The South Bangkok Criminal Court on 11 June 2026, sentenced two defendants to death in connection with the 2015 Erawan Shrine bombing at the Ratchaprasong intersection in central Bangkok, which killed 20 people and injured 160 others. The court found Adem Karadag and Mai Ralieu Yusufu guilty of jointly committing premeditated murder, ruling that no mitigating circumstances were present to reduce their sentences.
Get today's headlines by email 
The judgment was delivered at around 12:50 after the court concluded its review of evidence presented by the prosecution and defence. Prosecutors had charged the two men with offences linked to terrorism and their alleged involvement in planning and carrying out the explosion at the Thao Maha Phrom (Erawan) Shrine, a major religious site and tourist landmark in Bangkok.
The 2015 blast at the Ratchaprasong commercial district remains one of the deadliest attacks in Thailand in recent history. The explosion caused widespread casualties and significant disruption in a densely populated area known for shopping centres, hotels and heavy pedestrian traffic. The case has remained a high-profile prosecution due to its scale and impact on both Thai citizens and foreign visitors.
During proceedings following the verdict, Mai Ralieu Yusufu openly rejected the court’s decision, shouting inside the courtroom that he disagreed with the ruling and insisting that he was not responsible for the offence. He also called for what he described as a lack of justice in the outcome. Court officials maintained order as the judgment was announced. There were no additional reported outbursts from Adem Karadag in the courtroom description provided.
ThaiPBS reported that following the ruling, the case now moves into the post-judgment phase of the Thai criminal justice process. Under Thai law, the defendants retain the right to appeal the decision to higher courts, where both legal interpretation and evidentiary findings may be reviewed. If appeals are filed, the case could proceed through multiple judicial levels, potentially extending the timeline for a final, enforceable verdict. Until all appeal options are exhausted, the legal status of the sentences remains subject to review within the appellate system.
Join the discussion? 
Already a member? 
Adapted by ASEAN Now Thaipbs 11 June 2026