NowNow

He didn't download them himself. Someone else downloaded them and sent them via WhatsApp. He asked for 14 to 16 years old and what he got was what he got.

Pervert.

How could he verify the ages within the media supplied to him? He asked for 14 to 16 it seems.

No. It's your ridiculous behaviour that tickled me. What he did has been documented and he has been punished for it. It's your behaviour that seems nuts 😊

Maybe one day when you say the wrong thing or mention the wrong person and about to be prosecuted, we'll all just stand back and repeat, but you broke the law and condemn you without further ado. 😊

Read it when you posted it in the first place. He received a light sentence because that is what was RECOMMENDED.

Either way, he's been sentenced and you cannot get over it 😊 Doesn't bother me. You can continue shaking yours fists at the clouds.

I say better satisfied by depiction than actually molesting children. 14 to 16 are sexually active anyway. It's your sick mind suggesting that I'm in favour. Have you ever used the services of a prostitute? I'm not in favour of prostitution, but better that the desperate and thirsty have an outlet.

But we aren't discussing paedophilia. That's the point. A few tried to paint it as such, but the evidence shows that he asked for 14-16 year olds. The fact that the ages varied comes down to the sender and the inability to verify ages. Possibly the teenager that supplied the material pulled them off the dark web. So Huw is/was an idiot, but there is no evidence that he'd done anything like that before. So all of the baying for his blood seems a bit overblown.

A lot ado about nothing. Just a few drama queens getting themselves all wound up in other people's lives. Did he molest anyone's children? No. This is all about his THOUGHTS and FEELINGS. Then you get all these weirdoes introducing their own disgusting thoughts and ugly anger into the mix. He gets sexual kicks from watching teenage boys at it. That's embarrassing enough that everyone knows. But those sick minds want blood.....because they have sick minds. I say better he looked at depictions and satisfied himself, than corrupting a young person. He's not a paedophile neither did he touch any young person. I don't don't care about his salary. What on earth does that have to do with anything? That just smacks of ugly envy. Not defending him, just simply discussing the case as presented. It could be anyone. We all do things that can be claimed lead to something else.

What is a 'nonce', name caller?

Asked and answered. Thank you 😊 Time to be moving on. Check your moral compass to see if it's still working.

He did delete them AFAIK.

Anyway, time to move on. I've made my point of exposing the histrionics and hyperbole on this thread. I'm not hoping to change their minds 😊 🕊️

I haven't imagined anything. I ASKED.... Have you EVER used the services of a prostitute?

He didn't ask for those images to be sent. He asked for 14 to 16 years. Do you know differently?

Nope, I gave you my opinion. It's been you who has been resorting to insults. Go back and take a look.

Do you think repeating the same thing over and over again will provoke me into an emotional response? 😊 That's your domain, petal.

You acknowledge but cannot accept the fact and reality of it. How ironic. 😊

But no one cares about your wild and extreme opinion, other than other extremists.

I have no idea as to what you imagine that you have 'called out'. We know about the report and we know that he received a suspended sentence as it wasn't that serious. Agreeing with my POV.

I've dealt with the 'fact and reality' that he was given a suspended sentence. It seems that it is you who is unable to accept that fact and reality.

Beginning to believe that you and @JonnyF are one and the same 😊 You aren't 'winning' any argument, you are just demonstrating the limits of your intelligence.

Show me any denial. Just like @JonnyF Throwing stuff out there in the hope that it sticks.

I'm glad you made that argument....so let us extrapolate on that 😊 As you know, in the age of AI, we can make lifelike media that is simply not real. What would be your position if all of the images found were exactly the same, but AI generated? I'm glad that I made you smile. It's a discussion. You just got carried away.