steven100

18 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

.

Lou , it was the 168 to Chumphon that got him..

very tragic event.

may he rip.

1 hour ago, john donson said:

always warms the heart even monks are infested with criminals, just like the rest of thai society...

sure are ...

Don't ya just love to see this sort of thing ....  makes a change from the fake smiles and crap you see everyday

45 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Sitting on the train between carriages having a smoke with his legs protruding to such an extent that something on or around the station platform collected his leg ripping him from the train. 

oh right '    very dangerous practice if that's the case.

8 minutes ago, RobU said:

Just a theory

He sat on the platform between  carriages with his legs dangling over the side. He took his shirt off because he was sweating. His legs hit the partial construction at the side of the track (which was not a problem if he had kept his legs in). He was dragged off the carriage platform by the force of the impact. He managed to crawl under the track platform where he died. I suspect his shirt will be found either on the carriage platform or somewhere along the track where it was blown off by the wind or dragged off with him. RIP 

yes,   not sure as it doesn't say how it happened....   I thought he was leaning out the door as the train approached the station and his leg struck something sticking out from construction material.   We don't know ...  or was he on the platform having a smoke  ?

11 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This may well be the case but if this bloke wasn't sitting where he was, and was not supposed to be, this thread would not exist and the man would not have died. I think a legal case would be hard pressed to get any compensation.

yes,   I'm not saying your wrong,  as correct, passengers are not permitted or allowed sitting smoking or loitering in-between carriages.   I'd like to see the intrusion he hit.  He must have been hanging outside the door.

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

You are not supposed to sit between carriages. 

Construction companies working on SRT facilities are not supposed to leave exposed construction obstacles or intrusions that could cause injury or fatality in situ.  

oh dear '   that's way too young to go with a farang,  she has to be 18 years old at minimum.

Should it be found that the construction intrusion attributed to his fall and fatality then one would expect compensation would be forwarded to the family, but TIT so who knows.

oh dear '  what a horrible piece of trash .....    he breaks into her house and makes out she was willing to have sex.

liar ... liar .... that's all they're good at. 

18 hours ago, G_Money said:

Shouldn’t they be shooting at each other on the battlefield.

yes ....... i thought it strange also ..... would you want to sit next to countrymen who blew up your family home ??

4 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

It was a joke.

 

Someone said "throw a bike".

 

You said ".22".

 

I said "do they make them that small?"

 

I'll admit it wasn't a particularly good joke. Like many it relied on the immediacy of the exchange, and doesn't work if it is explained word for word😀

it was a good joke ....  i'm sorry ,    i did laugh for 1 second 

42 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Do they make bikes that small?

why are you saying ' bikes '  ?    because the headline ask's what device .

was he riding a Yamaha   ?

1 hour ago, 2long said:

If you reach to the ground (pretending to pick up a stone) they will back off.

this is correct and i have used this method every time 

was the American riding a Yamaha 

China or China,  China, China or maybe China ..... 

1 hour ago, Korat Kiwi said:

I have a question to all these 'members'  who always reply to any of Bob's posts in the negative. 

 

What is your problem? 

 

Everyone that is registered on asean now is entitled to their own opinion and can post virtually anything within the bounds of the rules. 

 

But it appears that as soon as Bob posts anything, the troop of 'assassin's appear.  It's quite simple people,  if you don't like/agree with Bob's posts then either don't read them or use the block feature. 

 

I've only been on here a short time and I'm astounded by the amount of attacks on Bob. 

 

I'm sure he is probably a bit eccentric but that doesn't give licence to all these personal attacks. 

 

I could add a lot more but then it may see as a rant.  People please think before posting nasty replies. 

agree Korat,   some on here think everything is perfect everyday ... they need to take their rose colored glasses off and get out into the real world of thais.

It's simply a case of they don't like someone who knows the ropes, who knows what Thais are really made of ....  they prefer a green naive newby so they can do what they do best ...          you know what i mean   !

4 hours ago, webfact said:

but they did not allow entry to Thais.

    if you don't let us in to gamble we'll sing like a canary     !!

19 hours ago, mfd101 said:

The problem at temples is that there can be so many pairs of shoes or sandals and the occasional problem of theft ... My b/f once told me his shoes were stolen outside a temple. I asked him what he did. He said he looked around for another pair that fitted him, put them on and walked away ...

I hope he got a pair that were of similar quality & value 

34 minutes ago, brianthainess said:

The mentality of this bloke is beyond words. Did he really think she would want to marry her rapist. 

uneducated savages with brain dead parents