BLMFem

Thank you. I'm acquiring quite a following among the MAGA crowd here on AN, although that's mainly for salacious reasons. I did consider changing my avatar to something that doesn't trigger so many repressed posters' urges, but now I'm seriously considering getting an OnlyFans account!

I guess you missed the fact that Biden was dumped by his own in favor of Harris. Would have been real refreshing if the GOP had done the same.

As you say it's rare, just many "BLM trannies" do you know? I'm utterly surprised you know even one!

It's 4D chess!

I'm doing fine, but I do want to thank you as it's clear you're speaking from personal experience. Well done, mate.

Calling Trump an elephant is a bit harsh, isn't it?

Yes, we can see that you didn't bother and that's why you needed to start deflecting.

Oh dear, I think you've just made a big poo-poo. The only poster I pointed out was deflecting in this thread was the poster EVENKEEL. So you're posting under two handles, then. Why do you even need to do that KhunLA/EVENKEEL?

That's nothing to be ashamed of, honey. You do you, and that's no one else's business.

Yes, and you know she's running on fumes when the best she could come up with is "Trump hater". Like that's actually something negative.😄 PS. I like your avatar. I need to change mine into something like that as the resident MAGA manlymen keep getting turned on by it.

I could say your guess is as good as mine but that wouldn't really be telling the truth.

Who is this Bob you're speaking of? I've been called "Bob" by a couple of posters so I assume you're searching for his reincarnation. Why is that - do you miss him?

I was asking a question, not floating boats. But your deflection is noted.

Your claimed "Trump is not raising tariffs, he is negotiating trade deals with the threat of raising tariffs." My reply proved you wrong. You reply to that was to question Rand Paul's motives for being against tariffs. That's as clear an example of a deflection as you can possibly get. End of story.

Great post clearly illustrating some of the consequences of the new tariffs, as well as the DOGE lay-offs.

What about BAAAA?

Thanks for the summary. Saved me wasting time watching the vid.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how you deflect. Bravo!

So MAGA is a fallacy then?

And?

"Lack of manufacturing is why the USA is in the state it is" Grossly simplistic as well as completely wrong.

So what's this then? Another round of auto tariffs just went into effect. They could change the industry forever "The average car buyer doesn’t think about where the parts in their vehicle come from – but automakers do. That’s why a new round of auto tariffs – this time on parts – coming into effect Saturday could upend the industry, even more than previous levies on imported cars. As of 12:01 am ET on Saturday, most auto part imports will come with a 25% import tax."

So as they "decline economically" they, of course, will import less and less from the US, and this is great news for Trump? Would you care to elaborate on that, Jonny, because it seems rather counter-intuitive? Thanks in advance, pal!

Simple1 got you good and you deflect by posting a Wiki link about the origin of tariffs dating back to a time when the Dem and Rep parties weren't even formed? Sorry, but I gotta use your favorite emoji;

Great post, Mr. Lewie London!😄