Stiddle Mump

I think sidelining the threat-deception (No. 1 above) as if it doesn’t matter, serves to maintain the false justification for the biodefense response deception and the false scientific premises for the vaccine deception. ( … ) In my view, the public health system, including the entire communicable disease control and vaccination system, is a component of the US military: more formally authorized as such since the Congressional enactment of the Public Health Service Act of 1944, and deployed nationwide as such since the 1955 polio campaign. The polio campaign was the military-public health seed from which grew the monstrous childhood immunization and adult poisoning schedules now recommended by the HHS-CDC. ( … ) Full article : https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/false-binaries ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… The most important aspect of the whole 'virus' and 'pandemic' saga is;;; 'is it true?' Imagine the chaos that would result from the sudden knowledge that 'pathogenic viruses don't exist'. Not only would it bankrupt many of the Big Pharma medicine, and vaccine, producing companies, but it would throw into question one of the most fundamental of our medical beliefs; that we have an immune system. The whole Medical Complex is built on the belief that pathogen viruses exist. And not only exist, but are hiding round every lamp post ready to pounce on us defenseless humans. The whole medical establishment would have to undergo an upheaval. Books, that the budding doctors read as gospel, would suddenly become irrelevant. The whole of the learning process, that medical professionals undergo, would have to change. The billions of people that rolled up their sleeve to get a 'safe and effective' jab would be outraged. Is it any wonder that those that promote a natural approach to health don't get much of a voice? It is any wonder that professionals that question the 'settled' narrative often lose their livelihoods and are relentlessly ridiculed. After all, what's more important: fat bank balances for the few, or good human health for the billions? Dr Daniel Roytas researched, the often hidden experiments, on pathogenic viruses. His work took him into dusty old libraries that held the truth treasures. He put them together and reported back. Read all about it in; http://www.CanYouCatchaCold.com Or get the book; Can you Catch a Cold.

I don't agree. There are less than 10 diseases.

The symptoms, you refer to, are the body trying to rid itself of the toxic junk that has just been injected into it. Nothing to do with an 'immune' system at all.

""Please don’t make the mistaken assumption that I would ever include you in any ‘we’ I refer to. When I say ‘we,’ I do not mean those who spout the kind of outlandish and baseless claims you have put forward. Even your fellow anti-vaxxers draw the line at denying the existence of viruses, disputing their isolation, or dismissing pathogenic viruses altogether - and suggesting antibiotics are unnecessary because ‘nature has the answers’ is simply beyond reason. You inhabit a world of your own making. So no, you are emphatically not part of the ‘we’ - quite the opposite, in fact and its the reason I barely give your comments much attention.... just not worthy.""" ======== You are tangled up in a make-believe virologist's world Richard. You are easily fooled Sir. But, if it's any consolation; you are not the only one. There is no isolation of ANY virus. Never has been. What the white-coats call a virus is simply fictitious data in a computer. In the real world, as apposed to a virologist's world, there are no such entities as pathogenic anything. And when I say 'pathogenic' I'm talking what is found naturally in nature, not some poison that the white-coats concoct and inject into animal's brains. Have a butchers at Dr Roytas findings. He researched all the pathogenic virus experiments and put them in his book. Is he wrong?

WE don't know that at all Richard. Just cherry-picking from some anti-science garbage as usual. As for the balance of evidence you speak of. That's just utter nonsense. Covid-19 didn't pose a threat to anyone. All a big fraud.

Pretty good summary that. Goes right to the top. Why was RFK taken out? IMO; executive order11110. Why the finger pointing toward the Ruskies and China? Because they will not bend the knee. Iran also. John Lennon Bill Cooper Brandy Vaughn Robin Cook Etc.

It's an AI take over for sure/

Must ask; what is the point of a virus? The whole jab authority is based on anti-science and fraud. Times have to change. Too late for us. And most of our children. But for the kids yet to be born. It's all very well talking about not jabbin babes, but the damage for many is already set before birth. It will take a generation to sort out the mess.

Dr Vernon Coleman says it is a giant hoax. He knows what he is talking about.

Sounds like the doctors all over.

That could be true. However there are s few rivals for 'most powerful'. Big Pharma Military Complex Big Oil Chemical Industry Big food Israel lobby Bankers Big Tech My money is on the Bankers. Followed by the Israel Lobby.

Dr Roytas put the findings into a book; 'Can You Catch a Cold?'. The experiments are there for all to see. His data has been analysed and as yet stands strong. It cannot be refuted.

Let's see some genuine scientific experiments that isolate and purify a virus. (Any virus) Let's have independent observers. Control experiments to run along side. Then!!! If the virus can be isolated, let's see if it can infect an animal or human in a natural way. (rather than injecting into a brain) There are other 'Gold Standard steps to follow. Now! Let's go back to the 1950s. Who said they did these experiments? Dr Enders. (nobel prize winner) He also had a control running alongside. In the result precis, he reported that the control yielded the same result as the one with the 'virus'. Of course having the two petri dishes giving the same result would not be of financial benefit. So not generally reported on. And since then, controls are carried not out by the so-called virologists. Why is that? Because it is the procedure that causes the result.

The Doctor has spent years researching the medical papers for 150 yeas. Can he not be given credit for that in your eyes. His book 'Can You Catch a Cold' report on those experiments. Well worth a read Richard. Interesting findings. As for qualifications; give me an honest researcher any day over a fraudulent doctor.

If I insisted that it was hundreds of alligators barking and hundreds of elephants in the sky crying that caused rain and thunder, you might well ask (quite rightly) how I know that to be true. If I can't supply the evidence (which I'm unlikely to be able to do) then my hypothesis is debunked. By the same token; when a virologist makes a claim (that a virus has been isolated for instance) one would expect to see some evidence. There is NONE. Plenty of antiscientific nonsense and fraud though. If I could see some proof, then I would rethink my position; that is;;;; pathogenic viruses do not exist. Bit like someone saying that a god made everything, and you say you do not agree. You wouldn't reasonably be expected to prove a god didn't. You might say; how do you know? Then that person, making the claim, points to a bible and says; that's all the proof you need. But you are not convinced. Much of what we think we know just aint so.

A virus - could exist as it is simply cell-debris - and is indistinguishable from other fragments. It's probably useful in helping the body cleanse itself. BUT!! What I'm saying, is that a virus has NEVER been isolated and found to cause any ill effects on animals or humans. Viruses are not a pathogenic entity. Dr Daniel Roytas wrote a book about it; 'Can You Catch a Cold'. He went through all the studies and experiments of the last 150 years and reported. Nature has the answers we seek.

You give the impression Richard that you know so much. In fact you are simply a parrot for the MSM. I was publicly debating vaccines, and the poisons that they had within them, back in the 1990s. Before I'd ever heard of Dr Kaufman. However! What I like about Dr Kaufman's lectures, podcasts etc,, is his stickler for the truth. If it's not true; then it can't be build upon. Show us the truth. Show us the evidence. Difficult for virologists that; cause there aint any.

They are wrong. Why are you quoting such biased and compromised entities? If it's OK with the OP, I'll tell you precisely what causes illness.

Why is that Sir. Because you do not agree. There are only a few things that make us ill. Less that 10 for sure. And if you think viruses, then I suggest you look up 'www.canyoucatchacold.com and go to Dr Andrew Kaufman's vid on what C-19 was. As David Parker said; "What you thought you knew about disease is wrong." And he should know. He spent 10 years researching that. The truth is out there for all to see. If one has the will and the eyes. Nature has the answers we seek.

What was COVID-19 then Fred bud? If you caught it, and became infected you were said to have a disease. A lot of words surrounding medicine and medical science are a bit vague. Some are changed to suit an agenda. To name a few; 'vaccine'. 'isolation', 'pandemic', 'epidemic'.

I think you are misinformed Richard mate. For me; there is only one question. Is it true? Must of what you post, and indeed, most medical thinking is unscientifically untrue. Go back through history and one can see thousands of 'facts', 'evidence' and 'truths' presented by the the medical industry that are simply nonsense. Vaccines are right up there. Nature has the answers we seek.

Ah yes 'cancer'. But can it be termed a disease? To me a disease is something you catch and can pass on. The word has been attached to any number of complaints, sicknesses, illnesses and even hereditary stuff. There are a few reasons why we get cancer. Although we can't 'catch' it.

People don't die from diseases Fred bud. What is a disease even? Our bodies are adapted to do the right thing at all times. Easy for the uninformed to simply quote MSM and blame microbes, germs, bacteria and parasites. We have them all in abundance; but they are there to help us not to hurt us.

They are not 'side effects' Fred. They are direct effects. It's all nonsense Fred bud. The body will look after itself.

Fake data. Unscientifiv nonsense. Unrigorous, unproven unscientific thinking. You seem to be incapable of seeing the truth Richard mate.