Alan Zweibel

A common saying is that a prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. If it takes a push from the President to get an indictment after a previous prosecutor couldn't come up with anything, that doesn't bode well for the strength of the case.

And the same can be said of the right, can it not? The difference is that before Trump, the charge wasn't being led by a President.

Really? 100K? Repeatedly lying in the face of overwhelming? Your comment is ridiculous.

Thanks for the evidence-free rebuttal.

Well, Cameroni thinks that you're the fan of an idiot.

It's clear you don't understand that not all falsehoods are lies.

I occasionally check in on Greenwald. I think it's significant that despite the fact that there's plenty of good software that can transliterate the spoken word into text, he doesn't offer it. I suspect he doesn't care because most of his audience is semi-literate. Basically he throws softball questions at people he agrees with. Like Carlson.

You called Alex Jones an idiot. There are people in this thread who respect the claims that someone you call an idiot has made. And those comments weren't just dumb. They were vicious.

Because you and your fellow are psychic about digital recordings of performers?

Well, please share with us your source that Jimmy Kimmel not only got it wrong, but was lying. As for Jones being an idiot, do you realize that you're insulting several members in this thread who take Jones seriously?

I guess that means you're a frequent viewer.

Learn to read urls. The source was the Texas Tribune. It's funny. Right wingers go after Jimmy Kimmel by claiming that his falsehoods are stirring up dissension and violence. But when Alex Jones makes inflammatory claims, that's okay because he didn't specifically ask his listeners to threaten the parents.

Small beer, huh? Did Jimmy Kimmel insult the wife of Charlie Kirk? Did he say that the assassination was a fake? Did he question the reality of her grief? Alex Jones called the murder of 20 schoolchildren a hoax. He called the parents actors. As bad as the assassination of Charlie Kirk was, non-deranged people believe that the murder of a child is even worse. This was 20 children. It's clear what sort of people you should be numbered among.

Anybody who called the mass murder of schoolchildren a hoax is not someone who should be taken seriously. Only a fanatic would give any credence to what he says.

This is small beer? "The families testified during the trial that the lies spread by Jones led to harassment and threats by conspiracy theorists who have accused them of faking their own children’s deaths." https://www.texastribune.org/2022/10/12/alex-jones-sandy-hook-shooting/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Conspiracy dog whistling much?

Thanks for the information-free rebuttal.

Well, if it may be in the news more thanks to RFK, but the science shows it's a dead issue.

Actually, you've got it dead wrong. The standard method of measuring income equality uses something called the Gini coefficient. The higher the number, the greater the income inequality. From an article entitled 10 US States With the Most Income Inequality the Gini coefficient of Mississippi is 0.48 https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/10-us-states-most-income-inequality?utm_source=chatgpt.com For Canada the coefficient is 0.31 https://inclusive-monitor.webflow.io/data-topics/canadas-gini-of-disposable-income-2?utm_source=chatgpt.com In other words, Canadians are far more closely clustered around the average than are Mississippians.

And what does this have to do with the fact that you claim you are a Marxist? By the way, if you care to look it up, he actually did make some statements condemning Jews and Judaism.

A Marxist who supports Trump who regularly denounces opponents for being Marxist. It is to laugh. One of the basic tenets of Marxism is that nationalism is a hoax perpetrated by the ruling classes to keep workers from recognizing their common interests.

Well, to be accurate, I think high fever was specified. Though how much above the baseline that entails, I didn't see any mention.

Alternate spelling: choad

I think that a big reason why Israel is being so brutal in this was is that they are rapidly losing the support of younger Americans. Even young evangelicals. So they want to make life for the Palestinians in Gaza unendurable before that cohort of young Americans becomes too potent electorally.

I thiink on some other thread I expressed my strong distaste for such government intervention. But I don't recall Biden or any other President, Republican or Democrat accusing new sources of engaging in illegal activity. Or an FCC commissioner who threatened a network.