Jump to content

kevkev1888

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kevkev1888

  1. 1 hour ago, Peterw42 said:

    Dont even mention the terrorists name or acknowledge the religion they are "acting in the name of", and you take away their power.

    Tell that to the families of the hundreds killed and maimed in recent attacks throughout  Europe in recent times.

    Just ignoring it will not make it go away.

     

    35 minutes ago, Grouse said:

    By condemning Muslims or associating these nutters as Muslims, you are supporting the terrorists goals.

    These nutters are Muslims. How can ignoring that fact help? 

    Muslims can only be accepted if they disassociate themselves from ideologies of permanent war with non-Muslims and moderate Muslims.

     

  2. UK: What British Muslims Really Think: The 615-page survey found that more than 100,000 British Muslims sympathize with suicide bombers and people who commit other terrorist acts. Moreover, only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists.

     

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7861/british-muslims-survey

     

    23% support the introduction of Sharia Law.
    32% refuse to condemn those who take part in violence against those who mock the Prophet.
    66% completely condemn those people who take part in stoning those who commit adultery.

     

     

  3. 4 minutes ago, iReason said:

     

    That would be my original post that you did not address and tacked the video onto.

    Instead deciding to go off on a tangent screaming: "IF there was anything, ANYTHING!!!!"

    Not sure what "original" post you are referring to exactly? Or exactly what you feel I need to address?

    The post I replied to and quoted in full was "originally" a response from you to another poster.

    You were pointing to a "complete lack of knowledge as to how the process works:"

    I merely gave my opinion that if there were any evidence it would have doubtless leaked by now. Hence, my personal opinion that as of now, there is no evidence.

    I tacked the video on as a support to my opinion that CIA, FBI et al. are leaking like a sieve, and out to get Trump.

     

     

  4. 12 minutes ago, iReason said:

    Nice try in attempting to change the narrative of my post. NOT.

     

    And stop shouting. You appear very upset...

    Not sure what you are trying to say re "attempting to change the narrative of my post. NOT."

     

    And stop shouting yourself. You appear very upset... :cheesy:

     

    Anyway no worries, I will leave you to your daily cut and paste fest, self supporting your narrative.

  5. 16 minutes ago, iReason said:

     

    And you are just making stuff up.

    With your baseless rant.

    :coffee1:

     

    I believe this is about the fifth time I have had to reply to this complete lack of knowledge as to how the process works:

     

    Perhaps you could write these folks and ask:

     

    Hello,

    Would the F.B.I., the Justice Department, the House and Senate Intelligence Committees,

    the Senate Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee,

    please reveal all your sources and evidence while y'all are  involved in ongoing investigations?

    I'm so impatient.

    Thank you so much.

     

    Or, you could try that with any prosecutor or investigater.

     

    Get back to us and let us know how it went.

     

    I think the point is with the embedded Obama leftovers, in the system CIA, FBI et al. are leaking like a sieve. 

    IF there was anything, ANYTHING!!!!

    It would have been leaked by now. 

     

     

  6. 35 minutes ago, alanrchase said:

    Obviously it is not the same thing. Never is when a Trump is involved. See the post above yours for another fine example.

     

    But it is not the same thing. Fact!

     

    It is a World Bank fund, she is not involved with its operation.

     

    Not an issue that I care much for, but she obviously does.

     

    She proposed the idea, promoted it, and according to World Bank President Jim Young Kim "This is really a stunning achievement. I've never seen anything come together so quickly, and I really have to say that Ivanka's leadership has been tremendous."

     

    Then I say, good for her.

  7. 10 minutes ago, alanrchase said:

     


    If you are interested Google "npr saudi ivanka". Have trouble posting links.

     

    Yeah. A great achievement.  Good on Ivanka!

     

    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/05/21/529417148/saudis-and-the-uae-will-donate-100-million-to-a-fund-inspired-by-ivanka-trump

     

    World Bank President Jim Young Kim "We thought it was a fantastic idea," Kim said. "But we had no idea how quickly this would build. This is really a stunning achievement. I've never seen anything come together so quickly, and I really have to say that Ivanka's leadership has been tremendous." The money will help kick off a $1 billion women's empowerment fund that the World Bank will announce in July, he said.

     

    The World Bank fund, which provides technical help and investment funding for women business owners, differs from the Clinton Foundation in some significant ways. While Ivanka Trump proposed the idea along with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, she is not involved with its operation.

     

  8. Liberal activists are ramping up the pressure on Congress to impeach President Donald Trump. Donald Trump has been in violation of the Constitution from the day he was sworn into the office of President.

     

    On July 2nd, We March for Impeachment!

     

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/18/liberal-activists-organizing-nationwide-impeachment-marches/

     

    Any of the TV Resistance participating?

     

     

  9. 59 minutes ago, WaywardWind said:

    It is not just one man's word against another.

     

    Two points: first, in any comparison, Comey will be given far more credibility than Trump ever would by any unbiased individuals.  Second, Comey prepared a record of the discussion immediately after returning to the FBI; such records are admissible under Federal law in certain circumstances and generally given great weight by a trier of fact.

     

    18485532_10211189678995651_1340201223587942565_n.jpg

  10. 5 hours ago, Andaman Al said:

    I have seen no media reports that he is a shape shifting Lizard, do you have any links? The tube however,  has TV interviews and there are radio interviews that suggest strongly that Trump has a very unnatural sexual fixation on one of his offspring.

    Well, if you are really interested feel free to search the tube yourself, you will find stuff on it.

    So far as interviews go, you can find someone saying just about anything negative you want about Trump, it's open season and a free for all.

×
×
  • Create New...