LivinLOS

The confusion is that no law was made.. 120 days before 9th June they took cannabis off the narcotics list entirely.. Extracts made from cannabis (any processing, food, oils, wax, etc) was ether OK under 0.2% and controlled by FDA as a CBD product or over 0.2% as a narcotic and still only possible with a prescription. They fully expected to create and pass laws in the time between publication and it being law. Conservative voices fully expected all THC parts to be controlled. Somehow Thailand failed to make any law (accidentally on purpose ??) so it effectively decriminalized the plant entirely, not what most officials voted for. A law may come, but right now there isnt one T_0001.pdf

Until hey make a law that this is illegal, draft it, publish it in the royal gazette and time passes for it to become law.. They are doing nothing wrong.. You cannot raid a legal business.. IF they change the law sure.. If they have extracts sure.. But the law is open now.

Attention deficit disorder.. Meaning she wasnt getting enough attention..

Comes down to the bank.. You will do better with a more 'expat friendly' bank like HSBC. Barclays closed my accounts after 20 years banking there with short notice, they refuse to say why but that account was Thai address based.

The point that is completely wrong is that the 0.2% limit applies to plants in any way. The 0.2% THC limit is only for 'extracts' made from the plant.. Not the plant itself. Please check online before you comment ????

RIP Keith.. Nice guy with decades of ride experience.. Theres a certain level of basic road user ignorance that no amount of defensive driving can avoid.

And cannabis is no longer a narcotic..

Your talking about the removal of cannabis from the narcotic list.. Which passed.. 120 days before June 9th. All that did was deregulate it as a scheduled narcotic. The cannabis control act, which will have regulations on sales, licensing, etc etc etc.. Has not been drafted.. As you can read in many different sources including this one. Currently there is an absence of law and near free for all (only extracts hence any product made from or with cannabis) are regulated.

Thats totally ISNT the law.. You have to have a reading comprehension issue if your still dont understand that it is only EXTRACTS which have a THC limit. Its been repeated clearly and directly over and over for days, including in the very article your replying to..

and which law is that.. they didnt write one yet !!

Openly for sale in cafes in chiang mai yesterday.. When they do come around to drafting this law they are going to really struggle to put the genie back in the bottle.. I have a gut feeling that the draft laws (which were going to be strict, buds would not have been openly available) may have been purposefully delayed to end run the process that wouldnt get past conservative reads in parliment.

In the west Google pay or a fallback contactless card.. All so simple and if you use the right banking apps all with auto budgeting and categorization of spending etc... All for it (less so Thais QR systems and no consumer protection).

What a wonderful mess ???? They said when it was taken off the narcotics list 90 days ago that the associated laws and controls would all be drafted and debated by the time it happened.. They ballsed the whole thing up and now theres no laws ???? you really couldnt make it up.. Tomorrow.. Can you give it to schoolchildren ?? Yes according to the law.. Are there licenses and rules of sale ?? Nope.. Asprin has more control than cannabis in 4 hours time.. From hardcore to total free for all, due to an inability to manage any process effectively.. Great tho !!

Right so superb company to aspire to keep yeah ?? Thailand, equal to N Korea.. I can see they will be flocking with that slogan..

1000s are being released for exactly that reason. It is no longer a narcotic on June 9th.. But none of the laws have even been debated let alone written and passed. Can you sell it ?? Who too ?? What licensing is needed for supply ?? What controls will be in place.. Everything from Asprin on up has some form of controls and rules, this will be no different. It not being illegal wont be the whole story. What is sure is that home growing for your own medical needs (cooking etc) will not be illegal in 30 hours.

and many are cheating and including a lot more than 0.2% THC.. OK these may not be 1000 mg Joey Diaz specials like some California dispensary but they use code like 'full spectrum extract' to indicate thc included even with regular online ordering platforms (lazada shopee etc). Wife bought some off a lazada store, branded product etc marked 'full spectrum' and it definitely had THC content. Locally to me there's very open businesses offering oils, gummys, brownies etc and its potent. The effective control is definitely lax.

exactly... Chao baan is rental house.. Is this rental husband (or rentee ??) ??

If doing so causes reputational damage the person can be charged. The definition of reputational damage is so broad as to to be any loss of face. Its already happening.. Traffic report page blurring out traffic offenders.

incorrect.. In the UK recording of images in a public place is allowed by law and any statement that is factually true is not libelous or slander. You do comprehend the difference here ??

Name 1 other country where the libel / defamation law is not based on if it is true or not, only on if the persons reputation is damaged ??

How does that determine your a resident, you want them to ask become experts on every extension and under consideration stamp. Plus being forced to carry my passport everywhere ?? No thanks. Pink ID is ideal. Shows a level of commitment.

Driving tests are usually salvia testing (followed up by blood testing) which as generally 12 plus hours going out to max 36 on heavy users.. The problem with these tests they are binary yes / no and dont indicate level of intoxication. This is why follow up blood testing is needed. It will be interesting to see what they manage to handle in this.

But the plant matter itself isnt 'extract' is the point that seems to have morphed in recent weeks.. You can have a 20% THC bud, and as long as its not processed its not illegal (is how they are now talking).

and here we get to the 'reputational damage' part of the problem.. Theres no allowance for the behavior being factual, the same as defamation also has no relevance to the statement being true or not. Only is it damaging to the party recorded.