TallGuyJohninBKK

No, COVID is not just like the flu in the extent of illness and death caused, even in current times. Source:

I'm looking at issues pertaining to existing U.S. IRAs and Roth IRAs.... In the U.S., earnings and distributions from Roth IRAs are not taxable in perpetuity, period. Earnings from regular IRAs can grow tax deferred in perpetuity at present, but a person once they're in their early 70s would have to start taking modest annual taxable distributions. So when Thailand says they want to tax all income worldwide for Thailand residents, do they mean all undistributed earnings or only distributions from IRA accounts? And if they want to start Thailand taxing earnings and/or distributions from my various IRA accounts, it's not clear to me whether those would be protected by the U.S.-Thai tax treaty and-or whether I'd be entitled to a dollar for dollar offset on my U.S. taxes for Thai taxes imposed on my IRAs, considering there are differing tax rates involved.

"In only the fall and winter months last season, Covid sent more than half a million people in the US to the hospital and killed 40,000, according to data presented at the meeting. The people most likely to get seriously ill or die were unvaccinated, Link-Gelles said, and among the children who were hospitalized, half had no underlying conditions." https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/05/health/fda-vaccine-advisers-covid-shot/index.html AND "COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of symptomatic disease and hospitalization by about 50% compared to people not up to date on vaccination. Over 95% of adults hospitalized in 2023-2024 due to COVID-19 had no record of receiving the latest vaccine." https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/background/index.html#:~:text=Over 95% of adults hospitalized,of receiving the latest vaccine AND Still about 300 people per week dying of COVID in the U.S., better than before, but still....: Source:

If you bothered to actually read either the full OP news report or the linked full study report it's based on, you'd know.

The older Americans get after their peak earning years, the less they tend to spend. How much less? The latest DepositAccounts study finds consumers 65 and older spend an average of 20.8% less annually than all consumers — $57,818 versus $72,967. That amount varies significantly by state, too. We analyzed various data sources to delve into these differences and look at how much consumers spend in their retirement years on housing, food, transportation, Medicare, entertainment and personal care across the U.S. Here’s what we found. Poster's Note: the full list/charts of least and most expensive states including all 50 state rankings are listed on the linked website below. Also listed there are the projected breakdowns for each state by individual type of costs, such as housing, food, transportation, Medicare, entertainment and personal care. https://www.depositaccounts.com/blog/retirement-years-study.html

How about Udon Thani or Pattani? If I were a betting man! 🙂

My thoughts exactly!

Researchers who compared the ability of cloth and surgical masks and KN95 and N95 respirators to impede SARS-CoV-2 leakage into the environment show that the "duckbill" N95 won handily, stopping 98% of the virus that causes COVID-19. A University of Maryland (UMD) research team, which published the findings last week in eBioMedicine, collected breath samples from volunteers with community-acquired COVID-19 infections starting in May 2020. ... N95s as standard of care in healthcare settings All masks and respirators reduced exhaled virus at least 70%, but the duckbill N95 reduced SARS-CoV-2 load 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97% to 99%) and performed significantly better than cloth or surgical masks or KN95s. Cloth masks impeded more virus than surgical masks and KN95s. The study didn't test the face coverings as wearer protection against SARS-CoV-2 in the surrounding air. (more) https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/n95-respirator-gets-top-billing-stopping-sars-cov-2-viral-leakage-air Discussion "Our study demonstrated that N95 respirators were significantly more efficacious as source control than all other types of masks and respirators used in this study. Conversely, the KN95s that we used did not perform any better as source control than loose-fitting cloth and surgical masks. The finding regarding N95 respirators is consistent with a previous experimental study with manikins21 showing that N95 reduced more viral load compared to cotton and surgical masks. Another study also showed that N95 respirators blocked more cough-generated aerosols than cloth and medical procedure masks as well as neck gaiters.22 Importantly, our study further demonstrated that the inexpensive duckbill N95 respirators we used were highly efficacious even when used by untrained study participants who did not undergo respirator training or a prior fit test. ... All of the masks and respirators used in this study were efficacious as source control for SARS-CoV-2. They all demonstrate a source control factor of over 70, suggesting a substantial reduction in the viral RNA load when wearing a mask or respirator." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(24)00192-0/fulltext#

I wish the OP poll had had an option for "wait and see," because that's what I would have chosen. #1. They haven't actually adopted the policy yet, much less begun to enforce it... And look what apparently has happened to their prior adopted proposal that seems to have gone in the bin. #2. Even if they adopt the latest proposal as explained here lately, given the involvement of various countries' tax treaties with Thailand, it's going to be an individual call on what the particular impacts might be for any nationality and individual income sources. #3. I've lived in the same rented home here for many years with my Thai wife, who has a good job in Thailand. In our situation, I'm struggling to see how I could possibly do the less than 6 months in country approach, especially since I haven't kept a 2nd home back in my home country, and I'm not going to abandon my wife over taxes. That said, if they really go thru with the current plan, it might well hasten us to both relocate back to my home country. Too many unknowns right now, as usual....

And on average, still had many more years to live had not COVID cut their lives short: "The same figures reveal that the average number of life years lost per U.S. coronavirus death in 2020 was 14 years." ... In fact, life expectancy increases with age. While babies born in the U.S. today can expect to live to be 79, Americans who are 65 today can expect to live to 85, according to the United Nations World Population Prospects. Current 80-year-olds, in turn, can expect to live to an average age of 90 [emphasis added]. The pandemic, in other words, has killed many Americans who otherwise might have expected to live for years or even decades longer. A 65-year-old who dies from COVID-19 might ordinarily have expected to live until 85 – a difference of two decades, or roughly a quarter of the average American’s total expected life span at birth." https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/06/16/americans-lost-more-years-of-life-to-covid-19-in-2020-than-to-all-accidents-combined-in-a-typical-year/

The data you're citing is correct, but the impression you're implying is misleading, as specific people who manage to survive into their older ages statistically live LONGER than the average life expectancy for someone at birth... Meaning, people who have died from COVID even at older ages, overall, would have lived for many more years had COVID not cut short their lives. But it is a familiar and typical anti-vaxer attempt at misleading with the false "they would have died anyway" argument. Average Covid-19 victim dies years before they otherwise would What was claimed The average age of Covid-19 deaths is higher than the average life expectancy, which means that people who get Covid live longer. Our verdict This isn’t how life expectancy works. Life expectancy is an average, pulled down by people who die young. As you age, your life expectancy increases. People dying from Covid-19 lose about a decade of life on average. ... "Life expectancy is an average, which means it is pulled down by people who die young. It also means that life expectancy increases as you age. " https://fullfact.org/news/boris-johnson-whatsapp-covid-life-expectancy-cummings/

NIH documents show how $1.6 billion U.S. long Covid initiative has failed so far to meet its goals More than three years ago, the National Institutes of Health launched a $1 billion-plus initiative to find the root causes and potential treatments for long Covid, the chronic disease that has quickly changed the lives of millions of Americans. But a lack of visible progress from the initiative, called RECOVER, has drawn months of criticism from patient advocates, researchers, and lawmakers, including at a Senate hearing last week on the NIH’s budget. “We gave [the NIH] a chance and they bungled it,” said John Bolecek, who has lived with long Covid for two years and has closely followed RECOVER. The program has done nothing “to narrow down what’s actually going wrong with people,” or identify treatments, he said. As the NIH assembled RECOVER, it selected three core institutions to lead most of the research: New York University, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the North Carolina-based nonprofit Research Triangle Institute. Now, budget and other project documents obtained by The Sick Times, MuckRock and STAT through the Freedom of Information Act show how decisions made early in this process likely contributed to RECOVER’s slow start. (more) https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/31/long-covid-nih-recover-initiative-falls-short-on-causes-treatments/

The [U.S.] National Academies said the condition could involve up to 200 symptoms, make it difficult for people to work and last for months or years One of the nation’s premier medical advisory organizations has weighed in on long Covid with a 265-page report that recognizes the seriousness and persistence of the condition for millions of Americans. More than four years since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, long Covid continues to damage many people’s ability to function, according to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, a nongovernmental institution that advises federal agencies on science and medicine. “Long Covid can impact people across the life span, from children to older adults, as well as across sex, gender, racial, ethnic and other demographic groups,” it said, concluding that “long Covid is associated with a wide range of new or worsening health conditions and encompasses more than 200 symptoms involving nearly every organ system.” (more) New York Times https://archive.ph/zFWAb

Background from CNN: FDA vaccine advisers vote unanimously in favor of updated Covid-19 shot for fall ... "The advisers agreed that more people need to get updated vaccines. Only about 25% of adults have gotten the most recent shot, according to a presentation to the committee. In only the fall and winter months last season, Covid sent more than half a million people in the US to the hospital and killed 40,000, according to data presented at the meeting. The people most likely to get seriously ill or die were unvaccinated, Link-Gelles said, and among the children who were hospitalized, half had no underlying conditions. https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/05/health/fda-vaccine-advisers-covid-shot/index.html

Vaccine advisers to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [June 6] recommended switching the SARS-CoV-2 strain from the XBB.1.5 variant to JN.1 for fall vaccine formulations. The recommendation marks the third remake for the COVID vaccine since 2022. The measure unanimously passed, 16 to 0. FDA officials, concerned about further evolution of JN.1, also asked the group to discuss the possibility of recommending an offshoot of JN.1, such as KP.2, that may more closely match currently circulating strains. ... Improvements over XBB.1.5 vaccine JN.1 became the dominant strain in the United States at the end of 2023, but it continues to evolve. Offshoots such as KP.2 and KP.3—now overshadowing the parent virus—have an immune-evasive spike mutation combination that added more complexity to strain-selection considerations. ... In late April, the World Health Organization vaccine advisory group recommended a switch to a monovalent (single-strain) vaccine that contains the JN.1 antigen. (more) https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/fda-panel-supports-switch-jn1-fall-covid-vaccines

Re the notion that people supposedly are "changing their tune," in the video, about the 52 minute mark, Cuomo said his doctor has him taking about a dozen different medications to treat his Long COVID symptoms -- not to treat COVID itself.

Trump Official Denies COVID Conspiracies After Fauci Hearing Backlash Jun 06, 2024 "Donald Trump's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director has rejected COVID-19 conspiracy theories after Dr. Anthony Fauci was the target of conservative criticism following a contentious hearing on the coronavirus. ... Redfield weighed in on Fauci's hearing appearance and the conservative response to it during an interview with Chris Cuomo on NewsNation this week. During the interview, Cuomo asked Redfield if he believed "there was any conspiracy afoot to trash the economy or force the vaccine on people for profit of the men and women involved in running the government agent." "No. I don't believe that," Redfield said. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-official-denies-fauci-covid-conspiracy-1909012

It goes to the credibility and background of the person expressing the various opinions in your YT video. He has his opinions. Lots of other people and scientists disagree.

Regarding Redfield and his opinions about the origins of COVID, many others in the field disagree. What does the science say about the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic? February 28, 2023 ... But at the end of the day, the origin of the pandemic is also a scientific question. Virologists who study pandemic origins are much less divided than the U.S. intelligence community. They say there is "very convincing" data and "overwhelming evidence" pointing to an animal origin. In particular, scientists published two extensive, peer-reviewed papers in Science in July 2022, offering the strongest evidence to date that the COVID-19 pandemic originated in animals at a market in Wuhan, China. Specifically, they conclude that the coronavirus most likely jumped from a caged wild animal into people at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, where a huge COVID-19 outbreak began in December 2019. Virologist Angela Rasmussen, who contributed to one of the Science papers, says the DOE's "low confident" conclusion doesn't "negate the affirmative evidence for zoonotic [or animal] origin nor do they add any new information in support of lab origin." https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/28/1160162845/what-does-the-science-say-about-the-origin-of-the-sars-cov-2-pandemic

Inside Trump’s coronavirus meltdown... May 14 2020 ... "Here again, though, Trump’s stamp is clear. It was Trump who chose Robert Redfield to head the CDC in spite of widespread warnings about the former military officer’s controversial record. Redfield led the Pentagon’s response to HIV-Aids in the 1980s. It involved isolating suspected soldiers in so-called HIV Hotels. Many who tested positive were dishonourably discharged. Some committed suicide. A devout catholic, Redfield saw Aids as the product of an immoral society. For many years, he championed a much-hyped remedy that was discredited in tests. That debacle led to his removal from the job in 1994. ... “Redfield is about the worst person you could think of to be heading the CDC at this time,” says Laurie Garrett, a Pulitzer Prize-winning science journalist who has reported on epidemics. “He lets his prejudices interfere with the science, which you cannot afford during a pandemic.” https://www.ft.com/content/97dc7de6-940b-11ea-abcd-371e24b679ed

You know full-well what "excess deaths" are -- deaths in the population at large above and beyond those that would have been expected in the absence of the COVID pandemic. Excess deaths are this below, the majority of them being people who actually died from COVID itself, with vaccine-related deaths vanishingly small in comparison. Source: or this: The true toll Covid’s confirmed death toll — more than seven million people worldwide — is horrific on its own, and the true toll is much worse. The Economist magazine keeps a running estimate of excess deaths, defined as the number of deaths above what was expected from pre-Covid trends. The global total is approaching 30 million. This number includes both confirmed Covid deaths and undiagnosed ones, which have been common in poorer countries. It includes deaths caused by pandemic disruptions, such as missed doctor appointments that might have prevented other diseases. The isolation of the pandemic also caused a surge of social ills in the U.S., including increases in deaths from alcohol, drugs, vehicle crashes and murders." https://archive.ph/niVyc#selection-4443.0-4463.400 And yes, numerous studies, all of them undisputed AFAIK (not involving dodgy / discredited or disputed research or authors like some cited in the OP study) have found that COVID vaccines do not create excess deaths in the population at large. COVID-19 Vaccines "Vaccines are the most effective way to prevent infectious diseases and they save millions of lives worldwide. Like all medicines, vaccines can cause side effects. Most of these are mild and short-term, and not everyone gets them." https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ And research such as this: A safety study evaluating non-COVID-19 mortality risk following COVID-19 vaccination 16 January 2023 In this study of more than 6 million recipients of COVID-19 vaccines and their unvaccinated comparators, we found that recipients of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines had lower non-COVID-19 mortality risk than their comparator groups." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22015614?via%3Dihub

"The definition of “gain of function” covers both general research and especially risky experiments to “enhance” the ability of potentially pandemic pathogens to spread or cause severe disease in humans. Fauci stressed he [in rejecting Republicans' claims of lying] was only using the risky experiment definition, saying “it would be molecularly impossible” for the bat viruses studied with EcoHealth’s funds to be turned into the virus that caused the pandemic." [emphasis added] https://apnews.com/article/fauci-covid-pandemic-origin-congress-a66625482f25824476ee315484790230

I must say, the authors of the OP-cited study appear to have been quite selective in what kinds of sources they decided to cite and use (the discredited Fraiman and the disputed Ioannidis, as examples), and yet somehow chose to entirely ignore the multitudes of non-disputed research that has found no risk of excess deaths from COVID vaccines, many of which I've posted and cited earlier in this thread. It's almost as if, they set out with some kind of predetermined agenda to promote...

As previously posted above, the OP-cited study's references to Infection Fatality Rate data (footnote 38) are cited to research by the same Stanford University professor (John Ioannidis) who infamously predicted in 2020 that the U.S. would only have 10,000 COVID deaths, not the 1.2 million that ultimately occurred. Ioannidis in 2020: "If we assume that case fatality rate among individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 is 0.3% in the general population — a mid-range guess from my Diamond Princess analysis — and that 1% of the U.S. population gets infected (about 3.3 million people), this would translate to about 10,000 deaths [emphasis added]. This sounds like a huge number, but it is buried within the noise of the estimate of deaths from “influenza-like illness.” https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/ He missed the boat by a long ways on that one. He's a very famous professor and researcher who also has a reputation as being a COVID minimizer/denier: "Ioannidis was a prominent opponent of lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, and he has been accused of promoting conspiracy theories concerning COVID-19 policies and public health and safety measures.[5][6][7][8] AND "Ioannidis widely promoted a study of which he had been co-author, "COVID-19 Antibody Seroprevalence in Santa Clara County, California", released as a preprint on April 17, 2020. It asserted that Santa Clara County's number of infections was between 50 and 85 times higher than the official count, putting the virus's fatality rate as low as 0.1% to 0.2%.[n 1][135][131] Ioannidis concluded from the study that the coronavirus is "not the apocalyptic problem we thought".[136] The message found favor with right-wing media outlets, but the paper drew criticism from a number of epidemiologists who said its testing was inaccurate and its methods were sloppy.[137][138][139]" And there's a lot more of the same relating to COVID issues in the longer writeup below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ioannidis

Nope... According to the "stolen election" crowd in the House, that would be "lying" to Congress! 🙂 Arrest that man! 😞