Right; nor, alas, even a Dickens biographer, what with writing fatuous Dickens posts on a public forum. First, confusing and making up the most basic details about Dickens’ well-documented life; then, from a hopeless muddle, inevitably pulling out a laughable conclusion—well. Not that having the facts straight would help your case anyway. @Sparktrader knows that.
But why? Ignorance? Dotage? Trolling, to be sure.
The good news, however, is that having failed to win the mistress, you may still hope to woo the maid. Instead of biographer, aspire to Dickens Googler.
Unconvincing. The REAL POINT being that Rubbish is always found in the usual places. For example,
A notably pretentious example of the Dunning-Kruger effect, more amusing than your last. Keep ‘em coming.
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a hypothetical cognitive bias stating that people with low ability at a task overestimate their own ability, and that people with high ability at a task underestimate their own ability.
As described by social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the bias results from an internal illusion in people of low ability and from an external misperception in people of high ability . . . .It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from people's inability to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, people cannot objectively evaluate their level of competence.
--Dunning–Kruger effect