illisdean

You must be getting confused by all this and thinking about Biden. I certainly know of no theft of document charges against former President Trump. When was he charged for theft of documents? The docs that the PRA grants him absolute plenary powers to declassify and possess, meaning ANY presidential records, docs, and so on but please share the document theft charges you are fantasizing about. FYI, a little analysis of the ongoing court dates stick handling could reveal a brilliant strategy playing out, right into the hands of yours truly. You can start by thanking the judge in Florida and her recent ruling(s). Think a little on it and consult with your informed colleagues to guide and advise you and don't forget the theft of document indictment.

Despite all the above diatribe about New York Executive Law § 63(12) against Trump, this is about Cohen, a convicted felon and ardent advocate for "perjury". https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/10/25/trump-ex-fixer-michael-cohen-admits-to-lying-under-oath-in-testy-fraud-trial-testimony/?sh=46050c4e632d

Is "fast and loose" contained within the New York Executive Law § 63(12)? Or in ANY civil or criminal statutes in your world. Show me where it is.

You seem. convinced by gaslighting about the IRS in your deceptive postings absent any proof of anything you say.

U refer to IRS, and then obfuscate, you need to make some serious adjustments.

I see where Trump and the IRS clashed on asset valuations but nothing criminal or fraudulent occurred according to the civil complaint filed by James or any subsequent actions by the IRS, so in essence "blowing smoke " nothing-burgers. Show me the IRS tax fraud investigations of Trump relating to bank finance activities and fraud. There are none, there, solved again for you.

Maybe you illustrate this with some examples and actual cases. Are you aware of the crime fraud statutes, and that fraud is a crime except when it isn't?

Stop lying and trying to mislead with your false statements. Back up your statements with some clear evidence and corroboration or try to find another platform to fuel your insecurities and inadequacies. "In 2013, the bank’s underwriters adjusted Trump’s net worth by about 50% from more than $4 billion to roughly $2.65 billion." https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/28/politics/deutsche-bank-trump-fraud-trial-testimony/index.html “We are expected to conduct some due diligence and verify the information provided, to the extent that is possible,” David Williams, a banker in the wealth management group at Deutsche Bank, said on Tuesday. He said repeatedly that the bank had performed that diligence and factored its own analysis into the relationship with Mr. Trump." https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/29/nyregion/trump-fraud-trial-deutsche-bank.html David Williams, who worked on at least one of three loans Deutsche Bank made to Trump in the years before he was elected president, testified Tuesday that it’s “atypical, but not entirely unusual” for the bank to cut a client’s stated asset value by 50% and approve a loan anyway, as it did with Trump. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-28/deutsche-bank-executive-gives-trump-potential-boost-in-ny-trial

I think you are making this up as you go along. You have some evidence or reference to this claim Trump "telling the IRS he was losing money" and exactly what the crime is in losing money? Trump AFAIK has no issues with the IRS, but maybe you know something you can share. If Trump got in front of the tax police they would skin him alive. So quit making up nonsense. Focus on the one of the issues in the civil case, the recent testimony from one of Trump's biggest lenders, Deutsche Bank. These links should help walk you thru it. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-trial-victim-deutsche-bank-shuns-f-word-2023-11?op=1 https://www.businessinsider.com/except-for-fraud-donald-trump-was-good-deutsche-bank-borrower-2023-10?op=1

Ok, so they did use Trumps valuations, or maybe they didn't? Do you know, or even bother to confirm your claims? Are there not clauses in financial contracts which include disclaimers for parties to conduct their own due diligence and to not accept the claims presented? Of course there are. At any rate the Deutsche bank testified they did not rely on Trump evaluations. Even if they did, it's not up to the state AG's to suddenly become real estate appraisers and experts. Ludicrous on its face. And likely unconstitutional. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/29/nyregion/trump-fraud-trial-deutsche-bank.html

I think you said that already, nothing to learn, it's quite obvious to a rational and casual observer except you. A picture can speak "watch and learn" for you. I'll help you out here... Enjoy. Enjoy.

As is Biden's ratings and job approvals, a positive correlation.

Unfortunately for Biden he's failed where it counts most with voters, the economy. "Bidenomics" and its intended message is getting flushed down the toilet along with Bidens ratings. Check it out. Biden has a lot of fixin up to do when he's not on vacation at the beach. " WASHINGTON — No one seems to like “Bidenomics,” the eponymous shorthand for Joe Biden’s economic policies — not voters, not Democratic officials, not even, at times, the president himself. It’s a term that mystifies Americans and confounds even its namesake. “I don’t know what the hell that is,” Biden said in a speech in Philadelphia earlier this year." Links: https://news.gallup.com/poll/544808/poor-marks-biden-middle-east-economy-foreign-affairs.aspx https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/bidenomics-rcna122865

Impeachment inquiry is sufficient to get the truth on Biden's corruption.

"Interviews with a diverse group of striking autoworkers and other voters in the critical battleground state of Michigan this week highlighted Biden’s troubles: Many of them had voted for him in 2020 and appreciate that he joined the picket line Tuesday. But several were frustrated with his handling of high prices and other economic issues — and not yet sold on voting for him again next year." Tone Woods, a Black building trades worker from Detroit, said he is also undecided after voting for Biden in 2020. He attended Trump’s speech Wednesday in the Detroit area. “Gas is high. Inflation. So that’s why I’m stuck in the middle,” he said. He is considering Trump because “the economy was a little better when Trump was in office, to be honest with you.” https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/29/white-house-bidenomics-failure-00118949 Bidenomics high inflation is also making history, highest in 40 years.

The classification status of documents is moot, nonexistent, except to create the predicate for the proverbial FBI nose under the tent. The DOJ got a warrant to look for classified documents, but never intended to use classified documents as a case cornerstone because President Trump had full declassification authority. The DOJ got a search warrant by convincing a judge they were looking for something that wasn’t even a violation of law. That’s why the DOJ would not reveal the probable cause affidavit. The search was built upon a fraudulent pretense. “Classified” is a snipe hunt.

Yes, PRA is mentioned in the affidavit the DOJ wanted buried, BUT not in the indictment and there are ZERO indictments concerning classified docs. Right, you get it now?

Actually, ONLY the AFFIDAVIT for the Mar-a-Lago search was based on the non-crime of PRA classified docs in Trumps possession, it was the only way the DOJ could get a warrant in search of a crime, and then refused to release the AFFIDAVIT until Trump appealed and the judge ordered a redacted version to be released. How many times is the PRA mentioned in the affidavit or indictment? The majority of the charges in the Mar-a-lago case are based on the espionage act of 1917, (31/37 counts), and obstruction, false statements. The PRA is not a criminal statute and the FPOTUS cannot be charged for possessing presidential records classified or otherwise. A senator or VP can though and should, unless your name is Biden. The DOJ counsel requested Trump securely store docs at Mar-a-Lago until further notice. (see attahed jpg) Affidavit https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22267188/mar-a-lago-affidavit.pdf

It has increased debt annual interest payments to almost $1T now, more than national defense spending, social security, Medicaid.etc. More than doubled since Biden was sworn in.

One thing for certain is Biden's competency will not improve but get worse if that's even possible. He can go lower, and he will. The Biden crime family will be getting interrogated (under oath) by congressional investigators next month and who knows who caps immunity and sells out the corrupt leader of the family syndicate

Your comments are those from one who is dripping with desperation and detached from reality. Biden will not make it to the election and if he does he will lose. He's incompetent and the majority of voters agree. Check the curve in the attached graph, positive slope, getting worse day by day for your failed leader Biden, He's viewed as incompetent, you may not like it, but facts are facts and they are hard to swallow for some. https://news.yahoo.com/2024-poll-trump-takes-lead-amid-growing-concerns-about-bidens-age-and-competence-100001250.html?guccounter=1

Hypotheticals, you are on your own. Enjoy Biden's toilet run.

None of which concerns the voters ahead of the 2024 election. Do better. Question: are you better off now compared to 3, 4 years prior? Voters know, they feel Trump helped them more while Biden hurt them more. Seems Biden, despite his accomplishments according to you don't resonate where it matters most, with the voters. Links October 2023 Times/Siena Poll Biden’s poll numbers have gotten worse

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-vs-biden-poll-2024-presidential-election-year-out/ IF...a big FAT if, Biden makes it to Nov 24 as nominee, he's got ZERO to run on except bashing Trump whom American voters are showing more approval on all metrics except maybe abortion. My bet is he's officially albeit suspiciously dropped from the ticket after the Aug DNC.

The election is less than a year off and a lot can happen. But what's interesting - and I think significant - is if you look at 2016 and 2020, Trump never once touched 46% support during either campaign. He's currently at 47.2% Stick the fork in Biden, he's DONE. Everyone knows it except him 2016 https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html 2020 https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_biden-6247.html 2023 NOV https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2024/president/us/general-election-trump-vs-biden-7383.html