazed the assassination attempt was not asked about by the ABC moderators

I read it 3 times before you came along, you should read it to learn that Russia received 7000 tanks from Lend Lease, but itself produced 100,000 armoured vehicles. So the figures do not bear out your argument.

Total garbage. Russia produced 100,000 armoured vehicles during the war years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_combat_vehicle_production_during_World_War_II

Not looking at the judgements in the cases you mentioned, not a single judge called him a "thief".

I just saw the world's foremost expert on international relations, a 10 year officer in the US Air Force, John Mearsheimer, say that the Kursk offensive was a blunder, the reason that the Ukrainians were able to penetrate there was that there was hardly any Russians and all it achieved was to make Russian advances on the main front even easier. With the blunders Ukraine is making, just my opinion, Ukraine is not really making the best use of its limited resources. Mearsheimer also said though that Russia will not defeat Ukraine uncondintionally, rather, Ukraine will become a rump state.

Krushchev had reason to ingratiate himself with Western leaders. Rather than his opinion a detailed look at Soviet production figures will suffice to show that Lend Lease was not a decisive factor, whereas Soviet production was.

So you also would like to see your political opponents murdered? Like Routh?

It wasn't a theft case. It was breach of fiduciary duty and lots of other things. But not theft.

So you would "not mind" if another human being is murdered because of their politics. You do realise the irony to say something like this on this thread? You understand this puts you right next to people like the psychopath Routh who wanted to kill a person due to a political mania?

It wasn't a cancer charity, it was his own foundation that he founded and funded out of his own pocket mostly! And he did pay money back. The judge commended him for it, or rather his lawyers. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6542108-trump-foundation-decision.html

It wasn't a "theft" case, it was a breach of fiduciary duty case.

The Trump charity case was dimissed when the lawyers agreed to settle the dispute, ie Trump paid for a portrait out of his own pocket. At most it was breach of fiduciary duty, not theft. What kind of theft is this where the "thief" pays back all the money in dispute? The University case related to lawsuits centered around allegations that Trump University defrauded its students by using misleading marketing practices and engaging in aggressive sales tactics. Again, nothing to do with any judge calling Trump a "thief". This never happened, but I guess we will not get any apologies.

That was a breach of fiduciary duty, nowhwere does the judgement say "thief". Besides, the action was dismissed when Trump agreed to pay money owed resulting from the breach. What kind of "thief" pays money back? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6542108-trump-foundation-decision.html

That claim was circulated in social media by people in Springfield, a very easy mistake to make to be misled by fake news online. What, he deserves to die because of this?

So you're another one who wants to see political leaders killed?

Kindly post the court judgement which says Trump is a "thief". If you can't, you should probably apologise.

Another good example, "Oh anyone who disagrees with me is a troll...no a Russian troll...a Russian troll who lives on a troll farm".... It's this kind of childish discourse that creates an atmossphere of hatred as welll. A presidential candidate was just the subject of an assassination attempt, and you're accusing posters who are neither trolls nor Russian of being "Russian trolls"? Because they disagree with you. Where did you get socialised?

And vile insults like this create the atmosphere in which these lunatics believe they are justified to kill their antichrist. I would urge to moderate your language when you talk about Trump, to calm the current climate.

Imagine, we'd never hear the end of it, Russian intereference, a new dossier would pop up...

You got to follow the money, Matthew Crooks did register as a Republican, but actually he donated to Democrat causes...So he was a Democrat supporter... Crooks’ political leanings were not immediately clear. Records show Crooks was registered as a Republican voter in Pennsylvania, but federal campaign finance reports also show he gave $15 to a progressive political action committee on Jan. 20, 2021, the day Biden was sworn into office. https://apnews.com/article/trump-assassination-attempt-thomas-matthew-crooks-shooter-881581c46c07025898027143fc9132e5 Interestingly history repeated itself here, the psycho Routh also first voted Truimp then switched his allegiance to the Democrats. We should probably keep an eye on Adam Kinzinger.

I reckon it's Bob.

It's a shame the Democrats have lost their way now, whereas before they supported the Deplorables, the poor and the working man, now it's all bribes to the middle class and we look down on everyone else, except our billionaire donors. Of course the propensity to murder your political opponents also appears to emanate from the left of the spectrum. So sad.

That's a very good point, I regularly follow Project 3 of 7, and these rednecks talk more sense than any Democrat activist and despite having guns coming out of their ears seem far more peaceful and reasonable than the Gen Z unhinged Democrat supporters you see online. Of course you have to close your ears when these rednecks talk about religion, but overall they seem an intelligent group. Well, Project 3 of 7 anyway.