Bozo

Congratulations to "Thai Visa", its founders, managers, moderators & members for this useful website & enjoyable forum !...

Would similar websites on other countries have such a success?

Bozo:

Your "questions" are nothing more than not-so-cleverly-worded distortions and convoluted lies, resulting in twisting the truth to your desired outcome: that the U.S. is the bad guy, blah, blah, blah.. etc., etc., etc...

Here's the Truth: according to the BBC poll...

The MAJORITY of Iraqis are GLAD the U.S. invaded their country and ousted Saddam!

(Getting back to the topic of this thread)....

The U.S. is not the bad guy, nor is Irak(q), nor is any Muslim or Christian, nor is any man or woman (everyone thinks he or she is true, you know...), nor is any question or media, whatever true, manipulating, dis-informed, intoxicated or brain washing it can be...

"There is no good and bad guy. There is just a bench of guys, don't you see it" ? (ever watched "Zero Effect" ?)...

The fact of categorizing or labelling people in good and bad IS what induces people to justify the killing of other people. That is all.

I do not promote the killing of any human being, and therefore try not to label or categorize. My "not-so-cleverly-worded & convoluted" questions (always trying to improve...) and my only "hidden agenda" (that is actually quite openly shown) are only my attempt to help people to "make it a habbit to look beneath the appearances, with a solid sense of humour"...

It is possible that Iraki people are happy that Sadam Hussein was taken out.

Question 1: But do you really believe they are happy to have been invaded by the U.S. (which they consider as the "Big Satan", and in doing so , labelling, to justify terrorism) at the cost of millions of their lives (now and in the generations to come through slow nuclear irradiation) and at the cost of the loss/distortion of their culture ?

Question 2: Are you aware that every day of the Irak invasion, by the invading coalition army led by the U.S. were dumped unto Iraki soil the same amount of bombs than in the whole of WWII ?

Question 3: Are you aware that many of these bombs were nesting nuclear waste (coming from all over the World, actually), as it is now standard procedure to recycle it through the weaponnery industry ?

You can take the girl out of the bar, but you can't take the bar out of the girl 

Yes you can. But efforts have to be made! (Both)

There'd be a very small success rate I reckon. Do you know many success stories ?

A few.... a very few.

Just about your subject: Being cheap

Being cheap is not always in the sense of money....being cheap can be also understood in that way, you are talking to other people....

Johann

+++

keep the stuff

show it to her

when she's back

and watch the first reactions

and feel your heart

and talk it out

and get it over with

choice of

stay

or go

do it...

+++

I never thought I'd see the Bear Pit turn into a Forum for Jew-Bashing...

I hear it's all the rage in the Euro-Weenie countries now.

Sorry guys, but it is not the intent.

I love Jews, as much as any people on this planet, consider them to be a great people with huge courage and the underlying history that has molded most of Western cultures, so our today World, basically.

Some of my best friends are Jews, and I perceive them as some of the most clever & delightful people I know.

My only aim is to help people "make it a habbit to look beneath the appearances, with a solid sense of humour"... nothing else!

If my questions are without ground, not documented or not founded, then I do recognize it & appologize, as the Bozo that I am...

for some people

it's easy to cheat on other's feelings

it's hard to talk about feelings

it's indeed brave to share feelings in public

deep from the heart...

bravo

let the rivers of feelings flow

and all things will heal my friend

Good, and very true, words.

I can only say do what your heart tells you is right and never regret it.

Yep. I would even say: "do what your heart tells you, as it is right for you, and you shall never regret it."

I suspect you cannot do it yourself, unless you open a new account.

I also suspect it is still possible to do it indirectly, through the help of one of the Administrators of this Forum (George, ######,...). Just send them a PM (Personnal Message) with your request...

May I recommend you to please your wife (always ! ) and put "Falung Kenoke hook by salung" in your signature, then (with the English traduction beside it, should not be too long, for everybody to be able to enjoy it).

This is the spirit, indeed !

First of all, it's spelled "Iraq", not "Irak".

Second of all--are you for real?  Do I really need to try to address the "questions" you pose?  Due to the bias hidden in your questions, you've obvioulsy already made your mind up.  It's obvious you're not really ASKING, you're simply posing your rhetoric as questions in order to get your (dis)information out.

It's up to you, Mate. You're free !

You are absolutely right that all communication leads to something, and my questions obviously do ! If my questions seem too orientated to you, please accept my appologies, as I am trying to remain as neutral as possible. But I have to recognize that I prefer the path of life, rather than the path of killing...

Dis-information is similar to lying. I don't need to lie. Only weak people lie. I have specialized myself in uncovering lies, actually (and help people "make it a habbit to look beneath the appearances, with a solid sense of humour").

PS: Iraq is spelled Irak in some languages, and ultimately written in arabic in its originel language.

By the way, about the POET HenrikDK, could you please give me a list of the most stupid, clever, horrendous, smooth, violent, wise, polite, vulgar, educated, gross, ridiculous, reasonnable, laughable, sad & humouristics suggestions of "where he should go", as I would actually enjoy making a poll about him !?!...

Apart from us having fun...

It might actually help him to avoid a stay in the "Hilton" sooner or later...

Don't worry about it nick...

No-thing is important...

Indeed, nothing is important only because its opposite is also true, as everything is important !...

So why worry ?!?...

The confusion comes from the labelling.

A man is a XY, and a woman is a XX.

Whatever physical modification is made, the fact remains the same.

To the effect of reproduction, a XY has to copulate with a XX, this is life.

Let's publicize the word "copulate"; I actually love to copulate !

To the effect of pleasure, everything is possible.

XY can copulate with XX, many XX, XY, many XY.

XX can copulate with XY, many XY, XX, many XX.

XX or XY can "copulate" with whatever specy, tools & ideas they wish.

The aim is to collect emotions.

To the effect of Love, everything is possible.

But it has N O T H I N G to do with copulation.

It can nevertheless work in parrallel with copulation.

It does multiply by an infinite factor the collection of emotions.

The aim is to let the feelings be the multiplication factor.

Why should we label the habbit of copulating with whoever or whatever ?

Why should we label the copulation with or without Love ?

Why should we say some are good or bad ?

Why should we judge ?

Why don't we just appreciate & enjoy it ?

Question 1: Isn't the labelling a cultural habbit directly linked with reflexes of categorizing & judging, to the end of controlling (power) ?

Question 2: Whatever we do, are we a hetero, a homo, a gay, a qwir, a katoy, a lesbian, a bozo or rather a XX or XY, or even simply a human being, just ourself ?

So, were your potatoes successfully cooked ?

Taiquila,

Don't believe we've touched on the Mass Graves issue yet:

"Iraq's Legacy of Terror: Mass Graves," a new report from the U.S. Agency for International Development, illuminates this aspect of Hussein's brutality. The paper — compiled by USAID staffers Ben Barber and Stephen Epstein, with graphic, jarring photographs by Thomas Hartwell — is available online at www.usaid.gov/iraq/legacyofterror.html.

"In June 2003, I visited Iraq's mass graves, the most recent addition to mankind's legacy of mass murder," writes USAID administrator Andrew Natsios. "The bones tell a story of horror and shame: arms bound together, skulls pierced from behind. Hundreds in one long trench."

According to the study, 270 mass graves have been reported since Hussein fell last May. Since then, 53 sites have been confirmed. "Some graves hold a few dozen bodies," the authors explain. "Other graves go on for hundreds of meters, densely packed with thousands of bodies.

And, how about those 50 million folks who are currently above ground in Iraq giving thanks to Allah for the Collation of the Willing???

Boon Mee

Question 1: Does the fact that Sadam Hussein was a dictator (= leader who has taken the power without means of regular, normal & fair elections ) having killed thousands of his people, having had millions of his people being slaughtered in the war with Iran, while strongly encouraged, armed & financed by the USA (this is when weapons of mass destructions - gaz - sold by the USA to Irak were used... ), justify Anibody and for any reason to slaughter millions of Iraki people in return (through invasion, bombing, starving, killing & slow irradiation for the next centuries) ?

Question 2: Does it not level the Country(ies) doing this, to the same level than Sadam Hussein was ?

Question 3: Does it not lead to understand that the current Worldwide attempt to raise Muslims against non-Muslims in the World, with the obvious intent to create another holocaust (for whatever purpose), equals this same level as well ?

Is all this constructive or destructive ?...

And, how about those 50 million folks who are currently above ground in Iraq ...

I thought Irak population was about 23,750,180 inhabitant at the last census ?

I know it was before the last "Religion war", but I doubt so many were killed...

ajokeragain.... so, I guess it's A Joker Again.

IQ +++

I've agreed... with regards the stupidity of invading Iraq and that the Bush Administation has lost all the good will they had in the middle east by doing this instead of going after the perpetrators of 9/11.

Killing people, whatever the reasons, the manipulations, the action or the re-action, seems commonly considered as a destructive way to live, rather than constructive. When even only one person is killed, it is somehow the whole of humanity that is injured, including the killer.

There exists one and only one current World religion, and its name is M O N E Y.

This global religion/power/influence is currently in total control of all countries & religions of the World.

All these so called "terrorists" or "armies" are being blinded through conditionning (whatever the side) and currently sent to their death (suicide commandos in Chechenia, suicide bombers in Palestine/Israel, American army adding up dead & injured soldiers by the hundreds, Irak army, Afghanistan army, secret agents from all countries,...), in the name of this global religion controlling & manipulating them.

In the way, millions of civilians are being slaughtered: WTC, bombers victims in Israel, Ireland & Russia, hijacked planes, hundreds of thousands Afghani civilians through war casualties, millions of Iraki civilians through both war casualties, starvation & slow genetic irradiation from the World nuclear waste dumped with bombs on their territory,...

All the actors, such as Bush, Osama Bin Laden, Sadam Hussein, and other "terrorists"... are mere tools & toys in this game.

They do not have their say. They obey.

Also, how amazing to see that the scores are for 1 non-Muslim dead, there must be around 1000 Muslims dead...how conveniently provocative...

Question 1: why this deliberate lighting up of Islam specifically, at a global scale & conveniently coordinated in the same time frame, while there are Muslims in every country of the World (which haven't any contact with each other, anf therefore do not have the means to coordinate it) ?

Question 2: why are such current actions deliberately provoquing insecurity at a global scale, leading to an increase of the controlling influence & the reduction of individual freedom for everybody ?

Question 3: wouldn't a complete control of human beings on this planet (see "1984" by George Orwell), that seems on the right tracks, look like the safest guaranty of stability for those who control this global religion ?

Question 4: who does want that & currently controls this global religion/power/influence ?

In this instance I just got pissed off with what I see as a crapulous and racist post from the Gentleman.

You should have seen the post where he claimed that no Jews were in the World Trade Center on 9/11.

Maybe I can find it for the 'Best of PUD" thread?

Both tower of the WTC hosted daily about 50,000 people:

Question 1: How many Jews belong to these 50,000 people ?

Question 2: Were there any Jews in the WTC at the time of its destruction ?

Question 3: If not, why ?

Perhaps we should remain neutral on whether she is a good girl or not.

Who are we to judge anyway.

We are dealing with two hearts here.

Yep, probably the boyfriend's and the buffalo's !...

I bought as a place to live and not as an investment which I would suggest is the safest way to approach property purchase in Thailand.

Generally property is a good long term bet............

but remember this is Thailand.

They could turn round and change the law tomorrow so that you loose the lot,

no matter how you bought it.

The golden rule is

Never invest more here, than you are prepared to walk away from

Wise !

Indeed, nevertheless it helps the ego to feel good !!!...

I just found this forum recently.

But I have to say I feel a little intimidated some times about making a post. There  seems to be a few regulars who are a little quick to jump on someone about being a troll. I would hate to be labeled as that so I don't post as much as I would like. I have a lot to learn about Thailand and I do not want my inexperience to be consider as a troll.

Jim

Welcome Jim !!!

One way to exorcise the fear to be called a "troll" could have been to name yourself "Troll" i/o "American", for instance... then everytime, somebody calls you "troll", you have a good laugh !...

Why do you think I have named myself "Bozo" !?!...

Please don't hesitate to communicate more actively, the more the players, the better the fun !!!

bush's policies havent made the slightest difference to the danger levels in the world.

muslim extremists will do their utmost to cause the maximum destruction and disruption in western societies and in any societies that are at odds with their far fetched beliefs.

muslim terrorism, fuelled by the frustration of having to live within the strict confines of a religion that makes it difficult if not impossible to achieve any kind of personal achievment, sees the west as having the freedoms and liberties that they would like to have. mullahs know that once muslim countries have these freedoms then the religion would be diluted and forgotten. and the all powerful mullahs would lose their power.(just as religion in the west takes a back seat to personal achievment and gain for most people)

read about religious wars and persecution in the 14th,15thand 16th centuries to get some idea of the mentality of the mullahs who stoke the flames of terrorism

in order to maintain the hold of the religion over the people the mullahs preach hatred for the ways of the west with the result being a fertile breeding ground for terrorism.

if they cant have the freedoms we have then they will seek to destroy our rights to those freedoms.

radical islam is not tolerant of the ways of the infidel and is a great danger to western democracy.

if the dangers of muslim terrorism are not taken seriously and stopped then they will surely succeed in taking us all back to the middle ages within a few generations.

how to stop it ?? ive no idea.

but appeasment and dialogue are not the answer.

i think that in years to come as the west realises that it cant prevent terrorism by containment it will have to pursue it in a very, veryaggressive way in order to preserve our own integrity.

my view is that the future does not look good.

Killing people, whatever the reasons, the manipulations, the action or the re-action, seems commonly considered as a destructive way to live, rather than constructive. When even only one person is killed, it is somehow the whole of humanity that is injured, including the killer.

There exists one and only one current World religion, and its name is M O N E Y.

This global religion/power/influence is currently in total control of all countries & religions of the World.

All these so called "terrorists" or "armies" are being blinded through conditionning (whatever the side) and currently sent to their death (suicide commandos in Chechenia, suicide bombers in Palestine/Israel, American army adding up dead & injured soldiers by the hundreds, Irak army, Afghanistan army, secret agents from all countries,...), in the name of this global religion controlling & manipulating them.

In the way, millions of civilians are being slaughtered: WTC, bombers victims in Israel, Ireland & Russia, hijacked planes, hundreds of thousands Afghani civilians through war casualties, millions of Iraki civilians through both war casualties, starvation & slow genetic irradiation from the World nuclear waste dumped with bombs on their territory,...

All the actors, such as Bush, Osama Bin Laden, Sadam Hussein, and other "terrorists"... are mere tools & toys in this game.

They do not have their say. They obey.

Also, how amazing to see that the scores are for 1 non-Muslim dead, there must be around 1000 Muslims dead...how conveniently provocative...

Question 1: why this deliberate lighting up of Islam specifically, at a global scale, while there are Muslims in every country of the World ?

Question 2: why are such current actions deliberately provoquing insecurity at a global scale, leading to an increase of the controlling influence & the reduction of individual freedom for everybody ?

Question 3: wouldn't a complete control of human beings on this planet (see "1984" by George Orwell), that seems on the right tracks, look like the safest guaranty of stability for those who control this global religion ?

Question 4: who controls this global religion ?