NowNow

Yes and so what? He was convicted and sentenced. The matter is concluded, apart from the histrionics of a few.

So make that argument, as opposed to your rather pathetic name calling antics. I actually had you down as an intelligent person prior to this discussion. Now I can see that you are just the mirror image of @JonnyF 😊

Once again, we have EVIDENCE that he asked for material wherein the participants were between 14 to 16. He had no control over the actual ages. Do you disagree with the definition of a 'nonce' or is it that your 'emotions' are getting in the way of your intelligence?

There are many ends of society with whom I do not associate. That doesn't make me feel the need to discriminate against them. Have you EVER used the services of a prostitute? If so, is it okay if I call you a lowlife loser? We can all judge. Just some of us are able to judge more fairly than others. You know....without a left/right obsession or a moral panic.

Nice to see that you eventually changed your spelling of nonse to nonce. 😊 You should perhaps have left it at the nonsense it was. A 'nonce' ,in your prison parlance, is a rapist or child molester. Do you have any evidence or accusations to make in that regard or is this just more evidence of your histrionics? Introducing arguments that obfuscate the main issue? Sexually active 14 to 16 year olds IS the main issue. Some who chooses to watch videos of them might be a bit strange to you or me, but is hardly a hardened criminal. A light sentence was appropriate, if not an outright dismissal. Pre-teens would be and should be treated differently.

Aaahh...I can see that you are using a VPN that doesn't offer Smart DNS as part of their service.

If you will insist on using 'big words', perhaps you should 'brush up' on their actual meanings. Obfuscation: The action of making something obscure, unclear, or unintelligible. Demonstrate that in the post that you quoted.

That's poor, even for you 😊 14 to 16 year olds are already having sex. What evidence do you have of child abuse? I'm not saying there isn't child abuse, but already we are a far cry from the malicious accusations with regard to 7 to 9 year olds. The difference is that I didn't jump onto the hysterical bandwagon nor exhibit any bias. Unlike @JonnyF with his obsession with right and left and yourself, just histrionics with little desire for actual facts.

Perhaps you should answer it in the way that you want it answered. You obviously don't like MY reply. So conjure up your own. 14 to 16 year olds really isn't that big of a deal. Unsavoury? Yes. But hardly the crime of the century watching teenagers. At 14, I was already meeting girls in clubs. 15 and I was living with a woman ten years older. You and @JonnyF have lived sheltered lives 😊

What I see here is mostly hysteria...devoid of facts.

Raped by whom? Have you seen the material?

Of course. 14 to 16 year olds on video. 14 o 16 years olds being sexually active. I didn't read anything about there being adults in the videos. Did you?

Ilk? I don't mix with the undereducated locals at all. Can we say the same for you?

How do you know they were raped on camera? Have you viewed the material? I haven't.

@Chomper Higgot Take a step back. You are so 'frantic' that you've taken it upon yourself to reply on @JonnyF's behalf. But you weren't quite so virtuous when clicking on the laughing emoticon when he made his Jimmy Saville joke. Obviously that didn't register as a "personal attack and slurring innuendo" to you. So how about you grow and accept that people can have a different opinion?

Is @JonnyF a teenager in Thailand? Who mentioned teenagers in Thailand other than yourself? You are so overly excited, that you cannot even take the time to comprehend what you read. Take a breath, you are behaving hysterically.

Yes and he was sentenced for it. It's only the curtain twitchers crying about it and baying for his blood. It's patently ridiculous.

A late starter were you @JonnyF? Explains why you ended up in Thailand... Most 14 to 16 year olds are sexually active.

Don't be silly now. There is absolutely no obfuscation on my part. Demonstrate thus or hold your tongue. It's my opinion, that simply differs from yours. You are going to have to accept that, just as I accept that you are being overly dramatic to the point of hysteria.

Yes, I say 'meh' to 14 to 16 year olds. Most kids are having sex by that age.

So now you find a different source 😊 But weren't you banging on about 7 to 9 year olds earlier? Only to find that he actually requested 14 to 16 year olds. He wasn't in control of the exact ages actually sent to him. Stop constantly moving the goalposts @JonnyF 😊

Yes, you are behaving hysterically. I'm simple outlining the facts as we know them. Whereas you have become 'emotionally' involved. If the images were of 7 to 9 year olds and he specifically asked for them, I wouldn't be posting here. 14 to 16...meh.

Nope. Police and judge agree with my point of view. That he isn't a risk to society. What next? Thought crimes?

I didn't increase their ages @JonnyF, I quoted YOUR source Your own source claims that he asked for material of people between 14 and 16 years old. So if there was any variation from those ages, that would be down to the sender, wouldn't it? Unlike yourself, I have no dog in the fight. I just look at the evidence. Seems the police and judge agree with me.

Might I suggest that you are being a bit of a drama queen? So bent out of shape because he is well paid and in the public eye. IMO it's much ado about nothing. Scale of perversion? Are you completely mad? 14 to 16 year old boys/14 to 16 year old girls are sexually attractive to very many humans. But responsible adults would not carry out such acts. But watching videos privately....relatively harmless. Get off your high horse, lest you hurt yourself.