Jump to content

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,118
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

josephbloggs last won the day on February 7 2018

josephbloggs had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Location
    Bangkok

Previous Fields

  • Location
    Bangkok

Recent Profile Visitors

15,731 profile views

josephbloggs's Achievements

Ruby Member

Ruby Member (10/14)

  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • 10 Posts
  • Conversation Starter
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

12.2k

Reputation

  1. Another barramarra made up video. It is a video of nothing with an AI voiceover. It doesn't show anything, literally nothing. "Listen to how he rips in to Khan". Ok, where was that in the clip? Seems they must have edited that out before I watched it. Then "Farage waded in". Did he? Where was that in the clip? Seems they must have edited that out before I watched it too. Barramarra, sitting around watching all these AI videos of nothing, all day long. What an existence. And all the spelling and grammar mistakes in the subtitles, superb.
  2. "Blocked by Procedural Conspiracies", aka "Lost Elections". Conspiracy nonsense, it is hilarious.
  3. No, the only reason PIA is allowed to resume flights to the UK is because the UK CAA - an independent body, did you not watch the last five seconds of the GB news "report" I linked to where they admitted this? - has certified them as safe to fly. Similar to the EASA which certified them safe last year and seemingly similar to the US FAA which re-audited them in March and is apparently not far away from regranting CAT 1 status. No other reason. They are independent bodies as even your GB News admits (remember the five second link that you refuse to click?) I can't believe you post videos every day and expect people to sit through them even though you don't watch them to the end yourself. And then when I link to a 5 second second clip of your own video that contradicts everything......you don't watch it. It shows you are not interested in truth, only interested in your agenda.
  4. That sounds horrendous. And no, I would not ever choose to fly PIA myself. But I do trust the EASA and the UK CAA, so if they certify them safe I trust they are.
  5. You video won't load but I agree with you Barra. I read the reports from today and their excuses are laughable. But, "at last a news report"? I read about it today on the BBC news site as part of their regular reporting by the way - where all their main reports have been. Anyway, their squirming and excuses are ridiculous and I hope this all gets taken in to account at their sentencing. Wow, I agreed with Barra.
  6. Ha ha ha ha!! Oh dear, Barra, watching your channels again? Do you see the headline there? In big letters no less: Labour Grant Pakistan UNSAFE Flights to UK as blah blah blah". Saw it, right? Made you angry, right? I know you will never get to the end of the report as you get angry at the beginning and bash your keyboard in a GB News induced rage. Here, I'll help you, the very last 5 seconds of the report they say what they need to that contradicts the entirety of the proceeding "report". They know no-one will pay attention to a rushed sentence at the end, much like a radio advert disclaimer. The last 5 seconds, here, you can listen to it, the below link takes you directly there. You only have to spend five seconds. "UK ministers do not have involvement in the decisions of the UK air safety committee". Click it and spend five seconds, please. Doesn't tally with their headline of LABOUR granting UNSAFE FLIGHTS or their wider agenda does it? It is nonsense. Please click...do you think that was an impartial report having listened to the last five seconds? Just click, please, five seconds Barra, five seconds, it might open your eyes, I prepared the video and it is cued in the right place for you. The UK Air Safety Committee decides who can and can't fly to the UK and they are not government controlled - that would be ridiculous wouldn't it. It has safety first and foremost, it cannot and does not have a political agenda as that would endanger all of our safety. The Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority has spent the last two years upgrading substantially their safety standards. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency lifted their ban in November 2024. The UK Air Safety Committee held a review in March and formally cleared them in July. A US FAA inspection team visited Pakistan in mid-March 2025 as well and conducted their own safety audit, signed a MoU and likely they'll receive CAT 1 certification again soon, much as Thai Airways did recently. Any thoughts on LABOUR granting them UNSAFE FLIGHTS?
  7. International firms will definitely be bidding on the construction but it won't be financed by China unlike the other places you mentioned.
  8. I don't need to, I know what I was insinuating - that it was the truck driver's fault, as I clearly said. I see you trolling in other threads this morning too, winding people up as usual. Stop trolling in this one, it is a tragic story and doesn't need your nonsense.
  9. Thanks Mr Inane Emoji man for another incredible contribution, right up to your usual standards. Maybe in your rush to get your emojis out you missed the part where I said: Undoubtedly the truck's fault. So where did I say it was the cop's fault? Where do you get off on making claims up?
  10. Sad. I know that junction very well, pass through it many times a week. Undoubtedly the truck's fault but wonder why the policeman didn't notice it? It had headlights on and was moving at a constant speed, odd that he just continued until the last moment when he ditched the bike. RIP.
  11. Correct, it was a renewal of a one year extension. However I didn't get a home visit during my first 12 month extension last year either. Whether my previous 28 year history (always non B extensions based on employment) was taken in to account I have no idea. Or maybe CW just have too many applicants to bother with home visits unless they are suspicious about something.
  12. Still much faster and much much better value than HS2 is managing in the UK.
  13. Yes, you're wrong. Operational speed will be 250km/h. That particular train is designed for up to 400km/h though, but not in Thailand.
×
×
  • Create New...