Jump to content

James65

Member
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by James65

  1. The TM7 form does. Most of us with a DTV will never use that form because we won't bother extending.
  2. That would help, but of course the stamps don't say "temporary stay".......
  3. Then they should define somewhere what a "temporary stay permit" means. There is no way anyone could possibly guess that without some explanation.
  4. You don't have to translate, the sites are available in both Thai and English. But they are using some automatic translation that is terrible and often makes no sense. It's not translated by a human.
  5. I really don't think it's possible for any non-thai speaker to use either of those websites for find this requirement. The translations are too bad. For example one says: " According to The Immigration Act,B.E.2522,the foreigner who has received a temporary stay permit and stayed in the Kingdom of Thailand over 90 days must notify his/her residence to immigration officer every 90 days." What's a "temporary stay permit"? It doesn't exist, so everyone reading this will think the 90 day report doesn't apply to them.
  6. Is there any official website where a foreigner could find this information? It seems like the only way to do "research" on Thai laws is to ask questions on forums like this or to read through hundreds of unofficial websites that have conflicting information.
  7. I'm on DTV, staying 180 days or less per entry, so I will never have to do an extension. I'm just not bothering doing 90 day reports. It's technically required if in the country longer than 90 days, but if you never do an extension and don't need anything from immigration, there is no enforcement. The IOs at the airport never mention it.
  8. So this was a win for Biden. It was announced before the election. Thanks Biden.
  9. Sure, you can get that price if using miles, but do you know of any airline where you can change the name on an award ticket? Usually airlines are quite strict about name changes on award tickets to prevent people from selling the ticket like this.
  10. I guess terrorism is an American's problem then. I hope the US doesn't ever need NATO allies again, like they did after 9-11. I doubt Canada or Europe will come to America's defense anyone like they did back then.
  11. GW Bush was quite liberal then. Quite a world we live in when you think Bush is a liberal and NATO hating Russia lovers are conservatives.
  12. This may actually be the single most ridiculous thing ever written on the internet.
  13. What exactly is traditional about Trump? He is the most radical president in American History. Trump has the complete opposite policies of GW Bush who was president in 2001. Bush was pro immigrant, pro free trade, anti Russia. Bush worked with our allies and even asked NATO to defend the Untied States after the attacks.
  14. The best way is to self insure, save and invest the money you would have wasted on premiums......
  15. I'm sure hundreds of "healthy" one year old girls died somewhere in the world today, and most hadn't been just vaccinated. The world is a big place and people die all the time. So you found one girl that died who was just vaccinated....very sad but meaningless. Millions of people were vaccinated today with no problems.....
  16. The name of an undercover CIA operative was mentioned in the text of the chat. Thats what I'm talking about. Goldberg Redacted it at request of the CIA. The CIA obviously knows that name is classified, not just Pete and Trump. So Pete clearly lied when he testified to congress that there was no classified information in the chat. That lie alone is grounds for firing and prosecution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_group_chat_leak
  17. Before Goldberg published the chat, Pete and Trump repeatedly said there was nothing classified or sensitive in any of the communications on Signal. Are you saying they were lying? Goldberg didn't publish the name of the source btw. Goldberg withheld the source because the CIA asked him to--even though Trump said it wasn't a secret.
  18. It's no different than a religion. They worship him like God. It would be like a Christian criticizing Jesus.
  19. Sure, if somebody in sleepy joe's adim used signal they should have been fired too. I thought Trump was going to change things and hire competent people? What happened?
  20. Of course they should have. Same as Pete. Anyone who breaks basic codes of conduct should be fired regardless of party.
  21. When anyone in the government started using signal is irrelevant. Anyone who used it to send sensitive information should be fired and then prosecuted.
  22. That wouldn't be surprising. Any third party app would be super easy for anyone to hack with just one rouge employee, and why it should never be used for sensitive information. Surely the Russians and Chinese already read everything there. That's a question for your dear leader.
  23. He should be fired just for using Signal for sending sensitive information. Whether or not the journalist was added is irrelevant to his misconduct.
  24. And the stock market is way down and overall inflation expectations are the worst since 1993. So Americans can afford to buy a few eggs, but nothing else. Great job so far MAGAs. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/stock-market
×
×
  • Create New...