Jump to content

transam

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    94,597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by transam

  1. 45 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

     

    Why anyone would willingly orbit the festering swamp gas of your existence is a mystery only rivalled by the cretinous wasps who might entertain such thoughts to attempt such a gathering of limp wristed boomer fops.

     

    I can practically see it: you, strutting about like some tragic pound-shop alpha male, chest puffed, doling out imaginary awards to yourself while a sad gaggle of social lepers nod in approval, mistaking pity for popularity. Five people show up and you'll claim some sort of victory !!

     

    And the delusion doesn’t stop there. No, you have to go full messiah complex – suggesting others are cowards for not grovelling in your presence, as if your approval is some prize worth pursuing. You’re not intimidating, you’re just not respected – you’re the online equivalent of a damp tissue with delusions of grandeur.

     

    People like Trans and many others don’t steer clear because they’re afraid. They avoid your pathetic little pantomime because they’ve got no interest in parading themselves before crusty, keyboard-stained trolls who treat every glimpse of humanity like ammunition for their next attempt to trigger and provoke.

     

    Yep, that's about it..............:clap2:

    The strange thing is, he and another cannot see how stupid they sound because they are so thick................😂

    • Agree 1
  2. 7 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

    I know hero worship dulls critical thinking, but this?

    The logical potholes in your one-liner....


    Red Herring / Whataboutism
    The discussion is Trump’s hard-ball tactics at NATO. Dragging Harris in is a side alley—her hypothetical success or failure doesn’t change what Trump actually did.

    Appeal to Hypothetical
    “Could Harris have got this through?” invites you to debate an alternate universe. Hypotheticals dress rhetoric up as proof.

    False Dichotomy
    It frames the outcome as either Trump does it or Harris fails—ignoring every other path (e.g., collective bargaining, different timelines, another president).

    Burden-Shifting / Argument from Ignorance
    The naysayers must now prove Harris couldn’t have done it. Lack of proof against a claim isn’t proof for it.

    Implicit Ad Populum
    “All the naysayers” sets up a crowd-vs-lone-hero vibe: if you doubt Trump’s win, you’re with the naysayers. Popular framing, not proof.
     

    In short: a rhetorical shell game—swap in Harris, move the burden, and hope no one notices the original claim just left the stage.

    Brilliant..........:clap2:

    • Agree 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...