Geoff914

Thank God we no longer get that Australian 5h1te or their sex perverts.

Jo Brand on the BBC calling for battery acid to be thrown on Nigel Farage. No action.

There was case just a few years ago when a Western company used a Chinese model who had very narrow eyes. All the Chinese were in uproar. Funny how Chinese traditional art always show very narrow eyes.

Of course.

Which Asian country calls Westerners big noses?

Do you seriously think that in two years things might have started to look better? There is still the problem that they are a bunch of incompetent morons. I before you accuse me of being far right I voted for these cretins.

What has that got to do with the BBC falsely reporting the news? If what the BBC did was actually part of a satirical comedy programme then that would have been a different matter. We would have known it was satire. But this a news programme for God's sake.

The BBC backing Huw Edwards is what finished it for me supporting the BBC. The disgusting employment of sex perverts and others has gone on far too long. Also the backing of this 5h1te Martin Bashir. If the BBC gets its Charter re-newed then it will be the biggest display of corruption in the UK ever.

Impartial my ar5se. I am not a Reform supporter. I am an idiot who voted Labour last year. The BBC are a disgrace. Arrogant, employers of sex perverts and criminals, the programmes are rubbish I barely watch any BBC any more, employ BBC Gods at huge salaries, have utter contempt for licence fee payer, harass, bully and threaten people who do not watch live tv and therefore do not need to by a tv licence. 38 degrees the campaigning organisation sent an email asking me to sign the petition in support of the BBC against Trump, I refused to sign. What the BBC did as wrong and a disgrace and who is going to pay the damages Trump will win? Well not the BBC, the poor bl00dy licence fee payer of course. And about time the some people who see any sort of campaign that they don't support as a misguided far right thing need to get a life.

How did the de-colonisation of French Indochina go then?

What a BS answer. The UK is not firing missiles at anybody. The UK, just the same as other NATO countries, are supplying arms to a friendly nation that was invaded by Russia. What is there for Russia to retaliate against.

Ssssshhhhhhhh you will give the game away.

"This comes as the UK pushes for all new cars to be electric or hybrid by 2030 to meet its "net zero" target by 2050." Baring in mind the next election wont be until 2029 it will be to late in the day to continue with ICE cars.

You could also add Nato/Russian borders with Norway, Poland (Kalingrad), Turkey (before dissolution of the Soviet Union), sea border with the USA (Alaska). In addition Finland subsequently. So why the hell is Russian banging on a about a new Nato country bordering Russia. A pretty feeble excuse.

What I find strange is that the country responsible for this mess is France and France, would appear at least, to be taking no interest. May be they are and I just don't know about it.

Just looked at the satellite view and it looks like the border follows the ridge line so I can't see that the Cambodians have anything to gripe about with the Trat border. The border at Preah Vihear also follows the ridge line except where the temple is and there is a very obvious error in where the border is.

Apart from the obvious access to off shore resources why does Cambodia have gripe with the Trat border. The slither of Thailand extending to the East does look a bit odd. But then if this is another water shed issue the so be it. The Cambodians can't have it both ways. If the border is in an odd position giving the advantage to Thailand then I would shut up about the temple. The Off shore resources must be worth more than an old temple miles from anywhere with limited tourist potential. Just hang on to that bit of Gulf of Thailand coast.

How on Earth does that work? To continually feed out the cable I assume it is fed from the launch site so the cable must be airborne. Or does the drone have a 50 km cable drum attached. I assume this is a substantial drone. May be I am over imagining the size of a 50km fibre optic cable drum.

Glaswegian. That would confuse the most ardent decryptor. They are speaking some indecipherable language. Sorry Glaswegians it is a joke. You can have a free pop at us Southerners.

Britain and France as colonial powers go all the stick when they were in control. So this hasn't been a problem for France or Britain for more than 65 odd years. The French were kicked out of Viet Nam, Laos and Cambodia in the 50s. Burma got independence in 1948 and Malaysia in the 1957. Now having said that then the ex colonial power must take responsibility after walking away but in the case of Malaysia. The UK is no longer a dominant country in the World so why is a British problem when both the two warring were not ex British colonies. The top World economies in order are US, China, Germany, Japan, India, UK, France. So five countries ahead of the UK in the pecking order. When Britain does get involved it gets stick and when it doesn't it gets stick. Damned if we do and damned if we don't.

If your travel plans are now part of a war zone can you cancel under your insurance as the UK Foreign Office has advised not to go there? So if your 2 weeks were on Ko Chang which you now can't go to is that a valid claim for cancellation on the insurance policy.

It isn't a question of how much money China is giving Cambodia. 60% of Cambodia's GDP is from illegal scam operations. Anything China is giving is a fraction of the remaining 40%. Excluding of course any scammed Chinese.

He hasn't made peace with the penguins yet.

That was a joke, right?

Who polices that?