Jump to content

klauskunkel

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    14,063
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by klauskunkel

  1. 5 hours ago, webfact said:

    Prayut only met two of the four criteria – he worked full-time for the authorities under the law and was paid for his job.

    since this is the ombudsman nitpicking, I'd like to correct this statement

    Prayut only meets one of the four criteria: he gets paid for what he is doing or not doing.

    He does not work full-time for the authorities under the law, the authorities work full-time for him under his law.

  2. 4 hours ago, webfact said:

    “If it’s advertised as an alcohol-free malt beverage, there’s no problem, but if it’s advertised as an alcohol-free beer, we have to examine the intention and whether the advertising is breaking any law,”

    I think this case needs Prawit's expertise, once he is done reviewing rural roads speeds.

×
×
  • Create New...