Jump to content

spidermike007

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    33,322
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Posts posted by spidermike007

  1. 2 hours ago, jayboy said:

     

    All true but let me ask you a question. Do you think this phenomenon whereby previously poor uneducated and - crucially -  deferential people get ideas above their station is welcome or repellent to the Bangkok establishment who decide on policy?

     

    Utterly repellent, of course. Any disturbance to the status quo, is strictly discouraged, and forbidden. Do not rock the boat, or disturb the gravy train. I think some Thais resent us deeply, for giving our women a widened point of view. An open mind can be a dangerous thing!

    • Thanks 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Nanaplaza666 said:

    You reply quit hefty for someone that isn't paying attention to the other BS . And how can you compare any place in the world with how it was doing last year ????  Seems like the anger got a hold of you and let you make quit dumb replies . Don't mean to offend just saying . 

    Yes. Bangkok. Sure it has diminished a bit, and it is bizarre to see so many five star hotels closed. But, the talent is better than Pattaya now, and a small number of places have closed. It is as close to "normal" as it gets. Only far cheaper for great hotels! Pretty close to paradise, for short visits! 

    • Like 1
  3. 35 minutes ago, PremiumLane said:

    I have the new 350, just traded in my 18 300 for it. I had done 40km+ on the older one so thought I would upgrade.

     

    Has a new engine and transmission, radiator is at the front now, bigger air box and body work has changed slightly to allow more air into the engine. Everything else is the same. Suspension is OK, it is budget but not too budget. 

     

    Overall, has more pull, not crazy amount more but it is noticeable and a higher top speed. The downside? Comes with IRC tires which are OK but noisy and just not as good as Pirellis. 

     

    Worth the price if you are buying new, or upgrading from the 18 model if you have put a lot of KMs on it. I use mine for commuting and other bikes for the weekend rides. 

    Nice. Yeah, I like the look of it, and the instrumentation. Would change tires, first thing, to Michelin or Pirelli. And the handling? Has it improved markedly since the river barge days of the old style Forza? 

  4. My personal opinion, is that for most people who speak the Western languages, they are able to think in circles. Most of us are taught the art of creativity, and the virtues of an open mind. So, if you mispronounce or improperly state something, an effort will be made to try and stretch the mind, to figure out what you have just said, and what it means. This is especially true of Spanish. Not as much with French. 

     

    It is not at all the case with Thai. If you do not nail it, it is your fault, and little effort can and will be made to accommodate your lack of perfection. It becomes a huge challenge when trying to speak or converse here. If the tones are not right, most Thai people are completely lost or unable, or unwilling to even venture a guess as to what you are saying.

     

    The exact opposite is the case with most Spanish speaking people, nearly anywhere in Latin America. And that makes it so much more rewarding. 

    • Like 2
  5. The fake Hunter Biden story is almost comical. So much nonsense. And all of this is.comimg from Raging Rudy. A completely discredited man.

     

    It alleges that someone delivered three laptops to a computer repair store in Delaware. The owner of that store thinks the man who delivered the computers was Hunter Biden, the son of Vice-President Joe Biden. But he can’t be sure it was Hunter Biden. Or maybe he can. He’s very confused about how this all went down. Anyway, the owner says he made copies of the hard drives and somehow sent the content, which he deemed suspicious, to some undetermined law enforcement agency and to the former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, one of Trump’s personal lawyers. It’s all very unclear how and why such a transaction happened – if at all. Was that even legal? If it happened. 

     

    Among the pilfered emails (sound familiar?) was at least one that seemed to suggest that the then vice-president could arrange a meeting with a business associate of Hunter’s in Ukraine. You might remember that Hunter’s Ukraine business involvement was the subject of the phone call that Trump made to the president of Ukraine to get him to announce an investigation of the Bidens. This call is what triggered Trump’s impeachment.

     

    Vice-President Biden says he has never met with anyone affiliated with Hunter Biden’s business and there is no evidence even in the new New York Post story that he did.

     

    So, basically, we are dealing with a third-rate, bungled pile of nonsense here. What’s a social media company to do? Platforms like YouTube, Twitter and Facebook have three choices when they flag potentially troublesome content. They can keep their hands off and let their users and algorithms do with the content what they wish to do, risking amplification.

     

    This was the standard method of dealing with hate speech, misinformation and propaganda for most of the history of these companies. Second, they can choose to keep the problematic posts up on the service but “dial down” the amplifying power of the algorithms, slowing distribution, giving their staff time to research the posts and consider if further action is needed. This is almost always the wisest move.

     

    Third, platforms could choose to block or purge an item completely. Given the scale of Facebook (2.7 billion users), YouTube (2 billion users), and Twitter (330 million users), deleting an item might seem like a major problem for the free flow of information. But it’s not. The original source remains untouched and accessible to most of the world. Nonetheless, by making this harshest of choices the platforms expose themselves to vitriol and risk generating the sort of backlash that can energize paranoid, conspiratorial movements like Q-Anon or Trump supporters.

     

    Content moderation, the term of art for such policies and decisions, is a fool’s game. A company can’t win the public relations battle no matter what it does. Companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google don’t owe anyone a commitment to publish and promote their expressions. They need not defend free speech.

     

    There are frequent calls for these companies to be more transparent and consistent in their moderation policies. But that’s expecting too much. Given the varieties of human expressions and cruelties, it seems impossible to predict all the different problems that might spring up that threaten people’s health, safety or democracy.

     

    Either way, content moderation is necessary. Nobody should want massive systems of content distribution to foster Holocuast denial or call for violence against ethnic groups. Some of these questions feel easy (although for some reason, blocking Holocaust denial seemed like a hard choice for Mark Zuckerberg, raising some serious questions about his capacity for basic moral judgment). Most of them are hard.

     

    Now, the unhinged Rudy has alleged there were underage images on the laptop. A desperado attempts to please his master. Anything for a vote. 

    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...