tilaceer

If that was true, it certainly wouldn't include either of them.

Now you are just embarrassing yourself.

QED

Not as tall as he wants people to think. Low self esteem fixed by wearing Steven Seagal coats and shoe lifts. Come to think of it, Seagal and Trump have a lot in common. Wonder if Seagal has made any PP videos ?

I was answering a question from someone. You care, else you would not have responded. You just cant help yourself, can you ?

No different to Trump. Why don't you ridicule him because of his height discrepancies ? But its good you did some research. 6 foot 3

or like you have to change profiles. Hopefully the next one isn't far away

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_presidents_and_presidential_candidates_of_the_United_States#:~:text=Kamala Harris%2C the current vice,2 inches (164 centimeters). Snap

Kamala Harris, the current vice president, is 5 feet 41⁄2 inches (164 centimeters).

More BS alternate facts. Harris is 1.64. Maybe she should wear lifts like Trump to try and look taller. Don't you ever do any research before you post your tripe ?

Trumps major propagandist Steven Cheung stated that, if need be, they would release their video footage that supports their version. However, when asked to supply this footage, Cheung did not respond. Go figure.

1. I am aware of the student deferments, but that wasn't my question. You felt you had to respond to a nickname given to Trump, by saying something equally derisive about Biden. My question to you is: Did Biden supply a false medical report to escape the draft, or was his asthma condition legitimate ? A simple yes or no answer. 2. Biden DOES attend ceremonies, when it is convenient. What does that even mean ? Please provide me with ANY major military ceremonies that Biden skipped because it wasn't deemed as "convenient". Like many of his predecessors, both President and VP, both Democrat and Republican, Biden loves his country, is a true patriot and has a great sense of duty and recognises the responsibilities that his position entails, (Trump is by far the exception to this list). He would not voluntarily miss any ceremony that pays tribute to the fallen. 3. He seems to get bored easy, (supposition m'lord) ! He's 81 !! Sure his mind wanders, or he becomes forgetful or god forbid, he looks at his watch, but he is still able to perform his current role, especially with the advisors that he has around him. Plus he will be gone soon, so don't worry. Start to focus more of your angst against Harris. 4. Biden wasn't invited. Not sure why this is even relevant to Trumps photo op at Arlington, but I know what you are trying to segue to. There is no doubt that the families of these men feel that Biden, or the Democrats, are either partly or fully responsible for the deaths of their loved ones. It's tragic and I get it. But Trump can, or should, also shoulder some of the blame for what happened as he was the one who pressured the Afghan's to release over 5.000 Taliban prisoners who then took part in the overthrow of the the existing Afghan government which, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster described as "we threw the Afghans under the bus on the way out". However, this topic is not relevant to the current posting and I only include this as a rebuttal to what you have submitted.

Did Joe fake a medical certificate to get an exemption, (please dont start the "where's the link/proof..even though the doctor admitted he faked the certificate) ? Trump was invited to the wreath laying ceremony, (a private affair),Biden wasn't. Trump saw it as a photo op and political campaign advert only. Has Biden ever not attended a military ceremony when required, unlike Trump who wouldn't go because it was raining, or because the cemetery was full of losers ? And then he poses for a thumbs up photograph in front of the grave of a marine. Its ok for the family member to pose like this, but Trump ???????

Keeping up. The 34 charges were “stepped up” from misdemeanors to class E felonies because prosecutors said the crimes were carried out in an effort to commit or conceal another crime – these crimes being election conspiracy and campaign finance and tax law violations, (hardly politically motivated). Whilst it is unlikely that Trump would face incarceration, each charge carries a possible 4 year prison term.

Ouch ! That hurts.

Short on facts, long on hyperbole.

The SCOTUS only gave "robust immunity" under certain circumstances. So, if he feels he has removed all the immunity obstacles from the four indictments and now can present to Judge Chutkan the documentation that she requested, (from both parties), when, in your opinion, should he have filed ? What would you have done ? In legal terms, one of Trumps major tactics has always been delay, delay, delay. Jack Smith wants to ensure that this case moves forward as expeditiously as possible, which seems perfectly reasonable.

Rubbish. In 1988, the Supreme Court ruled that independent counsels were constitutional, as the appointment clause also states that “Congress may vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.” The Attorney General’s regulations provide for appointment of special counsel by the Attorney General. Did you complain when John Durham was appointed as special counsel ? Did you complain when Robert Hur was appointed as special counsel ? What about David Weiss being appointed as special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden ? Why did Scarsi not quash the charges against Biden under the same Cannon ruling ? Care to comment on those...I bet you don't.

The courts decision to try and protect Trump with their presidential criminal immunity decision was extremely flawed. Trump then believed, wrongly, that those charges were henceforth dismissed. If Trump is guilty as charged then he should not simply be able to walk away, though it seems that is precisely what his supporters want. He, or any President, is not above the law and Smith is determined that he is held accountable. Jack Smith and his team have been smart enough to remove any evidence that might have run afoul of the courts ruling and have just resubmitted the same four felony charges with a more robust filing. After a ruling by Judge Chutkan, this will no doubt end up back at the SCOTUS who should then find it extremely difficult to protect Trump again, in light of the new submittals. Well played Jack. Judge Cannon ... you're next, especially with help from Judge Scarsi's recent comments

Have you only written 8 pages, usually you prattle on for much longer ?

The days of Trump having a big rally are long gone. He is lucky to average 5k to 5.5k for at least 28 of the 37 rallies he has had this year. Video footage shows half full stadiums as well as many leaving during his blethering. Very little incentive to go as it is always the same schtick, (me, me, me). Guess its always a good opportunity to pick up either a diaper t-shirt, or a sanitary product ear warmer, as a souvenir.

Show me where in that article it demonstrates that Harris wants to drop out of the Sept 10 debate.

Pure speculation. Nothing in that linked article suggests Harris wants to pull out.

The topic is : Trump Just Pulled Out Of The Debate.

The topic is : Trump Just Pulled Out Of The Debate. One rule change which Trump would love. The original agreement was not with Faux or NBC. That is Trump trying to muddy the waters. Hope he has stocked up on Depends.