IsmeUno

Pretty and petite local girl with large natural breasts approached me in the street. Just as her friend was about to introduce her to me, I visibly shuddered. They took the hint. Pretty isn't enough. If she's available to any Tom, Dick & Harry, then Tom, Dick & Harry can have her. Not for me thank you. If all it takes to put a smile on your face is to walk with a pretty girl who is only there for the money, you must be one happy dude.

Looks are not the only issue.

Money doesn't buy love. It's just a way some use to bind women to them.

Bitching with whom? You cannot write properly and so you lash out. It's you being 'bitchy'. Predictable.

So instead of addressing your issue with communication, you choose to illustrate a childish and spiteful streak. Perhaps you should learn how to control yourself, rather than to blame others for your lack of control.

You are really in need of AI. Read it three times and still...

That is allegedly, Bangkok Girl.

A much wider colour palette. Not a bad choice, for the money: Panel Type: IPS (In-Plane Switching) with WLED backlight Screen Size: 21.5 inches Resolution: 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) Refresh Rate: 100 Hz Response Time: 4 ms (Extreme Mode), 6 ms (Normal) Brightness: 250 cd/m² Contrast Ratio: 1300:1 Colour Coverage: 99% sRGB Viewing Angle: 178° / 178° Connectivity: 1 x HDMI 1.4, 1 x VGA Adjustment: Tilt (-5° to 22°) VESA Mounting: 100 x 100 mm Dimensions (with stand): 489.3 x 174.0 x 379.4 mm

That clip was hackneyed rubbish.

A 💩 movie

Take it from me, you are.

You are definitely 'special'.

If you like the OP, then why are you ruining his thread?

Not stressed, just wondered why someone would apply it for correcting the record. Oddbods here 😊

A thumbs down for the correct answer @emptypockets ?

Original is Phuket/Sisaket.

That's not much better than the one described in the first post. Relatively low brightness, so only useful indoors and a relatively limited colour gamut. Using sound as an analogy, imagine speakers that cannot produce high and low frequencies. Your 45% NTSC is equal to around 72% sRGB. So marginally better than the one in the first post. One of the cheapest monitors described in my post, Asus ProArt PA248QV(around 7,000 baht) has the following specs: Key Specifications: Display: 24.1-inch IPS panel with LED backlight, 1920 x 1200 resolution (WUXGA), 16:10 aspect ratio. Colour Accuracy: 100% sRGB/Rec. 709 colour gamut, and factory-calibrated colour accuracy Performance: 75Hz refresh rate, 5ms (GTG) response time, 300 cd/m²(nits) brightness, 1000:1 contrast ratio. Connectivity: 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x HDMI (v1.4), 1x VGA, 4x USB 3.0 Type-A ports, Earphone jack, Audio-in. Ergonomics: Height (0~130mm), Tilt (+35° ~ -5°), Swivel (+90° ~ -90°), and Pivot (+90° ~ -90°). Features: ProArt Preset/Palette, Adaptive-Sync, Flicker-Free, Low Blue Light, VESA mount (100x100mm), 2W x 2 Stereo Speakers. Dimensions/Weight: 53.3 x 37.5-50.5 x 21.1 cm (with stand); 6.1 kg. The monitor is designed for colour accuracy in photo/video editing and graphic design, offering a 16:10 aspect ratio which provides more vertical space than standard 16:9 Full HD displays.

There are settings in Windows wherein you can choose what happens when you close the lid. Do Nothing should be your choice. It will be under Power Options. As you state, it's not a suitable display for photo editing: Size: 15.6-inch (IPS) Resolution: Full HD (1920×1080p) Refresh Rate: 60 Hz Brightness: 250 nits (Typical) Aspect Ratio: 16:9 Contrast Ratio: 800:1 Color Gamut: ~60% sRGB I would be looking at a 4k display with higher brightness and a far wider colour gamut. Your current display is simply not capable of producing the colours. Though the best for the job can be a bit pricy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd-ix7p-aho If too much, consider the Asus ProArt PA248QV.. If you want really colourful and also working with video, https://www.jib.co.th/web/product/readProduct/58126/MONITOR--จอมอนิเตอร์--MSI-G274QPF-QD---27-INCH-IPS-2K-170Hz-G-SYNC-COMPATIBLE Maybe you can organise a demo.

IMO, you are a Troll. You write specifically to elicit an extreme response. Rarely have I seen you in normal conversation. You are usually throwing things at someone, figuratively.

It's usually the accuser who is used to winning arguments with themselves, all of a sudden being faced with a different perspective.

I agree. Low fat is just tasteless. I usually buy full fat Greek style yoghurt.

My opinion is that you shouldn't over think these things. Take any criticism with a laugh and the world will laugh with you. React badly and the world will laugh at you. Stuff I learned as a kid.

All of your posts seem to revolve around the same thing. Don't you have other interests?

I would think Hua Hin would get boring 'real quick' if you don't have an other half.

I didn't check four days ago. I checked yesterday at 4pm. It was in stock then, whilst you were still claiming this morning that it was out of stock. Just the facts. No childish name calling and equally childish attempts at point scoring, as you are wont to do. You were telling people in Pattaya that it was out of stock, when it was not.