Posts posted by TallGuyJohninBKK
-
-
-
--AI assisted
AND
Fact
"Findings from vaccine safety monitoring systems and scientific studies have shown that flu vaccines have an excellent safety profile. Hundreds of millions of Americans have safely received flu vaccines for more than 50 years. The body of scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports their safety."
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/flu.html
-
Flu vaccination can keep you from getting sick with flu.
"Flu vaccine prevents millions of illnesses and flu-related doctor's visits each year. For example, during 2019-2020, the last flu season prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, flu vaccination prevented an estimated 7 million influenza illnesses, 3 million influenza-associated medical visits, 100,000 influenza-associated hospitalizations, and 7,000 influenza-associated deaths. [emphasis added]
During seasons when flu vaccine viruses are similar to circulating flu viruses, flu vaccine has been shown to reduce the risk of having to go to the doctor with flu by 40 - 60%.
Flu vaccination can reduce the risk of flu-associated hospitalization.
Flu vaccination prevents tens of thousands of hospitalizations each year. For example, during 2019-2020 flu vaccination prevented an estimated 100,000 flu-related hospitalizations.
A 2018 study showed that from 2012 to 2015, flu vaccination among adults reduced the risk of being admitted to an ICU with flu by 82%."
https://www.cdc.gov/flu-vaccines-work/benefits/index.html
-
As for the flu and flu vaccines, info from a U.S. context:
What Is Flu?
"Influenza (in-floo-en-zuh), or flu, is a virus that can spread from person to person. It can cause mild symptoms or can make people feel very sick, causing serious problems that can lead to hospitalization and even death. Even healthy children and adults can get very sick from flu.
Burden
While the numbers vary, each year in the US, millions of people get sick from flu, hundreds of thousands are hospitalized, and tens of thousands die from flu and related complications. Flu also affects employers and businesses, costing an estimated $11.2 billion in direct and indirect costs in the US annually. Vaccines help prevent millions of cases of respiratory infections each year.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has classified the 2024-2025 flu season as high severity overall across all ages. According to preliminary estimates, there have been at least 47 million flu-related illnesses, 21 million medical visits, 610,000 hospitalizations, and 27,000 deaths, including 281 pediatric deaths during the 2024-2025 flu season. [emphasis added]
https://www.nfid.org/infectious-disease/flu/
-
- Popular Post
Predictably, another anti-vaxer nutjob as the source in the OP:
Here's who Ian Brighthope really is:
--
--AI assisted
And just who is the World Council for Health... the private group whose Australia affiliate was led by Brighthope?:
"The World Council for Health is a pseudo-medical organisation dedicated to spreading misinformation to discourage COVID-19 vaccination, and promoting fake COVID-19 treatments.[1]
The organization's online appearance is that of a mainstream health organization.[2] It appears to have been formed in September 2021 and its published leadership contains people which an Australian Associated Press fact check described as "figures who have promoted unfounded conspiracy theories".[3] The group was founded by Jennifer A. Hibberd and Tess Lawrie, an obstetrician and founder of the "BIRD Group", which erroneously promotes ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.[4]
The World Council for Health is affiliated with Children's Health Defense, an antivaccine association led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Council_for_Health
"Overall, we rate the World Council for Health a right-biased quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy organization based on promoting unproven and false claims regarding vaccines, Covid-19, and general health." [emphasis added]
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-council-for-health-bias/
But even with all those facts, let's be generous and see just what Brighthope's bio says on the World Council for Health Australia's website. Is he the kind of guy you want to be getting credible vaccine-related information and analysis from?
Professor Ian E. Brighthope
"Professor Ian Brighthope graduated in Agricultural Science in 1965. For the next three years he was involved in teaching and research. His research interests were in the fields of agriculture and veterinary nutrition, including the nutritional health of cattle, horses, sheep, dogs, pigs and poultry. [emphasis added]
...
It was in the fields of plant and animal nutrition that Professor Brighthope became aware of the importance of optimum nutrition and the use of nutritional supplementation in animal production, the treatment of animal dysfunction and the potential of this approach in the prevention and treatment of human disease.
...
He is currently researching the therapeutic potential of medicinal cannabis, a powerful health care therapeutic of the future. ... The nutraceutical approach is now used in many centres. Additional treatments are now included, in particular the use of the very effective repurposed drugs Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
https://wchaustralia.substack.com/p/introducing-world-council-for-health-54c
And here we have Brighthope spewing his false anti-vaxer nonsense, and being called out by Australian Associated Press:
No truth in COVID vaccine-related 'turbo cancer' warning
December 23, 2024
Australian Associated Press
"AAP FactCheck – Social media users are spreading untrue and unsourced claims that Australian "officials" have warned billions are going to die from "turbo cancers" linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
...
The only person quoted in the article to back up the claim is Ian Brighthope6, an integrative medicine advocate the article [falsely] describes as "one of Australia's most renowned doctors". [my editorial comment added]
Professor Brighthope is featured in a video version of the report embedded in the article and is identified as a "professor of nutritional and environmental medicine" (4 minutes 55 seconds) – not a virologist or epidemiologist." [emphasis added]
(more)
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/no-truth-in-covid-vaccine-related-turbo-cancer-warning/
Yeesh!!! Predictably, another major league anti-vaxer whack job!
-
-
Web MD has a more balanced assessment of the farmed vs wild caught salmon issue.... But it should be noted, their assessment is from the U.S. based on farmed salmon sold there.... not that sold in Thailand.
But they have these comments on farmed salmon "cons."
Difference Between Wild and Farm-Raised Salmon
April 21, 2025
...
"The negatives of farm-raised salmon are as follows:
"Persistent organic pollutants (POPs). These pollutants found in farm-raised salmon have been linked to type-2 diabetes and obesity. They’ve also been linked to an increased risk of stroke in women. One type of POP, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), is five to 10 times higher in farm-raised salmon than in wild-caught ones.
Added red dye. Wild-caught, natural salmon has pink or red flesh. This is due to their diet of krill and shrimp. Farm-raised salmon don’t have the same diet, so their flesh is greyer.
To achieve the natural pink look, farmers feed their salmon a synthetic chemical to “pigment” the flesh. This process may have unhealthy long-term effects on your body.
Antibiotics. Farm-raised salmon are given antibiotics to prevent infections. When you eat these salmon, the antibiotics can enter your body. This can cause antibiotic-resistant bacteria to grow and infect your body. "
https://www.webmd.com/diet/difference-between-wild-and-farmed-salmon
Yes, thanks, I'll have an order of farm raised salmon sold in Thailand, which more than likely is sourced from the cheapest possible sources for mass market consumption, with a side order of organic pollutants, added red dye and antibiotics!!!
-
24 minutes ago, shdmn said:
Just eat salmon. Most of it comes from Norweigian fish farms. Ignore the know nothing idiots here claiming the farmed stuff is bad for you and toxic despite zero evidence.
OK, so I certainly hope you will eat farmed salmon to your heart's content!
Farmed Norwegian Salmon World’s Most Toxic Food
Farmed Norwegian Salmon World’s Most Toxic Food A look into farmed Salmon and Asian Panga.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYYf8cLUV5E
Salmon farming exposed: Does the industry’s ‘green image’ stack up?
But what do we know about how salmon is farmed, what the fish are fed and what the environmental impacts are? These issues have brought the industry to a flashpoint in Tasmania which has the biggest salmon farming area in Australia. Thousands of jobs in that state depend on salmon farming and its future relies on a 'clean green' image. But in this investigation, industry insiders and a trail of documents challenge that, questioning the use of chemicals, intensive farming and reveal a corporate culture far removed from the marketing image of a wild salmon leaping from a pristine river. No one from the Tasmanian Government or the state regulator would be interviewed for this program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLIph7Ct-rQ
Can Norway’s wild salmon be saved?
DW DocumentaryFactory farming is threatening to wipe out wild salmon populations in Norway - due to the dramatic spread of parasitic salmon lice. Can the wild salmon still be saved? On Norway's vast salmon farms, a parasite is causing mass deaths of fish. Salmon lice have gotten out of control, infesting not just farmed salmon but also the wild salmon that swim between the sea and Norway's rivers. The parasites are finding their way into open water from the open-net cages of off-shore salmon farms, where millions of fish swim.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVOXMoJUBag
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Cameroni said:Dr Mellor believes it might be time for public health messaging about saturated fats to change to reflect the heart-protective benefits of eating small amounts of dairy, and to assure the public that full-fat dairy doesn’t have to be avoided.
"eating small amounts of dairy" as mentioned in the above news report is not the same thing, even close, to what RFJ Jr. is talking about:
America Stopped Cooking With Tallow for a Reason
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s view on fats is about bucking convention, not promoting health."Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s latest spin on MAGA, “Make frying oil tallow again,” is surprisingly straightforward for a man who has spent decades downplaying his most controversial opinions. Last month, Kennedy argued in an Instagram post that Americans were healthier when restaurants such as McDonald’s cooked fries in beef tallow—that is, cow fat—instead of seed oils, a catchall term for common vegetable-derived oils including corn, canola, and sunflower. Americans, he wrote, are “being unknowingly poisoned” by seed oils; in his view, we’d all be better off cooking with solid fats such as tallow, butter, and lard. In a video that Kennedy posted on Thanksgiving, he deep-fries a whole turkey in beef tallow and says, “This is how we cook the MAHA way.”
Cardiologists shuddered at the thought. Conventional medical guidance has long recommended the reverse: less solid fat, more plant oils. But in recent years, a fringe theory has gained prominence for arguing that seed oils are toxic, put into food by a nefarious elite—including Big Pharma, the FDA, and food manufacturers—to keep Americans unhealthy and dependent. Most nutrition scientists squarely dismiss this idea as a conspiracy theory. But the movement probes some unresolved, fundamental questions about nutrition. Are saturated fatty acids—the kind in animal fat—actually dangerous? And are polyunsaturated ones—found in plant-derived oils—really all that great for your heart?
...
The research has continued to bear out the dangers of saturated fats—and, crucially, the benefits of replacing them with polyunsaturated ones. The most recent version of the U.S. dietary guidelines caps saturated fat intake at roughly 20 grams a day. Federal guidance holds that “the best way to protect your health is not just to limit saturated fat—it’s to replace it with healthier unsaturated fats.” That is to say, no one should be replacing their seed oils with beef tallow." [emphasis added]
(more)
The Atlantic
-
52 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:
Russia has announced that its experimental mRNA-based cancer vaccine, Enteromix, showed 100 per cent efficacy and safety in preclinical trials conducted on animals. The vaccine, designed to target cancers such as colorectal cancer, glioblastoma, and melanoma, can prevent tumour development and promote tumour regression.
Exaggerated claims about Russia’s cancer vaccine Enteromix sweep across Africa
September 29, 2025
"In September 2025, the Russian Federal Medical and Biological Agency announced that a Russian cancer vaccine had passed preclinical trials with promising results. Following this announcement, posts spread on social media in Africa claiming that a Russian vaccine called Enteromix, which they described as mRNA-based, was a “cure” for cancer. The posts also claimed the vaccine was ready for general use and would be available for free. However, the claims conflated several Russian vaccines still under development and oncology vaccine specialists poured cold water on the claims, saying reliable clinical evidence for Enteromix is not yet available. [emphasis added]
...
Several Russian cancer vaccines are currently in development, according to statements by Russian officials and scientists. One of these is Enteromix, which uses viruses to attack tumours. Another one uses mRNA technology. These seem to have been conflated in the claims circulating online. [emphasis added]
...
Ready for market?
There is no evidence to show that Enteromix has been released to the public, let alone approved for general use, be it in Russia or anywhere else in the world."
(more)
October 2, 2025 - Corrects to state that Enteromix is not an mRNA vaccine and adds context about Russia developing multiple cancer vaccines.
Agence France-Presse
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.76UX8KE
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, save the frogs said:https://thehill.com/newsletters/health-care/5564158-rfk-jr-recommend-eating-saturated-fats/
New guidance encouraging the consumption of foods like butter, cheese, milk and red meat could be issued as soon as this month.
You should have more fully quoted the report, and the predictable nonsense of RFK Jr.s ideas:
"Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is expected to release new dietary guidelines encouraging more consumption of saturated fats, despite long-held medical recommendations advising against this. [emphasis added]
...
The American Heart Association (AHA) — who Kennedy accused of being “co-opted by the food industry” in a Senate hearing earlier this year — recommends limiting saturated fats to only 6 percent of one’s diet.
“Saturated fats are found in butter, cheese, red meat, other animal-based foods and tropical oils. Decades [of] science has proven that saturated fats can raise your ‘bad’ cholesterol and put you at higher risk for heart disease,” the AHA says in its guidance.
...
In evaluating the carnivore diet, the British Heart Foundation said, “Extreme diets high in saturated fat and low in fibre are known to raise cholesterol levels, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke.”
https://thehill.com/newsletters/health-care/5564158-rfk-jr-recommend-eating-saturated-fats/
It's predictable non-scientific nonsense from one of the biggest health misinformers in the world!
"Since 2005, Kennedy has promoted vaccine misinformation[1] and public-health conspiracy theories,[2] including the chemtrail conspiracy theory,[3] HIV/AIDS denialism,[4] and the scientifically disproved claim of a causal link between vaccines and autism.[5] He has drawn criticism for fueling vaccine hesitancy amid a social climate that gave rise to the deadly measles outbreaks in Samoa and Tonga.[6]
Kennedy is the founder and former chairman[7] of Children's Health Defense, an anti-vaccine advocacy group and proponent of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation."
...
Kennedy began experiencing severe short- and long-term memory loss and mental fog in 2010. In a 2012 divorce court deposition, he attributed neurological issues to "a worm that got into my brain and ate a portion of it and then died", in addition to mercury poisoning from eating large quantities of tuna.[465][467] In October 2025, his wife Cheryl Hines confirmed that a worm ate "a little bit of his brain and then died."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.
-
Not to mention the loss, at least in the U.S., of the following that also had serious cancer fighting prospects:
mRNA technology could hold hope for fighting cancer, but future is in doubt under RFK Jr.
August 13, 2025
"If you think last week's decision by the federal government to halt $500 million in funding for vaccine development projects that use mRNA technology will only affect COVID vaccines, think again.
These types of vaccines use messenger RNA, or mRNA, to prompt the body to make proteins that induce an antibody response to protect against a pathogen. The science behind it is also being studied for a wide range of other uses, from fighting cancer to treating autoimmune conditions and more.
Health experts have criticized the move to defund this research, pointing to the impact it will have on America's ability to develop breakthroughs against deadly or debilitating diseases. Jeff Coller, professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University, called the cuts a "completely reckless decision from Robert F. Kennedy Jr." that was "clearly being made for political motivations and not those that are rested in our science."
...
mRNA studied for pancreatic cancer, rare diseases and more
Collier said one of the most exciting avenues for mRNA technology is in the treatment of deadly cancers, including pancreatic cancer, which is fatal for many patients within six months to a year. In recent years, researchers have been testing the effectiveness of using an mRNA vaccine to target the cancer. A small NIH-funded clinical trial by Sloan Kettering in 2023 used infusions of an mRNA vaccine to help boost T cells in the immune system of pancreatic cancer patients. The results, published in the journal Nature, showed improvements among about 50% of participants. [emphasis added]
(more)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mrna-vaccine-defunding-cancer-treatment-rfk-jr/
-
It's good that some promising research into cancer treatments is still going on in the U.S., despite the following:
Trump Is Shutting Down the War On Cancer
America’s cancer research system, which has helped save millions of lives, is under threat in one of its most productive moments.
Sept. 14, 2025
...
"When America declared war on cancer more than 50 years ago, there was a misguided assumption outside the scientific community that it would be only a matter of years before the disease was eradicated — that defeating cancer would be no different than building an atomic bomb or putting a man on the moon. But there would be no miracle cure: As of this writing, some 40 percent of Americans will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their life.
What there would be, however, was decades of minor breakthroughs that would accrue over time, transforming both our understanding of the disease and our ability to treat it. One way to measure the cumulative effect of those breakthroughs is with statistics: In the mid-1970s, America’s five-year cancer-survival rate sat at 49 percent; today, it is 68 percent. You can also correlate America’s sustained investment in cancer research directly with these returns: According to a recent study in The Journal of Clinical Oncology, every $326 that our government spends researching cancer extends a human life by one year. Now an extraordinarily successful scientific research system — one that took decades to build, has saved millions of lives and generated billions of dollars in profits for American companies and investors — is being dismantled before our eyes. [emphasis added]
In a matter of months, the Trump administration has canceled hundreds of millions of dollars in cancer-related research grants and contracts, arguing that they were part of politically driven D.E.I. initiatives, and suspended or delayed payments for hundreds of millions more. It is trying to sharply reduce the percentage of expenses that the government will cover for federally funded cancer-research labs. It has terminated hundreds of government employees who helped lead the country’s cancer-research system and ensured that new discoveries reached clinicians, cancer patients and the American public. And the president’s proposed budget for the next fiscal year calls for a more-than-37-percent cut to the National Cancer Institute — the N.I.H. agency that leads most of the nation’s cancer research — reducing it to $4.5 billion from $7.2 billion. Adjusting for inflation, you have to go back more than 30 years to find a comparably sized federal cancer-research budget."
(more)
New York Times
-
A fuller version of the OP's post:
Cancer Study Links COVID Shots to Longer Survival
— 3-year survival twice as high with mRNA vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy
October 20, 2025
"BERLIN -- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients starting immunotherapy were nearly twice as likely to be alive 3 years later if they got a COVID-19 vaccine around the time of treatment, a researcher reported here.
Retrospective data in advanced NSCLC found that mRNA COVID vaccination within 100 days of initiating a checkpoint inhibitor was associated with higher 3-year survival rates compared with no vaccination (55.8% vs 30.6%; adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.71, P<0.0001), according to Adam Grippin, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.Analyses in metastatic melanoma mirrored the results, with 3-year survival rates of 67.5% and 44.1%, respectively (adjusted HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.69, P=0.0029), findings presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) showed...."The really exciting part of our work is that it points to the possibility that widely available, low-cost vaccines have the potential to dramatically improve the effectiveness of certain immune therapies," Grippin said in a press release. "We are hopeful that mRNA vaccines could not only improve outcomes for patients being treated with immunotherapies but also bring the benefits of these therapies to patients with treatment-resistant disease."(more)MedPage Today -
46 minutes ago, banglay said:
About half of my saved regular items have disappeared
They seem to have monkeyed with customers' Favorites lists lately....
I long had a long Favorites list with them with many items. But then one day not long back, most of them suddenly disappeared... And when I tried to add some back, others got deleted... It looks like they adopted some kind of system limit of items (like 10) per list....
So, I found a way around that... Their system allows you to create more than one named favorites list... So I created multiple lists called Fav 1, Fav 2, Fav 3, etc, each with about 10 items... And I've been able to keep and use all those just fine using that method.
-
Is It Safe To Take Ibuprofen Every Day?
This medication is best used on a limited basis
"You have a headache, so you take ibuprofen. Your muscles are sore from a workout, so you take ibuprofen. Your menstrual cramps are bad this week, so you take ibuprofen. Here’s the concern with all that: It’s really not safe to consistently take ibuprofen. [emphasis added]
...
Potential side effects of ibuprofen
"It’s estimated that NSAIDs — nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used to treat pain and inflammation — contribute to more than 100,000 hospitalizations and 16,000 deaths a year in the U.S.
One review connected 1 out of 9 preventable drug-related hospital admissions to NSAIDs like ibuprofen. When used incorrectly or chronically (long-term), the negative effects of ibuprofen can range from relatively minor issues — like diarrhea, nausea or upset stomach — to more serious health concerns. Your kidneys are your most likely organ to be damaged by excessive ibuprofen use."
Cleveland Clinic
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/is-it-bad-to-take-ibuprofen-every-day
But, regarding just occasional use as described below:
--Ai assisted
-
He also has some rather concerning patient reviews under his profile listing on WebMD:
https://doctor.webmd.com/doctor/alberico-sessa-6901863e-67fc-4114-8512-7695cf46c2d9-overview
-
Once again, be careful where you get your medical advice from, especially when being conveyed by dodgy social media "X" accounts:
--AI assisted
That said, there are a lot of POTENTIAL side effect and risk factors associated with Ibuprofen, seemingly a lot more than with Tylenol, especially when involving prolonged use:
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-5166-9368/ibuprofen-oral/ibuprofen-oral/details#uses
Get your advice and guidance on medications from reputable, credible sources.
-
- Popular Post
4 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:This is very true and there's a reason why salmon is so plentiful in Thailand and is typically the most frequently served dish at Japanese restaurants in Thailand.
It's relatively cheap, plentiful, but ridiculously toxic.
I mean, having an order of salmon sushi in Thailand isn't gonna immediately kill you... AFAIK! 🙂
But it's certainly not healthy stuff to be putting into your body on a regular basis, especially if the reason you're eating salmon is to improve your health via Omega 3 fatty acids, etc etc.
-
- Popular Post
Notice there's no source posted above for where the OP's getting his misleading and likely false claims above re Tylenol.
Tylenol / paracetamol is fine as long as you don't overdo the recommended dosage limits, or have some liver condition (including heavy alcohol use) that would complicate things. And only take it for as long as it's really needed, don't treat it like candy.
The anti-vaxers these days, led by Donald Trump, are waging a war against Tylenol, falsely claiming its use by pregnant women is linked to autism in children, which numerous credible studies have shown that to be nonsense... But hey, that's what you get from Donald Trump and RFK Jr. You DON"T want to be getting your medical / health advice from that pair!
Aspirin has its own risks...
Look for your health guidance regarding Tylenol from credible, authoritative sources like WebMD or elsewhere. But certainly not from the unsourced claims in the OP's post.
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-7076/tylenol-oral/details
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol
https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1082-3/aspirin-oral/aspirin-oral/details
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspirin
-
- Popular Post
The problem with salmon in Thailand is there's tons of relatively inexpensive FARMED salmon, bred in disgusting, dirty conditions in Thailand, Vietnam, China, etc and fed with all kinds of antibiotics and other unhealthy junk designed to prevent what would otherwise be rampant disease under those conditions.
Or, try to find the much more expensive, and harder to source, imported wild caught salmon, typically frozen here, from places like Norway or the U.S., which tends to be my preference when it comes to salmon eating.
There's a retailer based in Hua Hin who sells the Norway wild caught salmon fillets frozen, called Siam Viking, but their website has been down/dead in recent weeks for some reason, even though they're still in business, AFAIK. (They're still taking orders via LINE and payments by Thai bank transfer, but I prefer to pay by my U.S. bank card, and that they can only do via their now dead website....) ;-(
And then, more broadly, Gourmet Markets lately have been stocking a brand of frozen sockeye salmon fillets wild caught from the U.S. by the brand name Alaska King, 185b for 120g individual fillets. I haven't tried their salmon yet (have some in the freezer at home) but several of their other fish fillets that I have eaten and been good quality and good value for the prices.
The same Alaska King frozen seafood fillet products also are available online via their store on Shopee... But for some reason, going that route, they have a very expensive delivery charge (because the fish has to be shipped in chilled insulated containers) that makes the already somewhat pricey fish even more pricey when you add on the high delivery fee.
-
How dare you post real, factual, credible research here!!!
I mean, it's not written by anonymous internet bloggers with histories of spreading misinformation.
Where are the authors who lost their medical licenses or been stripped of their medical board certifications, and now sell fake COVID cures and vax "detoxes" from their websites to gullible prey???
I only wanna see "research" by authors who've had their prior reports retracted by journals after being found to have made up or otherwise monkeyed with the data!!!
FAIL!!!!. 🙂
-
-
Here, let me help:
Fact Check: US infant mortality rise not linked to vaccines
Updated November 13, 2023
"A report showing a 3% rise in U.S. infant mortality in 2022 compared with 2021 did not even examine vaccination of mothers or infants as a factor, contrary to posts online suggesting that vaccination played a role in the increase, which came after a 20-year decline.
...
Vaccination status - of mothers or infants - was not one of the factors examined in the report. In a statement responding to the CDC report, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) President Dr. Sandy L. Chung said there are many reasons for the 2021-2022 infant mortality increase, including challenges in access to nutritious food and affordable healthcare, as well as racial and ethnic disparities in accessible healthcare including prenatal care....The CDC, World Health Organization (WHO), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and evidence-based research support vaccinations for preventable diseases and reducing infant mortality. Reuters has previously addressed similar false claims that vaccinations were linked to sudden infant death syndrome rates in the U.S.VERDICT
Missing context. There is no evidence that the 3% rise in U.S. infant mortality rate between 2021 and 2022 documented in a CDC report has any relation to vaccinations; the cited report did not include vaccination as a factor.


How Vaccine Brain Injuries Were Rebranded and Erased From Memory
in Covid & Other Vaccine Studies
How I wish this kind of anti-vaxer nonsense was rebranded and erased from everyone's memory!!!
Yet another in the poster's endless repertoire of ANONYMOUS anti-vax bloggers of totally unknown credentials and credibility.
Real and credible sources on public health and medical matters don't hide beyond ANONYMOUS Substack blogs.... They publish their findings under their own names, often in peer reviewed medical journals.... But no, not this snake oil peddler.
--AI supported
Hmm... "The author has written in favor of unproven or controversial treatments." That certainly sounds like a died-in-the-wool anti-vaxer.
Is he really a doctor? Maybe he's a quack doctor like the anti-vaxers favorite doctor, Peter McCullough, who was stripped on his medical board certifications for posting COVID misinformation, and has had studies published under his name retracted by journals that found his claims unsupported by his evidence.
Or perhaps he's Pierre Kory, another anti-vaxer doctor who likewise was stripped of his board certifications for peddling COVID misinformation nonsense, and likewise had some of his published research retracted.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/113624
Or maybe the Midwestern Doctor isn't really a doctor at all... Who knows? The only thing we really know is he or she is some anonymous anti-vaxer hiding behind an anonymous blog who's make documented dubious claims in the past. Buyer beware!!!