MangoKorat

Is this a report on the rock band's deportation or is it a general news roundup? The report is all over the place.

If this is an example of AI, god help us all.

On 1/30/2024 at 2:41 PM, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

So from that Thai article, translated by Google, the cases seem to involve Don Mueang Airport and at least one immigration officer there, who according to the translation got a end result sentence of;

 

"According to Section 78 of the Criminal Code, imprisonment for each count will be 3 years and 4 months, a total of 14 counts, for a total of 42 years and 56 months in prison."

Just another example of the poor reporting/translations of news we seem to be getting here on a regular basis recently. 

The headline states 'Immigration Officer gets 42 years' - which suggests one officer.

The report itself goes on to state:

On 1/29/2024 at 9:56 PM, webfact said:

The court, in a verdict dated December 20, 2023, found the police officers guilty of various charges, resulting in a combined sentence of 42 years and 56 months.

22 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

but for others to call for 'legal charges' does start to smell of xenophobic over-reaction...  If it was a Thai guy would the same sanctimonious puritans ask for clarification of charges ?

A phenomenon created I'm afraid, by the internet and in particular, social media.

On 1/28/2024 at 10:56 PM, Skipalongcassidy said:

This is from the british National Crime Agency... so according to you who cannot spell or type correctly... they are harming themselves... rubbish... uk is number 4 offending country and the 3 countries outpacing  uk are all former british empire 

Number 4 in recorded crimes perhaps, that does not necessarily reflect the true position and I would suggest, almost certainly does not.  There is no justification whatsoever for any theories that suggest that paedophilia is more prevalent amongst any race or type. 

Perhaps you know nothing of the practice in some Muslim countries, for example, of 'marrying' a young girl for a day - simply for the purpose of having sex with her and then divorcing her the next day? This practice, known as 'Pleasure Marriages' has been the subject of televison investigation in Iraq where local Imams often arrange such things with girls as young as 14 or possibly younger.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/06/pleasure-marriages-iraq-baghdad-bbc-investigation-child-prostitution

In the same country, around 7% of (normal) marriages are to girls under 15 - something that is abhorent in many societies.

https://www.girlsnotbrides.org/learning-resources/child-marriage-atlas/regions-and-countries/iraq/

The above is not in any way an attack on the Muslim faith per se, they are simply explanations of just 2 ways in which what would in many countries be considered paedophilic practices, are covered up.

Such things go on all over the world - closer to home, you might look into what goes on after dark in many Thai villages. You cannot base your crude ideas solely on what is reported.

Finally, you might note that crticising someone's typing or spelling is against forum rules.  I think I know how to spell 'countries' thanks - it was simply a typo as, I'd suggest, most would recognise. Again your criticism only damages yourself.

Before you make sweeping statements, you might wish to consider the accuracy of your claims.

On 1/27/2024 at 12:21 AM, Skipalongcassidy said:

Another brit in denial... all you have to do is a little research to show that... 

  

Number of British pedophiles may be far higher than thought

 National Crime Agency chief says new figure is seven times greater than earlier estimate

And its just as likley to be far higher than reported in all countres. Don't spout such uneducated nonsense, you only harm yourself.

46 minutes ago, Goat said:

Not limited but Brits are famous for it and statically higher than in other countries. I think their legal system being so leniant they think they can get away with it. And many do for years or decades in plain sight, Saville, Glitter, priests etc.

 

This softly softly approach where they talk about rehabiltating them rather than jailing them is absurd.

 

It maybe "racially profiling" but when i have met English "teachers" in Thailand I always assume the worst of them.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/uk-prisons-jail-paedophiles-not-big-enough-capacity-police-warning-a7178851.html

Another load of utter rubbish.  I'd suggest you base your accusations on the news that you read.  I doubt you ever read news in, for example, the Turkish language?

These things happen all over the world - sometimes they are news, sometimes they are covered up.

You're British right?  Then the Chanotte is the same as we call Title Deeds and details the ownership plus any liens, charges or restrictions pertaining to the property. The House Book (Tabien Baan) simply details the people registered as living there - it is not in any way a proof of ownership.

A Chanotte title has been officially measured and located by GPS with boundary markers installed.  I believe (not 100%on this), that a Nor Sor 3 Gor is also officially measured but has not been fully confirmed and located by GPS and the boundary markers installed.  A Nor Sor 3 Gor can be converted to a Chanotte and is usually classed as 'waiting for this' but it can be a lengthy process - although I think its sometimes possible to 'speed' that up with a little 'sweetener'.

Both are held as legal title and banks will normally accept them as surety.

Maybe not exactly what you're looking for but there's a restaurant near my place that always used to have literally hundreds of imported beers - Belgian and otherwise. I haven't been recently so can't comment on their current offer but I note the mention 'Craft Beers' on their Facebook page.  I note you're in Isaan and mention visiting Bangkok so you will almost go past the place on that route. Well worth a visit.

E.A.T. Khao Yai - small restaurant but excellent food.

Its on the 2090 - Thanarat Road and although it says Khao Yai, its actually closer to Pak Chong and literally 5 minutes from Highway 2 (Mitraphap) - about 500m after Makro.

2 hours ago, OGHalo said:

I'm here to ask a simple question to see if anyone here has the answer to my question but instead all I gotten was people criticizing

Par for the course here I'm afraid.  Some people just feel the need to post - even if they can't help. You have my sympathy.

I would suggest you may some information from the people who advertise that they wish to buy Hilux's for export on a website that includes the words Baht and Sold. They are clearly exporting regularly.

On 1/16/2024 at 2:35 AM, webfact said:

Fans of the Cullen channel suggested that the pair are likely holding the correct visas, and certainly not tourist visas, as they both have Thai bank accounts and Thai driving licenses. Cullen previously owned a club in Khaosan while P’ Jung is a businessman.

'likely holding the correct visa and certainly not tourist visas' - seems to suggest that they have business visas. Plenty of people have Thai bank accounts and driving licences but don't have a business visa. I some cases those people certainly DO have tourist visas.

On 1/14/2024 at 2:20 AM, BritManToo said:

If you think sex is a pain in the bum, you're probably doing it wrong!

 

Rent at 30kbht/month seems massively out of line for a single guy.

My 3 bedroom house costs 10kbht/month.

 

As for income, massive boasters on this forum, the reality is most have nothing but their state pension.

When the Brit DWP pays out a week late, look at all the complaint posts on these forums ..........

Most people seem to be living hand to mouth, pension doesn't arrive on time and they don't eat.

(Brit pension is 800GBP/4 weeks, that's about $1,000US/month)

I don't know what someone's income has to do with my post.  However, I agree that there are a lot of boasters on AN.  Generally, I find that people who have money, don't talk about it.

On 1/15/2024 at 4:42 AM, Jimjim1 said:

I have no intention of quoting you or denying you as you obviously know your stuff, however I was merely quoting from the engineers report as shown to me by my friend and as presented to his insurance company who I believe claimed from the garage’s insurance company for negligent work practice and the cost of a replacement vehicle, his being written off.

The report clearly stated that the calipers had not been torqued, his words right or wrong not mine.

One can only assume therefore that the use of the word Torque is very much a mute point in this matter.

 

In that particular case I would suggest that the bolts had simply been put in place and not tightened at all.  That also suggests that the repairer had not road tested the vehicle.  Personally, I would never return a vehicle to a customer, having had work done on the brakes, without road testing first.

On 1/11/2024 at 12:11 AM, steve187 said:

come on, how often do brake calipers fall off, and if they fell off there would be no screeching noise

I think we are wasting our time Steve, I believe you 'know your onions' when it comes to cars - as do I.  I try my best to stick away from threads like this where all the armchair mechanics come out.

21 hours ago, London Lowf said:

So, the "experts" seem to agree - screeching brakes on a public Thai bus while descending a steep hill is absolutely nothing to worry about!

Well its not nothing to worry about but its not a sign of worn out brake shoes.

22 hours ago, Jimjim1 said:

He did not say it had fallen off, he said falling off two entirely different things, and he is correct in that the screeching is a precursor to the eventual total destruction of the front or back of the vehicle before it smashes into whatever gets in it’s uncontrolled brakeless way.

Also they can come off as a friend found out to the cost of the garage who fitted brand new calipers but did not torque the bolts, luckily for my friend it happened at low speed as he traversed a roundabout.

You don't really need to torque caliper bolts, officially they should be changed each time they are taken out.  New bolts are usually pre-coated with dry thread lock and often come in a brake pad replacement kit. If the bolts are re-used or are not coated, liquid thread lock should be applied and allowed to dry before using the car.

In 25 years in the motor trade, I never torqued caliper bolts - ever and I don't know anyone else who does.  Caliper bolts have a flat mating flange, when coated with thread lock, they simply need firmly tightening.

And before you quote me the torque figures, I'm talking real world - there are torque figures for just about every bolt on a car most are a waste of time unless you are a novice but nobody torques caliper bolts.  Caliper retaining frame bolts - yes, but again, most mechanics will simply use the well known figure of FT and use a strong bar.  They never come loose when set to FT and you'd have to use a strong bar over a metre long to snap one.

5 hours ago, brianthainess said:

I doubt busses have brake pads, more likely brake shoes worn down and drums full of dust.

Full of dust is one reason yes.  Overheating is another.

Screeching shoes, throroughly clean shoes, drums and backplates then file down the corner of the leading edges.  Discs - make sure the sliders are working correctly - no excessive corrosion build up on the pad retainers (friction points) - then apply a little Copper Grease on the back of the pads where they meet the caliper pistons and a tiny amount on the pad plate friction points.

On 1/10/2024 at 7:50 PM, London Lowf said:

When I say screech I am not exaggerating - brakes only make that noise when the pads and warning strips are completely shot or thed caliper is falling off.

Nah they don't - worn pads grind and graunch.  Screeching is nowt to do with wear - you can put a new set of pads or shoes in and they can screech from the off.

When have to ever known a caliper fall off?  That would be a new one on me and I've taken a few thousand apart.

Most brake wear indicators don't work, the wiring usually fails well before the pads are low enough to earth the circuit.

On 1/10/2024 at 2:25 PM, London Lowf said:

Don't the drivers/owners in Thailand understand that this is a warning sign?

I'm not going to spend ages explaining what causes it but screetching brakes are not actually a sign of a fault or even worn brakes. (ex mechanic)

However, your general sentiment - that they don't look after vehicles properly - especiallly commercial vehicles is bang on.

9 hours ago, flyingtlger said:

Key word, "proposed". Not going to happen...

Does anything? Ever?

10 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Good grief - don't you realise the same people are still in charge?! 

Well said that man!  Glad to see at least one other member knows the score.  Coup? Elected Government?  Whoever appears to be 'in charge' its just an illusion. Not sure if its 5 or 6 families that actually run Thailand - and have done for many years.

10 hours ago, JimboB4 said:

The Thai government will be concerned about the economy and bringing in the tourists and this is what’s bringing them back. 

What weed?

I doubt it. It was widely smoked before they 'legalised' it - just maybe not so openly.

I am yet to meet anyone who decided to visit Thailand because weed was legalised, maybe because it wasn't, or was it? Damned if I know - there's been nothing but confusion from the start.

One of the biggest farms in the country (as far as I know) is still the same size now as it was 9 years ago when I first visited it.  The point being, that weed has been produced, large scale for many years. As fas as I can see, all that's changed is its on view now - and by the looks of things its going underground again.

14 hours ago, Negita43 said:

where mask wearing is part of the culture of caring for other's welfare.

Yes - remember that next time you're eating Thai style and someone sticks their spoon into to your Tom Yum - the same spoon that's just been in their mouth.  Mask wearing they'll do but try asking them to stop sharing food or to at least use a serving spoon - not a hope.

1 hour ago, AustinRacing said:

Good news. It was meant for medical use only.

Well it wasn't, then it was and then god knows what? They were never really clear on that - neither when it was announced nor for the first few months.  Remember all the talk about Cannabis Tourism, how it would revitalise the tourist industry? 

Did they ever formalise the law on exactly what was and wasn't allowed?  Last I heard, the answer was no. All I ever heard was conflicting statements from different 'ministers' (sometimes from the same minister) and just because someone says something, that doesn't make it law.

I guess the law may have been made clear but I doubt it. In any case I got bored with all the conflicts and stopped following it.