Cameroni

Some good points Andrew makes, albeit marred by his pathological narcissim toward the end. He's wrong on one thing, that the superhot Thai girls only do Thais. Some actually prefer the farang. But I also overpay the old woman sometimes if the noodles are delicious, same same.

The shelters are completely pointless of course. What if they really went to war, Russia is a nuclear power. What would Germans do, live in shelters all their life? It's ludicrous. The only viable option is for Germany to get nuclear weapons then Russia woudln't dare invade. Not that they have any intention to start with anyway. This whole exercise is just fear mongering.

Yah, I think your moral compass is a bit defective if you want to say expulsion from school and a police record is a fitting punishment for what this boy did.

No. I really don't get it. I don't get why people get so worked up about some digital fake photos showing things that never happened. It's almost as if the world has gone crazy.

That Miss Grand hat a very, very rich Thai bf. She left him because he was "too demanding". I realise she was probably cheating with the Ukrainian. But still.

Oh I know. Indeed pretty much every country has passed these laws that criminalise artistic representations of porn, long before AI become fashionable. Now with AI it seems to have gone completely overboard, 7 years in jail in S Korea. Are you telling me this is a proportionate and measured punishment? To lock a boy up for 7 years if he made some porn with AI that is not even real? By "sexual targeting" you mean the digital creation of fake images showing acts that never happened in real life, correct? I never said that was a "prank". But of course they will get over it. It's not a real act like a physical assault. It's a thought crime, that fantasizes and creates an AI image of things that never happened in reality. Which causes no physical harm whatsoever. Among 15 year olds, as among most children, attempts at humiliation and defamation are sadly the norm, as you well know. No, it's not. There is no real physical harm. At most there is some annoyance, embarassment, some psychological discomfort of a passing nature. Not at all. This was not physical abuse. This was an AI photo showing things that never happened. Nor am I "excusing" it, I'm merely viewing it in a proportionate way, without the white knight hysteria some have put on display here.

You're living in the 1950s. In 2025 the Thai girl will leave the Thai bf if he so much as looks at her wrong.

The kamikaze had to sacrifice their lives. For whom? For the women at home.

Yes, lucky I was able to avoid that, as we had an amicably divorce and settled it privately without the state.

I succeeded in not marrying a 64 year old woman the way Bono has. And my chick is twice as beautiful as his.

Such an unattractive man, Bono. His music was absolutely cack as well. But the chicks loved the music. Why? It always puzzled me.

Go with God, brother.

If your wife is loyal and not mercenary, what's the problem?

It's not their genius, it's just society has a credo. That credo is "men have to sacrifice for women". That's what the Kamikaze were all about. And that's what every man everywhere is taught. You need to sacrifice. For women. So it was only viewed as natural that the woman, who had paid not a dime towards the house, which I had paid for entirely, deposit and monthly repayment, it was only viewed as natural that I should sacrifice half of my assets. For her. Because she did the dishes. And well, you know, she's a woman.

It's unlikely. It could be, because that woman could have a very low sexual market value, and possibly adopt the male mating strategy of provisioning, however, if she is still attractive, she would most liikely only date someone who can improve her life, ie with money and status or the like. Absolutely right, as a man hits 30 he's at or approaching his financial peak, which is why women prefer men of that age. Of course any woman looking at marriage will only choose a guy who has a superior earning capacity to hers. As a rule. There are are exceptions. No, it's not bad. It's actually a very good thing that women only choose the most competent and most well off males they are able to choose. That's how the human race has advanced. Imagine if they chose someone like JakeC. Doesn't bear thinking about. Where would humanity be then?

No that's transactional. People only enter into relationships when they want something from the other. That can be money, but it need not be, it can be attention, it can be social status, it can be a lot of things, however, usually, with women, it's money. Now, I've had relationships outside of Thailand, and they do start out as non-transactional, simply beacuse it is bad form to spell out the transaction, but in the end, it cost me half my house, which I'd solely paid for with my own genius. So yes, whilst for some time, those relationships can seem non-transactional, in terms of money, usually they are not. Even if it does not go south, you'd still be supporting the wife, paying the mortgage, her food, gifts, etc.

That statement is false.

Bit like they don't view their property as your property.

So 7 years jail for a fake digital pic showing things that never happened, school expulsion and a police record are a "measured" response? Maybe in Crazyland. I'm not "underreacting". I'm reacting proportionately. You're overreacting.

Hardly. If she built up sufficient respect, dignity and trust among peers, those peers would recognize that those pics are just fake and it would not have a great impact on her reputation among her "peers". Did I digitally asssault you perhaps? Lol. You are so full of it. You couldn't judge me if your life depended on it. What depravity? Talking about fake AI images of things that never happened? Oh yes, shocking depravity there. lol. What "real" damage? A passing annoyance? Or a passing embarrassment? What "lasting impact"? Stop talking nonsense, Richard. Yes, I know how it works, thanks, but those girls never engaged in those acts, so what was depicted never ever happened. It's like fantasy. It feels like I'm in a real life fairytale where everyone is saying the emperor is wearing clothes and I'm the only one seeing reality. The trauma of seeing your face on pics depicting acts you were never involved in. Yeah, I think they'll get over it. Hahahahahahaha...digital assault...thanks Richard, i could use the laughs... digital assault....lol. ..priceless. You clearly have some moral disconnect if you want to ruin a 15 year old boy's life, have him expelled from school and involve police, for a fake nudie pic depicting acts that never happened as depicted. Obviously not, repeat offences warrant harsher punishment. By which I mean school sanction btw, not CIA waterboarding. Let's not conflate this with a REAL act. This boy did not such thing. He merely created digital art. An imaginary boundary in fake Bizarro world that is not real, where acts that never happened are sanctioned. Absolutely f***ng crazy.

It was a simple question, what reputation have 15 year olds built up? Spare me your sanctimonious nonsense. So she'll have plenty of time to build her confidence and social standing. Nobody's saying they're "unaffected" what I'm saying is that the relatively minor shocks to their self esteem will pass fairly quickly at that age. Generating FAKE sexual images of acts that never happened! Pretty much, it's almost harmless. Lol "digital assault", now you've jumped out of the bush, lol. No to involve police and demand expulsion is fantastically over the top. You want to ruin a buy's life at 15 because he created a fake nudie pic? What are you crazy? Real acts would, fake imagery should warrant minor disciplinary action at most. By theschool. Not police. I think your thought processes are fundamentally disturbed if you want to ruin a 15 year old boy's life with school expulsion and police, because he created some fake digital nudie pics. That's insane.

Look let's keep our feet on the ground here. This boy made some explicit digital art. Rather than making him out to be some sexual predator, perhaps we should nourish his IT talent instead of nipping it in the bud, just redirect it. I have dated a fair number of girls in Thailand and Phil, I would guesstimate that at leasat 98% were serial daters. It's a majority of the female population. Of course social media and dating apps have a lot to do with it. But at 15 there's a pretty good chance she'll have plenty of time to build up her self esteem. Hopefully not with sexy dance videos on Tik Tok.

Well, at least she's past the age for having affaris, so you're safe there.

Sorry, but it's a giant chasm between ridiculing girls and being a sexual predator. Two very different things. That will probably happen anyway, it's inevitable. I doubt it very much. Which like 7 years in S Korea is completely over the top. In what way? They're 15.

We don't know if these girls were so innocent, but even if they were, they still are then, it's not like this boy made them do these acts in real life! These are just AI pics, fake pics! I would just ask the school to sanction the boy in some way, but not to expel him or get the police on him. AI pics that are like fantasy digital art are not that serious an offence. Seven years prison for that is quite frankly insane.