Cameroni

Lol, a case dismissed, and not proven. Debunked in full here: https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863 Again, anybody can file a legal case at any time in the US, and make any affidavit they choose. However, in this instance, the case was obviously based on lies and was dimissed. A detailed history of the FALSE rape allegations against Donald Trump from the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow

Yes, indeed from six years ago, where they just announced that yet another acuser had come forward, in 2019, which underlines how these "survivors" have come out in regular waves over the years, and long after the plea deal that was made. So that deal never had the full information and was done prematurely obviously. The Observer appears to have given in to the urge to portray Epstein as having worked for intelligence, purely for sensationalist sales figures and purely based on the Daily Beast reporter Lucy Ward's allegation that Epstein was given the ple deal by Acosta because the latter was told that Epstein was working for the FBI. When Acosta publicly ridiculed this notion and states that much of the reporting is going down a silly "rabbit hole", the Observer reporter then claims this is not a firm denial and he basically assented to Ward''s allegation that Epstein worked for the FBI. Which is outright false, and again done because it sells and puts bums on seats. Lucy Ward from the Daily Beast has not provided one shred of credible evidence that Epstein was working for the FBI as an informant, and Acosta himself has denied that he made this statement and that Ward's report is nonsense ("going down a rabbit hole"). I'm in no way wedded to any "fixed position". If you have any credible info Epstein worked for the FBI, then kindly provide it, and happy to consider it. As always, all I'm wedded to is the truth. And neither this website's document, nor Lucy Ward's allegation are credible proof Epstein worked as an informant for the FBI. Doesn't mean he didn't, of course, but in the absence of any real evidence for this, I'd be reticent to make the claim.

That article is a bit strange. In the Acosta quote he clearly is refuting Ward's allegation that he gave Epstein a lenient deal because Epstein worked for intelligence ("going down a rabbit hole"), and yet the article claims Acosta did not deny it. Bizarre reporting. Clearly, one of the main reasons the Epstein matter is being kept alive is that news outlets want this to be the case, because Epstein puts bums on seats, and the murkier and more contradictory and unclear the allegations, the more there is to write about, and the greater the audience will be. Surprised to see the Observer succumbs to this too.

There's a famous experiment where people are shown moving around energetically in a video clip, with a man dressed as a gorilla in their midst. About 50% of respondents did not see the man in the gorilla costume after they were interviewed. When I was a lawyer and I conducted my first real trial I was struck by how the truth does not matter at all in a legal case. What matters is what you can document and prove with evidence. Though I won the case, I was shocked how easy it would have been for the other side to win, if they'd lied better and if I didn't have such good evidence.

It wasn't just Acosta, a number of people were involved in that decision, Acosta just became the focus of attention. The main reason why the plea deal was so lenient was because the FBI was negligent and had not obtained all the information at the time the plea deal was made. Much of it came out after the plea deal. The FBI was actually sued by the "survivors" who alleged, quite rightly, that the FBI did not do its job in this investigation. So the FBI itself wanted this case to go away quietly. At the time I think Epstein was just viewed as someone who'd had sex with teenagers, a small number of whom were under age. The whole sex trafficking and the wild and outlandish claims by "survivors", most of which were false, only came later. Plus Epstein was charismatic, rich, and well connected, that no doubt played a role, he had great lawyers. One should not forget that most of the girls in this case willingly accepted Epstein's money and consented to sex with him, as well, and only a very tiny minority were actually 14 or 15. Most were over the age of consent.

Well, if you actually read the document you will see it does not prove that Epstein was an "FBI Informant". The deal referred to is the very well known plea deal. The information provided to the FBI obviously relates to information provided to the FBI in the course of the investigation, not in the case of Epstein working as an "FBI Informant". Again, had Epstein been an FBI informant you can be sure that he would have broadcast that loud and clear in his defense. And we know from Dershowitz, his lawyer, that Epstein told him he has no ties to any intelligence agencies whatsoever. There's a ton more documents like this btw on the FBI website, knock yourself out: https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

Lol, the "agreement" refers to the plea deal he had. "Information" just means the information he provided to the FBI in the course of the investigation.. This website just went on the FBI website, where this has all been publicly available for ages, as seen here: https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein Ask yourself this, IF Epstein had been working for the FBI, why would he not have mentioned that in his defense? And why did he tell Dershowitz categorically he had no ties with any intelligence agency, when he was a client of Dershowitz? That he wished it were so as he'd get a great deal then?

Can you engage your brain for just one second, if Epstein had been working for the FBI, do you not think he would have mentioned that in his defense? Alan Dershowitz, who represented Epstein in the Florida case, told Business Insider that Epstein told him he didn't have ties to intelligence agencies. "He said 'absolutely no.' He said he wished he did, that it would've been very helpful" to get an even better deal, Dershowitz says. "If he had had any connection to any governmental agency whatsoever, I would be the first person to know about it." The specific claim that Epstein was recording sexual acts involving his associates comes from statements that Sarah Ransome, one of Epstein's accusers, made in 2016. Ransome later admitted that she made it up. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-spy-epstein-files-intelligence-asset-trump-bondi-2025-7

"Sign up for your daily dose of dope"...yah, this looks like a very serious news source. Lol.

You probably didn't update the OS then, I've been using MS for 27 years and haven't been "hacked" once. And I doubt you were "hacked" twice, frankly.

Lol, yeah sure. You believe anything she tells you, I see. So it had nothing to do with the fact that her whole case was a tissue of lies and she could never have won it, right, right. Right, let's not believe what actual witnesses who really saw what went on in Camp Epstein say, but let's instead believe anonymous people making outlandish accusations they can't prove in court.. Lol. What a sad porridge of falsehoods you post, Will. Just pitiful.

Amazing, sounds almost exactly like Rock around the Clock. So Hank Williams was the father of Rock n Roll. You don't hear that a lot.

Yeah, they can actually, you just need to download CX File on the Android Box. Anyhthing on your laptop can then be opened on the Android Box. Clueless.

Lol, you're posting this on Aseannow. You do realise that everything you post on Aseannow is fed into an algorithm that tailors its adverts on Youtube to the words you post here? If you think with Linux you're insulated from "spying" on the internet or from OS vulnerabilities you have a screw loose.

Well, we all know why you make the false claim this anonymous woman, whose case was dismissed, and who was clearly NOT a verified Epstein victim, was raped by Donald Trump. The same reason why Xylophone posts the lies he posts. You guys don't care about the truth. And you have no qualms to smear people with outright falsehoods and proven lies. Nevermind that Ghislaine Maxwell said that Trump never behaved inappropriately with anyone whilst he was with Epstein and her, as per the news today. Absolutely pathetic.

Common law is a type of law of in its own right. It's made by judges.

That's utterly pathetic really, but congratulations, you've joined Xylophone in posting outright lies. The affidavit you refer to comes from a legal filing dismissed in 2016. A subsequent lawsuit from the same anonymous claimant was dropped in 2016. The claimant has not been heard from since. The anonymous person has nothing whatsoever to do with Epstein, and is not one of the verified Epstein victims. Indeed she was never a victim at all, as her case was dismissed, but was rather one of the many women trying to cash in on the Epstein scandal. Her papers are not part of the Epstein files. In the US anyone can file a legal case at any time and write anyhting they want in any affidavit. Doesn't make it true of course. The only verified victims in the Epstein case that were accepted as under age were 14 and upwards. The full story of the fake Ms Doe legal case is here, and has been debunked in full. https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863 In recent news today, Ghislaine Maxwell has said she never witnessed Trump do anything inappropriate whatsoever.

Again, "case law". Also known in the English legal tradition as "Common Law". Common Law is a gigantic part of English jurisprudence and is made by judges. Read yourself more educated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_law

Anyone who uses Linux is a total fool. You're basically unable to use newer hardware because Linux won't be compatible. A large number of software is not compatible with Linux. You'd really have to be touched in the head to run Linux. As for Linux being safe, it's a total myth, a large number of Linux vulnerabilitiies are known and are constantly discovered.

Listen, by posting outright lies you just devalue your brand. How is anyone ever going to believe anything you say? The youngest documented person involved in the Epstein scandal was 14. There were no 12 or 13 year olds. So stop posting nonsense. And no, Epstein was not a pedophile, he never touched prepubscent girls. He just liked young teenagers, like Jerry Lee Lewis, Elvis, and Chuck Berry.

No, they make law. It's called case law. Precedents, which are the keys to interpreting laws.

You implied with DNA evidence there's no doubt. That's not the case.

Notbush City Limits doesn't look Rock n' Roll to you?

Yes, indeed, as we saw in the US recently, but the same happened in the UK. Judges everywhere have huge political significance, in the EU too of course.

Agreed, I have no problems with it. Just don't like the hobbled together nature of the new layouts. I liked it when things were separated properly, like in Win 7. Segregation is greatly underrated. Only a bloody fool would run Linux, obviously.