TaoNow

@richard_smith Lite Beer was referring to the type of agent who arranges a retirement extension for ex-pats who don't have the 800K baht in a Thai bank or want to avoid that requirement. There is no ambiuity about this requirement, and every Immo office has to follow the terms of the extension -- unless they are bent, and accept a bribe from the agent to sign off on the extension, despite lack of proof of financials.

In 2011, my Thai wife died suddenly, and had no will. I went through the process to become "Adminstrator of the Estate" of my deceased wife, and that process was almost exactly as described by hotandsticky in the post above. Just as an aside, what surprised me most was having my name added on to the 2 land deeds -- meaning that I (a foreigner) could sell the land (which I didn't have any intention of doing). However, strangely, the house which sits on the land could only be owned (and sold) by a Thai citizen. Go figure.

For some, this example may be another reason to just park the 800K baht in a fixed deposit account, and no ATM card link.

Just last month, I did a TM30 at Immo/CW. I told the officer I was going to be out of the country for a week at the end of October. She said that, as long as my Bangkok address and visa/extension status did not change, there would be no need to file a new TM30.

@Lorry: clever lad to spot my typo of 'Songram' instead of 'Songran.' Tocuche. As for Rob Browder: The Thai national policy in the 1970s-1980s was to make modern contraception as widely available as possible throughout the country. (Believe me -- I was there.) What the Thai government did not anticipate was that rural Thai families (mostly women-headed) wanted fewer than two children. There was no official pressure, coercion or incentives from the government to have less-than-replacement households. As a result, the Thai population is headed toward negative growth in the decades ahead. What would you do?

For many years now, Thailand has had a declining birth rate. There is (legitimate) concern that, at some point in the near future, Thailand's working-age population will begin to decline. Anyone on this Forum has seen the emerging effects of this at gas pumps, restaurants, domestic-help options, etc. It is too late to try to reverse the modern Thai preference for small families and few children. Thus, in order to meet the near-term labor-force demand and need for eldercare, it makes sense for the Thai government to ease the way for migrants from Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia to help fill these gaps -- due to the migrants proximity, ethnic similarity to Thais, Buddhist religion, and shared indigenous customs (e.g., Songkram, etc.). For those of these cross-border migrants who spend a significant time in Thailand and can assimilate to the local culture and customs, that investment in the Thai economy and culture might be a viable pathway to citizenship. It is a trend that we will increasingly witness around the world as some countries have aging populations while their neighbors are still "young."

In my experience, Immo/CW wants to help you comply with whatever new or old requirements there are. Recently, I posted a thread where Immo/CW asked for a TM30 at the regular 90-day address report -- something they had never done. Instead of fining me or some other nonesense, they simply told me to present my TM30 receipt at the next 90-day address report. I agree, this is a nuisance since we report our address every year (for those on long-stay extensions. But don't get paranoid. They are far more concerned about the immigrants from the neighboring countries than they are with the "Farang" expates who populate this forum.

While it may seem like "good value" baht wise, in my case, there was a half-page red stamp saying I violated the terms of the 90-day address report. That stamp could not be cleared (obviously) until I got a new passport. If they are still doing this, there must be a reason why Immo is flagging ex-pats who violate the 90-day report requirement and pay the fine. Be aware.

TGJ -- I had none of these conditions. Plus, the red stamp on my receipt for the 90-day address report (see the 3rd post) was new -- suggesting that this is a new policy.

Dear Dan: You mis-read the purpose of my post. I was alerting members (and viewers of AN) that your 90-day address report at Immo/CW may now require a receipt for a TM30 report, something which has not been required over the past decade or so. 'nuff said,

Dudes: Think of it this way, the easier you make it for Immo to process you extension, the faster you will get it (other things being equal, like attitude). In the case of money-in-the-bank for retirement extensions, then ask the bank to produce a one-year annual statement (200 baht or less) and save yourself some trouble. At the very least, the one-year statement makes it much easier for the Immo officer to check the account balance to make sure it doesn't fall below 800K baht. In sum, the easier it is for Immo, the easier it is for you. 'Nuff said.

The question that comes to mind now is how often we will need to do a TM30 update (if this is a policy change). Once a year seems OK -- but quarterly would be onerous.

I have attached a phote of the segment of the TM47 receipt with the new stamp

Over the past 16 years, I have done annual extensions (retirement) and 90-day address reports (in person) at Immo/Bkk, and was never asked to produce a TM30 receipt. This morning, I went to do my 90-day address report as usual at Immo/CW, and the officer said that, for the next 90-day report, I need to show evidence of an updated TM30. To make this point clear, she put a red stamp at the lower left corner of my TM47 receipt repeating the instructions to do the TM30 update. I had never seen that stamp before either. Not sure if this was a random check or a new policy...but word to the wise.

Just a few comments. The vlogger featured here used to (still does?) have a page called "Retired Working for You." And, if you watched any of the early posts, this is someone who speaks no or little Thai language, lives as a tourist in Thailand, and seemingly has never gotten the proper visa for his purpose for living or visiting, or working in Thailand on an extended basis. Also, if I was going to visit a senior official of the Ministry of Foreign affairs, I would at least dress more politely than this person does. Can't he even tuck in his shirt? Especially for a video interview which he posts to the Internet? Spare me. 'nuff said.