kevkev1888

1 hour ago, dunroaming said:

You just have to look at how Trump has backed down over his rhetoric with China. They are now wonderful people according to Trump.  The Chinese are all powerful in Asia and Trump knows he must go along with what they say over NK.  He is still blustering away but it is just that.

That is exactly how he has achieved their cooperation to this point.

Trumps tactics are to take extreme opening positions, gives more room for movement.

A very smart man. 

7 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said:

You're confused. It isn't the matter that's in question, it's the reasoning.

 

 

I am not confused. Thanks.

Please feel free to enlighten me on your opinion on the reasoning behind both threats, or not. 

2 hours ago, ilostmypassword said:

The threat may be similar but the reasoning behind it is completely different.

Indeed, one is actually a serious matter. 

Obama threatened the same over transgender bathrooms in schools. 

Who has their priorities screwed? Unbelievable!

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/12/politics/transgender-bathrooms-obama-administration/

6 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said:

I went to the BBC site which said that's what Rex Tillerson reported that the Chinese said they will do.

"US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has said China has told the US it will impose sanctions on North Korea if it conducts further nuclear tests."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39741671

I couldn't find anything else.

I guess he could have just made it up? Wouldn't be very diplomatic though would it.

Plus they already did introduce some sanctions already.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-announces-sanctions-against-north-korea-a6969256.html

Great work from Trump there!

2 hours ago, citybiker said:

Well in the past hour it appears Trump's more diplomatic terminology has prevailed.

China has stated that it will impose sanctions if NK attempt a 6th missile test.

Source: BBC world news.

Great work from Trump there!

7 hours ago, Andaman Al said:

I paid attention, I knew of the writing of the 61%, I am asking how do they know that? Don't you ask yourself the same questions?

Even the left wing bias Politifact admits this WIN.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/mar/22/donald-trump/trump-says-illegal-immigration-down-61-percent-ele/

On 4/16/2017 at 0:20 PM, Jingthing said:

trump's base now eroding!

Just how low can his approval rating go?

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/trump-base-supporters-turn-on-him-237200

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/04/23/donald-trump-approval-rating-poll-96-percent-voters-support-vote-2016-election

On 4/5/2017 at 7:34 AM, boomerangutang said:

Flynn was promising the Russkies the US would lift sanctions

OK you just made that up. Thanks for clarifying.

On 4/5/2017 at 7:34 AM, boomerangutang said:

Here is part of what Rice has on Trump.   She told Trump, officially, that Flynn was promising the Russkies the US would lift sanctions BEFORE he was in an official capacity. BEFORE Trump was inaugurated.  In other words, he was breaking the law by representing the US government as a private citizen.  Trump knew it, and also knew Flynn had lied to Pence about it, YET TRUMP DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO DISCIPLINE FLYNN FOR NEARLY 3 WEEKS !   Both Pence and Trump knew Flynn was a paid foreign agent (for Turkey and possibly also for Russia) before and during the time Flynn was in the administration AND IN ATTENDANCE AT TOP SECURITY MEETINGS. 

Curious as to how you think you KNOW this?

As I understand it all that is known is that the subject of sanctions came up.

22 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

A couple of Trump tweets that flew under the radar. 

Hmmm posting fake Trump tweets in the News section. Great idea!

BTW a couple would be 2, you seem to have posted a few.

1 hour ago, Peterw42 said:

I watched fox news today and saw some very clever editing, they played her answering another question and said it was a response to Nunes allegations. People see what they want to see.

 

Actually, if you look at the original broadcast, that is how it was originally aired. 

So if it was edited it was on the original broadcast and not later by Fox.

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Trying to shut down the investigation huh?

Errr? In what way are my comments on here in any way able to shut down the investigation?

1 hour ago, Andaman Al said:

Yes, if you are blind, deaf and mute and maybe also in a coma you are unlikely to know that the Trump team were colluding with the Russians.

So where is the actual EVIDENCE? If ANYONE had actually found ANYTHING of any substance it would have come out by now.

They have been on this for nearly a year, and still there is nothing,

She was asked about Devin Nunes allegation that members of the Trump team may have been swept up in the investigation of foreigners.

She said she knew nothing about it. But turns out she request the unmasking?

The outgoing Obama team then spread the info around, and it was leaked. 

She also lied about Benghazi.

And still no evidence of any collusion with the Russians.  

9 minutes ago, Andaman Al said:

Because there is no story unless you know otherwise.

 

It is absolutely routine for people in the right position to request the unmasking of individuals who may be caught whilst foreign diplomats etc are being surveilled. She never gave those names out to the public and it was within her right to unmask. Perhaps you ought to concern yourself with WHY Trumps team mates were unmasked! Generally unmasking is done if there is a risk of harm or violence towards the US citizen that is 'masked' OR if the US citizen were following a line of discussion with the person being surveilled that was detrimental to the National Security of the US. Please explain what it is you think Susan Rice did wrong and how that affects one iota the claims that Trump and his team were colluding with the Russians. Rice has nothing to do with what Trump and his team did.

Well she lied about it for a start. 

More to come me thinks.

Wot no story on Susan Rice?

I wonder why.

Good on Trump Ehhh.

Oh no sorry, bad bad Trump.

9 minutes ago, Andaman Al said:

Watch to the end - OUCH!

OUCH indeed, that's 7 mins 41 seconds of my life I won't get back.

Just to summarise, as always, NOTHING but hot air and wishful thinking.

1 hour ago, Andaman Al said:

Click on this link at the Washington post to see the graphics and links of the Trump Administration to the Russians. It is breath taking.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/trump-russia/?utm_term=.005d09add7f4

Quick add this one to the list: President Trump made remarks Monday about the subway bombing in St. Petersburg, Russia, saying that the deadly attack was “absolutely a terrible thing.”

Breath taking 

Islam and tolerance?

Sorry Europe ain't gona happen. They are bringing their own law with them.

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

I'm calling B.S. on that.

His agenda?

Health care? 

He promised care for all, cheaper and better.

trumpcare which he loudly supported and tried to BULLY all republicans to follow did exactly the OPPOSITE.

I suggest that it's delusional to actually think they represents him keeping his promises. Happily, trumpcare failed, at least for now.

In you own words "for now". Rome was not built in a day! 

Trump has instigated a lot of change, change that is badly needed, and there is much much much more to come. If he only achieves a quarter of it he will have done well.

5 hours ago, iReason said:

A massive majority of Americans voted against him. 

In a big way.

A massive majority?

I would not call 2% massive, slim maybe.

In a big way?

What does that even mean?

Less than 58% even bothered to vote at all. 

4 hours ago, farcanell said:

A bible bomb?

thats a new one.

next we will probably hear about someone will hurling a dead pig inside... lol

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-27941589

http://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2016-12-29/man-convicted-of-bacon-attack-on-mosque-dies-in-jail/