JonnyF

I hope all these mugs talking down on The US are putting whatever money they probably dont have where their mouth is and shorting it.

That would be highly amusing in 12 months time. 

4 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I understand your (and most people's) opinion on this, but what I have said is I NEVER SEE any mention of trans men in all these governmental actions that involve trans women. That's all I'm saying... 

And, as I'm sure you probably know, we (the USA) used to have that same binary classification of White and non-White. Even just 50 years ago, non-Whites were not allowed to play sports with Whites. But, because as time went by there were more and more mixed-race people, we eventually declared that if someone was only 1/4 or 1/8 or even 1/16 Black, they could be considered White. (The percentage varied from state to state.) Now, of course, all races are (supposedly) treated equally. 

I hope that will be the same with how we think of gender in the future.

It's because "trans men" do not want to compete against men in sports and they don't want to be strip searched by men.

They want it both ways.

Reminds me of back in the day when women wanted equal pay and equal everything else but still wanted to retire early. They wanted to slap a man and not get a slap back. 

Selective equality. Take the good bits and drop the bad bits. 

A bit like immigrants. They want the free healthcare and social security but don't really fancy the generations of hard labour that creates such a system. Just turn up at harvest time take the corn and then run back to the hammock until the mugs have created the next crop.

Playing the system. And rich lefties allow it because they see themselves as the privilged white saviours helping the little inferior people from themselves.

Awesome.

Harvard needs to stop biting the hand that feeds it.

Or become akin to Rochdale Polytechnic.

This is Xi saving face at the expense of his people.

Classic dictator behaviour. He won't suffer and can appear strong as China declines.

He can lock up dissenters like his puppy Starmer. 

Trump must be very disappointed by Charles lily livered response to the current situation in the UK.

I hope him and Vance explain things to him clearly.

Trump loved the Queen. Rightly so. I hope William can get things back to that level. Staring with removing the titles of Harry and Rachel.

On 4/17/2025 at 11:06 PM, FriscoKid said:

Don't take it from the "Lefties". Hear what people think now directly from the mouths of the "Righties" who are already feeling regret and suffering the pain from the <derogatory nickname removed>. Nobody even needs to make any of this stuff up. Sheesh. 🙄 

 

 

Clearly a lefty hired by CNN.

Next...

18 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Also, and I ask this in all these reports of how to treat trans women, what about trans men? Who searches them?  

Who searches "trans men"? Female officers of course.

Women strip search Women. That's the law. 

Talking of silver what happened to Clooneys hair?

Looks like my old PE teacher. 

All that's required is a combover.

Just now, Ben Zioner said:

 

Perfect is more like that...

I was expecting a picture of Dylan Mulvaney.

2 hours ago, Funkymover said:

why is it when a nutter and a criminal get shot,,, their family always lie about how they were such wonderful people... guess another statue will appear soon . 

I don't think he has enough convictions to warrant a statue alongside the lefts hero Mr Floyd.

Probably never even held up a pregnant woman at gunpoint. 

10 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

I quite agree...   In a country where the written law is already very good... the issue is lack of enforcement... 

 

... I don't see someone getting in trouble here for the actions of their aggressive dog mauling someone.

 

 

It happens.

Someone in my area just paid out 20,000 baht when their thai soi dog knocked someone off their bike in an attack resulting in the rider losing 2 teeth.

In this "pitbull" case the owner was attacked so who is going to pay who?

If the soi dog attack in my area had been a pitbull we'd have another thread like this. But it wasn't so nothing in the media. "Pitbull" attacks get more clicks because the uneducated are terrified of them. 

Reminds me of the fear of black people a few decades back. Education is the solution.

1 hour ago, Magictoad said:

Regarding it's upbringing: you are just speculating. Just guessing. You actually have NO IDEA how it was brought up. Pit bulls are dreadful dogs and in the UK & USA their owners, no better.

Not really.

He had been turned into a temple (abandoned) and then subsequently kept in a store room. Not exactly ideal for a breed that craves human attention and exercise. 

I've owned many bull breeds. Staffies, English Bull Terriers and American Pitbull Terriers. My father bred English Bull Terriers. Never known one that is raised properly that showed human aggression. Dog aggression? Of course, that is in their nature. But not human aggression.

Quite the opposite in fact. The original fighting dogs lived in the owner's family home and had to be separated mid dog fight by a human referee without being bitten. Dogs that were human aggressive were not considered worth breeding. 

Maybe you could do some research on the breed? Try to ban them if you like, you'll just get Cane Corsos and Dogo Argentinos doing the same thing. They are bigger and more human aggressive than PitBulls. Of course, a headline about a Cane Corso doesn't get as many clicks from the uneducated, although they are on the rise.