Jump to content

A husband never forgot his unfaithful wife - axes her to death as she swings in a hammock


webfact

Recommended Posts

Just now, GBW said:

Yes.  post 18 noted. this guy is clearly a fkn nuttbag.  but his state of mind is not my question. My question to you is , was his crime a crime of revenge?

It doesnt lessen the crime if it was

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

It only took two or three blows to the neck and head and his revenge was complete.

Saved him having to hack away for hours I guess! :shock1:

Strange reporting! - How many blows is usual?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gandalf12 said:

It doesnt lessen the crime if it was

Who said it lessens the crime? axe murderer, NO THANK YOU! no get of  jail card here mister!  Im just asking, about the word    'revenge''   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GBW said:

Who said it lessens the crime? axe murderer, NO THANK YOU! no get of  jail card here mister!  Im just asking, about the word    'revenge''   

If you think about it, it must have been as he waited a long time so it wasnt something in the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, gandalf12 said:

If you think about it, it must have been as he waited a long time so it wasnt something in the moment

Agreed, so it was 'revenge'  ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GBW said:

Yes.  post 18 noted. this guy is clearly a fkn nuttbag.  but his state of mind is not my question. My question to you is , was his crime a crime of revenge?

And I said “no”

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

And I said “no”

well maybe when you say the word revenge''  is not applicable in you post, you should think prior. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

The accused and the OP pointed out very clearly that it was revenge.  If you want to interpret it differently without knowing the man at all that would be your privilege but you'd be wrong.

Not revenge as far as I’m concerned. Just another narcissist unable to handle a woman making choices. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GBW said:

well maybe when you say the word revenge''  is not applicable in you post, you should think prior. ?

I did think.  

 

I thought what this gutless cowardly manboy did, does not deserve the description of revenge. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Not revenge as far as I’m concerned. Just another narcissist unable to handle a woman making choices. 

give it up! IT WAS REVENGE!  who ever it was

 

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

I did think.  

 

I thought what this gutless cowardly manboy did, does not deserve the description of revenge. 

what do you call it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GBW said:

give it up! IT WAS REVENGE!  who ever it was

 

what do you call it?

Nothing to give up. 

 

As to what I call it...

 

Revenge implies he was wronged. 

 

He wasn't.

 

A woman made the choice to leave this coward. 

 

He couldn’t handle that. 

 

His ego was too weak to accept rejection, so he murdered her. 

 

Gutless, cowardly narcissism. 

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

The word revenge is not applicable in this story. 

 

His wife left him, tough.

 

Move on and get on with your life. 

 

What this story is about, is a gutless coward who attacked a woman when she was unable to defend herself. 

 

It is about yet another man’s pathetic inability to deal with rejection. 

 

 

imo much more than a coward, serious mental issues or perhaps baseline mentation in society? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I’ll think as I want.

 

You dont decide for me.

 

As to what I call it...

 

See Post 18. ,

You are missing the point. You dismissed the word REVENGE from the topic. clearly this case is revenge.

Furthermore I certainty DO NOT decide, nor presume any input from posters.

Just admit it , REVENGE,  was the topic and sub sequential loss of this womans life .   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GBW said:

You are missing the point. You dismissed the word REVENGE from the topic. clearly this case is revenge.

Furthermore I certainty DO NOT decide, nor presume any input from posters.

Just admit it , REVENGE,  was the topic and sub sequential loss of this womans life .   

I said the word revenge is not applicable and have explained to you why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, GBW said:

well maybe when you say the word revenge''  is not applicable in you post, you should think prior. ?

Probably Bluespunk would just use plain and simple "murder".

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, GBW said:

give it up! IT WAS REVENGE!  who ever it was

 

what do you call it?

the issue with calling it vengeance is that implies

she had wronged him,

but she hadnt, she had walked away from that relation as per her right.

 

in his mind, she had wronged him and he repaid the wrongdoing,

but for that to be,

he must think he had some sort of right to her body and possibly mind.

some sort of ownership that she trespassed as far as he could see it,

so hope someone can extract perhaps a diagnosis what to call it.

 

thinking further, i start to suspect he had spent money on her that he couldnt bear to lose,

perhaps sin sod yet again is behind this murder too,

he figured he had paid for a lifetime in advance,

while she viewed the sin sod more like a barfine + whole night kinda contract

Edited by poanoi
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Nothing to give up. 

 

As to what I call it...

 

Revenge implies he was wronged. 

 

He wasn't.

 

A woman made the choice to leave this coward. 

 

He couldn’t handle that. 

 

His ego was too weak to accept rejection, so he murdered her. 

 

Gutless, cowardly narcissism. 

So his  act,  was revenge?   in his mind,     I dont care how cowardly this narcissist is, his crime was REVENGE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GBW said:

So his  act,  was revenge?   in his mind,     I dont care how cowardly this narcissist is, his crime was REVENGE

No, it was the act of a narcissistic coward. 

 

It was murder. 

 

He wasnt wronged, just rejected. 

 

Therefore, the word “revenge” is not applicable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Nothing to give up. 

 

As to what I call it...

 

Revenge implies he was wronged. 

 

He wasn't.

 

A woman made the choice to leave this coward. 

 

He couldn’t handle that. 

 

His ego was too weak to accept rejection, so he murdered her. 

 

Gutless, cowardly narcissism. 

In this case "revenge" simply implies the he THINKS he was wronged. Which he does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SiamRose said:

In this case "revenge" simply implies the he THINKS he was wronged. Which he does.  

Nonetheless, I don’t think it applies and doesn’t accurately reflect what happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when he gave her sin sod/money/others, he thought he was buying time,

but the problem was he never had her sign the dotted line how long he

expected her to stay in service for the money, he was paying in advance

and that is never a good thing for mental health or economy.

 

for her, she would have done well to simply ask him when he paid

sin sod/money/others how long he expected her to stay in service for those money.

 

i know of two cases where its concluded the murder was due to alleged breach of contract,

and there are in all likelihood beyond doubt many cases

where it boils down to sin sod and alleged breach of contract, so i think any sin sod from now by law should

have in print how much time and what service is expected for the payment

Edited by poanoi
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bkkthebest said:

It clearly shows that women marry for resources and security and not for love. 

Yes, own experience?

Marrying out of love, of course, is mighty stupid.

It is just a business agreement, eventually enriched with feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...